Cover not available
Part of
Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction: Multimodal and cross-linguistic perspectives
Edited by Manuela Romano and M. Dolores Porto
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 262] 2016
► pp. 79–108

The persuasive (and manipulative) power of metaphor in ‘austerity’ discourse

A corpus-based analysis of embodied and moral metaphors of austerity in the Portuguese press

| Catholic University of Portugal
This chapter analyses the persuasive power of metaphors used in the Portuguese press to justify the implementation of harsh austerity policies. The analysis relies on a corpus of news and opinion articles published in June-July 2011, after the entry of the Troika, and May 2013, when protests against the austerity policies intensified. The study adopts a socio-cognitive view of language following the promising convergence between Cognitive Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis, and the corpus-based and critical discourse-based approach to conceptual metaphor. Using the target-domain method for corpus-based metaphor identification, 1,151 austerity-related metaphorical expressions associated with eight target lexemes were gathered, which include great chain of being, image schemas, and event/action metaphors. The analysis reveals the persuasive and manipulative force of certain specific metaphors, such as obesity/diet, indebted family, good student, and sacrifice. These socially-embodied metaphors are grounding in moral cultural models and serve ideological, emotional and moral purposes.
Keywords: Cognitive Linguistics, conceptual metaphor, corpus-based analysis, Critical Discourse Analysis, embodiment, ideology, morality, persuasion, political and economic discourse, situatedness
Published online: 31 March 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.262.04soa
References (54)
References
Bauman, Zygmunt. 2006. Liquid Fear. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bernárdez, Enrique. 2008. “Collective Cognition and Individual Activity: Variation, Language and Culture.” In Body, Language, and Mind. Volume 2. Sociocultural Situatedness, ed. by Roslyn M. Frank, René Dirven, Tom Ziemke and Enrique Bernárdez, 137–166. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2013. Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. 2nd edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “What is the Purpose of Metaphor in Political Discourse? An Answer from Critical Metaphor Analysis.” In Comunicação Política e Económica. Dimensões Cognitivas e Discursivas, ed. by Augusto Soares da Silva, Cândido Martins, Luísa Magalhães, and Miguel Gonçalves, 69–87. Braga: Aletheia, Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 1996. Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. Frankfurt/New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dirven, René, Frank Polzenhagen and Hans-Georg Wolf. 2007. “Cognitive Linguistics, Ideology, and Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens, 1222–1240. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frank, Roslyn M., René Dirven, Tom Ziemke and Enrique Bernárdez (eds). 2008. Body, Language, and Mind. Volume 2. Sociocultural Situatedness. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2010. Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk and Hubert Cuyckens (eds). 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hampe, Beate (ed). 2005. From Perception to Meaning. Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Discourse.” In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Ewa 
Dabrowska and Dagmar Divjak, 322–346. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herrera-Soler, Honesto and Michael White (eds). 2012. Metaphor and Mills. Figurative Language in Business and Economics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Koller, Veronika. 2004. Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A Critical Cognitive Study. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Socio-cognitive Approaches to Corporate Discourse.” In Comunicação Política e Económica. Dimensões Cognitivas e Discursivas, ed. by Augusto Soares da Silva, Cândido Martins, Luísa Magalhães and Miguel Gonçalves, 89–103. Braga: Aletheia, Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Cognitive Linguistics and Ideology.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Jeanette Littlemore and John R. Taylor, 234–252. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2002. Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 2010. “Myths of Austerity.” The New York Times, July 1. [URL]Google Scholar
. 2011. “When Austerity Fails.” The New York Times, May 22. [URL]Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1993. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Moral Politics. How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Don’t Think of Elephant! Know your Values and Frame the Debate: The Essential Guide for Progressives. New York: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O. 1936. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moreno Lara, María Angeles. 2008. La metáfora en el lenguaje político de la prensa americana. Modelos cognitivos y formación de significado. Granada: Comares.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas and Jorg Zinken (eds). 2009. Metaphor and Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakley, Todd. 2007. “Image Schemas.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens, 214–235. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peña Cervel, Sandra. 2003. Topology and Cognition: What Image Schemas Reveal about the Metaphorical Language of Emotions. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Pishwa, Hanna (ed). 2009. Language and Social Cognition. Expression of the Social Mind. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rojo López, Ana María and María Ángeles Orts Llopis. 2010. “Metaphorical Pattern Analysis in Financial Texts: Framing the Crisis in Positive or Negative Metaphorical Terms.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3300–3313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sardinha, Tony Berber. 2011. “Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics.” Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 11 (2): 329–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Soares da Silva, Augusto. 2003. “Image Schemas and Category Coherence: The Case of the Portuguese Verb Deixar.” In Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics, ed. by Hubert 
Cuyckens, René Dirven and John R. Taylor, 281–322. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. O Mundo dos Sentidos em Português: Polissemia, Semântica e Cognição [The World of Senses in Portuguese: Semantic Polysemy and Cognition]. Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
. 2013a. “O que sabemos sobre a crise económica, pela metáfora. Conceptualizações metafóricas da crise na imprensa portuguesa [What we know about the economic crisis through metaphor. Metaphorical conceptualizations of the crisis in the Portuguese press].” Revista Media & Jornalismo 23 (1): 11–34.Google Scholar
. 2013b. “Introdução. Comunicação política e económica: cognição e discurso [Introduction. Political and economic communication: cognition and discourse].” In Comunicação Política e Económica. Dimensões cognitivas e discursivas [Political and Economic Communication. Cognitive and Discursive Dimensions], ed. by Augusto Soares da Silva, Cândido Martins, Luísa Magalhães, and Miguel Gonçalves, 1–19. Braga: Aletheia, Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard J. 2011. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor – Now New and Improved!” Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9 (1): 26–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “The Cognitive-Linguistic Revolution in Metaphor Studies.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Jeanette Littlemore, and John R. Taylor, 117–142. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2006. “Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy.” In Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. by Anatol Stefanowitsch, and Stephan Th. Gries, 1–16. Berlin/NewYork: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol and Stefan Th. Gries. 2006. Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun. 2006. “Discourse and Manipulation.” Discourse and Society 17 (3): 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vereza, Solange Coelho. 2007. “Metáfora e argumentação: Uma abordagem cognitivo-discursiva [Metaphor and argumentation: A cognitive-discursive approach].” Linguagem em (Dis)curso 7 (3): 487–506.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Discourse, Cognition and Figurative Language: Exploring Metaphors in Political Editorials.” In Comunicação Política e Económica. Dimensões Cognitivas e Discursivas, ed. by Augusto Soares da Silva, Cândido Martins, Luísa Magalhães, and Miguel Gonçalves, 395–406. Braga: Aletheia, Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.Google Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha and Esa Itkonen (eds). 2008. The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

El Shazly, Reham & May Samir El Falaky
2024. Hydro-political power of the Nile. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Peterssen, Silvia & Augusto Soares da Silva
2024. Polarising metaphors in the Venezuelan Presidential Crisis. Journal of Language and Politics 23:4 ► pp. 588 ff. DOI logo
Ventura Olivet, Yoselis & Paola Alarcón Hernández
2022. La representación del trastorno del espectro autista: una mirada desde la teoría de la metáfora conceptual. Lengua y Sociedad 21:2 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Alarcón Hernández, Paola, Díaz Larenas, Claudio & Vásquez Bustos, Víctor
2019. Un análisis de columnas de opinión desde la metáfora conceptual. Signo y Pensamiento 37:73 DOI logo
Muelas Gil, María
2019. Ideology, metaphor and persuasion in times of elections: a corpus-based study of British and Spanish economic reports. Complutense Journal of English Studies 27 ► pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Romano, Manuela
2019. ‘Refugees are streaming into Europe’: An image-schema analysis of the Syrian Refugee crisis in the Spanish and British press. Complutense Journal of English Studies 27 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Romano, Manuela & M Dolores Porto
2018. ‘The tide, change, nobody can stop it’: Metaphor for social action. Discourse & Society 29:6 ► pp. 655 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Modeling Irony [Figurative Thought and Language, 12], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.