Cover not available
Part of
Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction: Multimodal and cross-linguistic perspectives
Edited by Manuela Romano and Maria Dolores Porto
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 262] 2016
► pp. 245–272

A text-world account of temporal world-building strategies in Spanish and English

| University of Huddersfield

Text World Theory (Werth 1999; Gavins 2007) is a cognitive stylistic model that aims to describe how discourse participants create a mental representation of language in use. First designed for the analysis of individual texts, this chapter demonstrates how it can also be used in the cross-linguistic analysis of narrative strategies. This chapter is based on a wider research project which applied Text World Theory to a comparable corpus of ‘frog story’ narratives revealing differences between the ways in which Spanish and English speakers construct the ‘same’ narrative text-world. The focus here is on the narrators’ temporal world-­building strategies only, as choices in tense were fundamental in laying the foundations for other world-building strategies. The results reveal interesting cross-­linguistic and dialectal differences in temporal world-building strategies and point to uses of tenses for non-temporal means.

Keywords: corpus, dialect, English, frog stories, Spanish, spoken narrative, temporality, tense, Text World Theory
Published online: 31 March 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.262.10lug
References
Anthony, Laurence
2004 “AntConc: A Learner and Classroom Friendly, Multi-Platform Corpus Analysis Toolkit.” Paper presented at IWLeL: An Interactive Workshop on Language e-Learning.
Aske, Jon
1989 “Path Predicates in English and Spanish: A Closer Look.” Paper presented at Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Bamberg, Michael
1985 Form and Function in the Construction of Narratives: Developmental Perspectives. Berkeley, CA.: University of California. Unpublished PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Bennett-Kastor, Tina
2002 “The ‘Frog-Story’ Narratives of Irish-English Bilinguals.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 5: 131–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. and Dan I. Slobin
1994 Relating Events in Narrative: A Cross-Linguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bernárdez, Enrique
2005 “Social Cognition: Variation, Language, and Culture in a Cognitive Linguistic Typology.” In Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction, ed. by M.S. Peña Cervel and F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, 191–224. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1993 “Representativeness in Corpus Design.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 8: 243–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
CHILDES
2015 Child Language Data Exchange System. [URL]. Last accessed 23/09/2015.Google Scholar
Cook, Guy
1994 Discourse and Literature: The Interplay of Form and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cruickshank, Tracy and Ernestine Lahey
2010 “Building the Stages of Drama: Towards a Text World Theory Account of Dramatic Play-Texts.” Journal of Literary Semantics 39: 67–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara
2008 “The Text and the Story.” In Mental Spaces in Discourse and Interaction, ed. by T. Oakley and A. Hougaard, 51–78. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Beaugrande, Robert-Alain
1980 Text, Discourse, and Process. Advances in Discourse Processes. Vol. IV. ed. by R.O. Freedle. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, Robert-Alain and Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler
1981 Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Emmott, Catherine
1997 Narrative Comprehension: A Discourse Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1994 “Frames of Reference: Contextual Monitoring and Narrative Discourse.” In Advances in Written Text Analysis, ed. by M. Coulthard, 157–166. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1992 “Splitting the Referent: An Introduction to Narrative Enactors.” In Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice, ed. by M. Davies, M. Coulthard and L. Ravelli, 221–228. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Giles
1994 Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1985 “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding.” Quaderni de Semantica 6: 222–254.Google Scholar
1982 “Frame Semantics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm. ed. by The Linguistic Society of America, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
1977 “Scenes-and-Frames Semantics.” In Linguistic Structures Processing, ed. by A. Zampolli, 55–82. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika
1996 Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavins, Joanna
2013 Reading the Absurd. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
2007 Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “(Re)Thinking Modality: A Text-World Perspective.” Journal of Literary Semantics 34: 79–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 “ ‘Too Much Blague?’: An Exploration of the Text-Worlds of Donald Barthelme’s Snow White.” In Cognitive Poetics in Practice. ed. by J. Gavins and G. Steen, 129–143. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Text World Theory: A Critical Exposition and Development in Relation to Absurd Prose Fiction. Sheffield Hallam University. Unpublished PhD thesis.Google Scholar
2000 “Absurd Tricks with Bicycles Frames in the Text World of ‘the Third Policeman’.” Nottingham Linguistic Circular 15: 17–33.Google Scholar
Giovanelli, Marcello
2013 Text World Theory and Keats’ Poetry: The Cognitive Poetics of Desire, Dreams and Nightmares. Advances in Stylistics. London & New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Araus, María Luz
1995 Formas temporales del pasado en indicativo. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Harris, Martin
1982 “The ‘Past Simple’ and the ‘Present Perfect’ in Romance.” In Studies in the Romance Verb, ed. by Nigel Vincent and Martin Harris, 42–70. London & Canberra: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Hidalgo Downing, Laura
2003 “Text World Creation in Advertising Discourse.” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 13: 67–88.Google Scholar
2002 “Alice in Pragmaticland: Reference, Deixis, and the Delimitation of Text Worlds in Lewis Carol’s Alice Books.” Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada en Comunicación 2.Google Scholar
2000 Negation, Text Worlds and Discourse: The Pragmatics of Fiction. Connecticut: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne and Nicholas Smith
2009 “The Present Perfect in British and American English: HasThere Been Any Change, Recently?” International Computer Archive of Modern and Medieval English 33.Google Scholar
Institute of Language and Communication (ISK)
Visual Interactive Syntax Learning (VISL). [URL]. University of Southern Denmark.
Jakobson, Roman
2000 On Linguistic Aspects of Translation. In The Translation Studies Reader, ed. by L. Venuti, 113–118. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kahle, David J., Anoop Kumar, and Ranjani Saigal
2003 “Visual Understanding Environment.” Paper presented at Syllabus Conference. Cambridge, MA. 8th–10th December.
Kany, Charles E
1969 Sintaxis hispanoamericana. Madrid: Grecos.Google Scholar
King, Larry D
1992 The Semantic Structure of Spanish: Meaning and Grammatical Form. 
Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kumar, Anoop and N. Schwertner
2008 “Visual Understanding Environment.” Paper presented at Third International Conference on Open Repositories 2008. Southampton, UK. 1st–4th April 2008.
Kumar, Anoop and Ranjani Saigal
2005 “Visual Understanding Environment.” Paper presented at Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. Denver, Colorado. DOI logo
Kumar, Anoop and David Kahle
2006 “VUE: A Concept Mapping Tool for Digital Content.” Paper presented at Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping. San José, Costa Rica. 2006.
Labov, William
1972 “The Transformation of Experience in Narrative Syntax.” In Language in the Inner City, ed. by W. Labov, 354–396. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lahey, Ernestine
2006 “(Re)Thinking World-Building: Locating the Text-Worlds of Canadian Lyric Poetry.” Journal of Literary Semantics 35: 145–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1968 Counterparts, or the Problems of Reference in Transformational Grammar. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Lewis, David
1973 “Possible Worlds”. In Counterfactuals, 84–91. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1968 “Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic.” Journal of Philosophy 65: 113–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lugea, Jane
forthcoming. World-building in Spanish and English Spoken Narratives. London: Bloomsbury.
2013 “Embedded Dialogue and Dreams: The Worlds and Accessibility Relations of Inception.” Language and Literature 22: 133–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian
2000 The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. 3rd Edition. Vol. 2: The Database. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian and Geoffrey Leech
2006 “Current Changes in English Syntax.” In The Handbook of English Linguistics, ed by Bas Aarts and April McMahon, 318–342. Oxford: 
Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Mercer
2003 Frog, Where are You? New York: Dial Books.Google Scholar
Meyer, Charles F
2002 English Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakley, Todd and Anders Hougaard
2008 Mental Spaces in Discourse and Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Otaola Olano, Concepción
2006 Análisis lingüístico del discurso: la lingüística enunciativa. 
Madrid: Ediciones Académicas.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas
1979 “The Ontology of the Possible.” In The Possible and the Actual, ed. by Michael J. Loux, 166–181. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Reyes, Graciela
1990 “Valores estilísticos del imperfecto.” Revista de Filología Española 70: 45–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rojo, Guillermo and Alexandre Veiga
1999 “El tiempo verbal: los tiempos simples.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Romano, Manuela
2014 “Evaluation in Emotion Discourse.” In Evaluation in Context, ed. by Geoff Thompson and Laura Alba, 367–386. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (Pragmatics & Beyond Series). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure
1991a “Possible Worlds and Accessibility Relations: A Semantic Typology of Fiction.” Poetics Today 12: 553–576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991b Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence and Narrative Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Schank, Roger C. and Robert P. Abelson
1977 Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1981 “Tense Variation in Narrative.” Language 57: 45–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segal, Erwin
1995 “Narrative Comprehension and the Role of Deictic Shift Theory.” In Deixis in Narrative, ed. by Judith Duchan, Gail Bruder and Lynne Hewitt, 3–17. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Semino, Elena
2010 “Text Worlds in Poetry.” In Contemporary Stylistics, ed. by Marina 
Lambrou and Peter Stockwell, 116–132. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
1997 Language and World Creation in Poems and Other Texts. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen
1983 “Tense and Aspect in Oral Spanish Narrative: Context and Meaning.” Language 59: 760–780. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I
2004 “The Many Ways to Search for a Frog: Linguistic Typology and the Expression of Motion Events.” In Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives. Vol. 2, ed. by Sven Strömqvist and Ludo Verhoeven, 219–257. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
1996 “Two Ways to Travel: Verbs of Motion in English and Spanish.” In Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning, ed. by Masayoshi Shibatani and Sandra A. Thompson, 195–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter
2002 Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strevens, Peter
1972 British and American English. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Strömqvist, Sven and Ludo Verhoeven
(eds.). 2004 Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives. Vol. 2. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1979 “What is in a Frame? Surface Evidence for Underlying Expectations.” In New Directions in Discourse Processing, ed. by Roy O. Feedle, 137–181. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. and Walter Kintsch
1983 Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York & London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Werth, Paul
1999 Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1995a “How to Build a World (in a Lot Less that Six Days, and using Only what’s in Your Head).” In New Essays on Deixis: Discourse, Narrative, Literature, ed. by Keith Green, 49–80. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1995b “ ‘World enough, and Time’: Deictic Space and the Interpretation of Prose.” In Twentieth Century Fiction: From Text to Context, ed. by Peter Verdonk and Jean Jacques Weber, 181–205. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1994 “Extended Metaphor: A Text-World Account.” Language and Literature 3: 79–103.Google Scholar
1992 “Support Your Localist Sheriff: Localist Grammar and Deictic Space.” Linguistica Antverpiensia XXVI: 237–269.Google Scholar
1990 “Towards a More Human Linguistics.” Unpublished inaugural lecture given at University of Amsterdam. Held in the Text World Theory special collection. University of Sheffield.
1981 “Tense, Modality and Possible Worlds.” Rapport des Activités de l’Institut de Phonetique 16: 17–30.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Lugea, Jane
2017. The year’s work in stylistics 2016. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:4 ► pp. 340 ff. DOI logo
Lugea, Jane & Brian Walker
2023. Point of View. In Stylistics, ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Lugea, Jane & Brian Walker
2023. Worlds. In Stylistics, ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.