Cover not available
Part of
Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction: Multimodal and cross-linguistic perspectives
Edited by Manuela Romano and Maria Dolores Porto
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 262] 2016
► pp. 1–17

Discourse, cognition and society

| University Autónoma de Madrid
| University of Alcalá
Published online: 31 March 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.262.01rom
References
Barlow, Michael
2000 “Usage, Blends, and Grammar.” In Usage-Based Models of Language, ed by Michael Barlow and Suzanne Kemmer, 315–345. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Barlow, Michael and Suzanne Kemmer
(eds) 2000 Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika and James R. Martin
(eds) 2010 New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bedny, George, Karwowski Waldemar, and Marina Bedny
2001 “The Principle of Unity of Cognition and Behavior: Implications of Activity Theory for the Study of Human Work.” International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 5 (4): 401–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernárdez, Enrique
1995 Teoría y Eepistemología del Texto. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
2008a El Lenguaje como Cultura: Una Crítica del Discurso sobre el Lenguaje [Language as Culture: A Critical Approach to the Discourse of Language]. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
2008b “Collective Cognition and Individual Activity: Variation, Language and Culture.” In Body, Language and Mind. Vol. 2: Sociocultural Situatedness, ed. by Roslyn M. Frank, René Dirven, Tom Ziemke and Enrique Bernárdez, 137–166. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2009 “Algunas consideraciones contra el individualismo esencialista en las lingüísticas cognitivas [Some considerations against essentialist individualism in cognitive linguistics].” In La Lingüística como reto Epistemológico y como Acción Social [Language as an Epistemological Challenge and as Social Action], ed. by Montserrat Veyrat, and Enrique Serra, 1–10. Madrid: Arco.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
1994 Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l’action [Practical reason. On the Theory of Action]. Paris. Éditions de Seuil.Google Scholar
Brandt, Line and Per A. Brandt
2005 “Making Sense of a Blend. A Cognitive-Semiotic Approach to Metaphor.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3: 216–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ronald
2004 Language and Creativity. The Art of Common Talk. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald A. and Michael J. McCarthy
2004 “Talking Creating: Interactional language, Creativity and Context.” Applied Linguistics 25 (1): 62–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Beaugrande, Robert. A. and Wolfgang U. Dressler
1981 Introduction to Text Linguisitics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, Robert
1996 “The Story of Discourse Analysis”. In Introduction to Discourse Analysis, ed. by Teun A. Van Dijk, 35–62. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick. J.
2009 “Relationship of Thinking and Human Pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 60–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1992 Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph
1990 The Sociolinguistics of Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1994/1985 Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles and Mark Turner
2002 The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles and Eduardo Urios-Aparisi
(eds) 2009 Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, Charles
2010 “Why and How Study Metaphor, Metonymy, and other Tropes in Multimodal Discourse?” In Comunicação, Cognição e Media Vol. I, ed. by Augusto Soares da Silva, José C. Martins, Luísa Magalhães, and Miguel Gonçalves, 41–60. Braga: Aletheia/Associação Científica e Cultural, Faculdade de Filosofia, Universade Católica Portuguesa.Google Scholar
Frank, Roslyn M., René Dirven, Ton Ziemke and Enrique Bernárdez
(eds.) 2008 Body, Language and Mind. Vol. 2: Sociocultural Situatedness. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Garrod, Simon and Martin J. Pickering
2004 “Why is Conversation so Easy?” TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 8 (1): 8–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk and Stefan Grondelaers
1995 “Looking back at Anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns.” In Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, ed. by John R. Taylor and Robert E. MacLaury, 153‐179. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, Gitte Kristiansen and Yves Peirsman
(eds) 2010 Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghassemzadeh, Habibollah
2005 “Vygotsky’s Mediational Psychology: A New Conceptualization of Culture, Signification and Metaphor.” Language Sciences 27 (3): 281–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond
1994 The Poetics of the Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glynn, Dylan and Kerstin Fischer
(eds) 2010. Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-driven approaches. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gontier, Nathalie
2009 “The Origin of the Social Approach in Language and Cognitive Research Exemplified by Studies in the Origin of Language.” In Language and Social Cognition. Expression of the Social Mind, ed by Hanna Pishwa, 25–46. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Grady, Joseph E., Todd Oakley and Seana Coulson
1999 “Blending and Metaphor.” In Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Gerard Steen and Raymond Gibbs, 101–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1982 Discourse Strategies. Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark
1987 The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltan
2002 Metaphor: A practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther
2010 Multimodality. A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Gitte, Dirven, René and Francisco Ruiz de Mendoza
(eds) 2006. Applications of Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations and Fields of Application. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Gitte and René Dirven
(eds) 2008 Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Language Variation, Cultural Models, Social Systems. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987 Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 Moral Politics. How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson
1980 Metaphors we Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol.1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1994 “Culture, Cognition, and Grammar.” In Language Contact and Language Conflict, ed. by Martin Pütz, 25–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 “Discourse in Cognitive Grammar.” Cognitive Linguisitics 12 (2): 143–188.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Jessica and Tom Ziemke
2002 “Social Situatedness of Natural and Artificial Intelligence: Vigotsky and Beyond.” Adaptive Behaviour 11 (2): 79–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maybin, Janet and Joan Swann
(eds) 2006 The Art of English. Everyday Creativity. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Menéndez, Salvio M.
2005 “¿Qué es una estrategia discursiva? [What is a discourse strategy?].” In Teorías Críticas de la Literatura y la Lingüística. Debates Actuales [Critical Theories of Literature and Linguistics. Current Debates], ed. by Susana Santos and Jorge Panesi. Buenos Aires: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras [CD-ROM].Google Scholar
Morales-López, Esperanza
2011 “Hacia dónde va el análisis del discurso [Where is discourse analysis heading to?].” Revista Elctrónica de Estudios Filológicos 21. [URL] (April 22, 2015).Google Scholar
Müller, Ulrich and Jeremy I.M. Carpendale
2001 “The Role of Social Interaction in Piaget’s Theory: Language for Social Cooperation and Social Cooperation for Language.” New Ideas in Psychology 18 (2–3): 139–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas and Joerg Zinken
(eds) 2009 Metaphor and Discourse. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norris, Sigrid
2004 Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay L.
2004 Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives. 
London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Palmer, Gary B.
1996 Towards a Theory of Cultural Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Page, Ruth
(ed) 2009 New Perspectives on Narrative and Multimodality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair
2007 “The Rotation gets Thick. The Constraints get Thin’: Creativity, Recontextualization, and Difference.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 28 (4): 579–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pishwa, Hanna
2009 Language and Social Cognition. Expression of the Social Mind. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Porto, M. Dolores and Manuela Romano
2013 “Newspaper Metaphors: Re-using Metaphors for New Purposes.” Metaphor & Symbol 28 (1): 60–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pütz, Martin, Robinson, Justyna A. and Monika Reif
(eds) 2014 Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Social and Cultural Variation in Cognition and Language Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohrer, Tim
2006 “Three Dogmas of Embodiment: Cognitive Linguistics as a Cognitive Science.” In Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perpectives, ed. by Gitte Kristiansen, Michel Achard, René Dirven and Francisco Ruiz de Mendoza, 119–146. 
Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2007 “The Body in Space: Dimensions of Embodiment.” In Body, Language and Mind, Vol 1: Embodiment, ed. by Tom Ziemke, Jordan Zlatev, and Roslyn M. Frank, 339–377. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Romano, Manuela
2013 “Situated-Instant Metaphors: Creativity in 15M Slogans.” Metaphor and the Social World (Special Issue: Metaphorical Creativity across Modes) 3 (2): 241–260.Google Scholar
2015 “La protesta social como ‘laboratorio’ de creatividad metafórica [Social protest as a ‘laboratory’ of metaphorical creativity].” Discourso y Sociedad 9 (1–2): 41–65.Google Scholar
Sal-Paz, Julio C. and Silvia D. Maldonado
2009 “Estrategias discursivas: un abordaje terminológico [Discourse strategies: A terminological approach].” Espéculo: Revista de Estudios Literarios 43: 1–16.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1994 Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Semino, Elena
2008 Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharifian, Farzad
2008 “Distributed, Emergent Cultural Cognition, Conceptualization and Language.” In Body, Language and Mind. Vol. 2: Sociocultural Situatedness. ed. by Roslyn M. Frank, René Dirven, Tom Ziemke, and Enrique Bernárdez, 109–136. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011 Cultural Conceptualizations and Language: Theoretical Framework and Applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Cultural Linguistcs.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture, ed. by Farzad Sharifian, 473–492. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sharifian, Farzad and Maryam Jamarani
2013 Language and Intercultural Communication in the New Era. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Eliot R. and Gün R. Semin
2004 “Socially Situated Cognition: Cognition in its Social Context.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 36: 53–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speelman, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers and Dirk Geeraerts
2013 “Profile-Based Linguistic Uniformity as a Generic Method for Comparing Language Varieties.” Computers and the Humanities 37: 317–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol and Stefan Th. Gries
(eds) 2007 Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sternberg, Robert J.
1999 Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1988 “The Relation of Grammar to Cognition.” In Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, 165–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
(ed) 1985 Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Vol. I: Disciplines of Discourse. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1993 Elite Discourse and Racism. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed) 1997 Discourse Studies. A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2014 “Cincuenta años de estudios del discurso [Fifty years of Discourse studies].” Discurso & Sociedad 9 (1–2): 15–32.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Michael Meyer
(eds) 2001 Methods of Critical Analysis. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziemke, Tom, Jordan Zlatev and Roslyn M. Frank
(eds) 2007 Body, Language and Mind, Vol. 1: Embodiment. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan
1997 Situated Embodiment: Studies in the Emergence of Spatial Meaning. Stockholm: Gotab.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Serrano, María José
2018. The Construction of Advertising Discourse by the Use of the Second-Person Object Te and the Clitic Se . Pragmática Sociocultural / Sociocultural Pragmatics 6:2 ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.