References
Attaviriyanupap, Korakoch
2015 “The linguistic representation of gender in Thai.” In Gender Across Languages. The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Vol. 4, ed. by Marlis Hellinger, and Heiko Motschenbacher, 369–399. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul
2002Fantabulosa. A Dictionary of Polari and Gay Slang. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Baron, Dennis
1986Grammar and Gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
2014Facebook multiplies genders but offers users the same three tired pronouns. [URL] (accessed: 12 March, 2014).Google Scholar
Bodine, Ann
1975 “Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: Singular ‘they’, sex-indefinite ‘he’, and ‘he or she’.” Language in Society 4(2): 129–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braun, Friederike, and Geoffrey Haig
2010 “When are German ‘girls’ feminine? How the semantics of age influences the grammar of gender agreement.” In Language in its Socio-Cultural Context: New Explorations in Global, Media and Gendered Uses, ed. by Markus Bieswanger, Heiko Motschenbacher, and Susanne Mühleisen, 69–84. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith
1990Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
1993Bodies that Matter. On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, and Paul Hopper
2001 “Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure.” In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, ed. by Joan Bybee, and Paul Hopper, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clancy, Steven J
1999 “The ascent of guy.” American Speech 74(3): 282–297.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G
1991Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques
1988Limited Inc. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Duke, Janet
2008The Development of Gender as a Grammatical Category: Five Case Studies from the Germanic Languages. Heidelberg: WinterGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Keith
2002 “Camp talk and citationality: A queer take on ‘authentic’ and ‘represented’ utterance.” Journal of Pragmatics 34(9): 1145–1165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellinger, Marlis, and Hadumod Bußmann
2001 “Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men.” In Gender Across Languages. The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Vol. 1, ed. by Marlis Hellinger, and Hadumod Bußmann, 1–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds) 2001–2003Gender Across Languages. The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Vol. 1–3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellinger, Marlis, and Heiko Motschenbacher
(eds) 2015Gender Across Languages. The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Vol. 4. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hollmann, Willem B
2009a “Semantic change.” In English Language. Description, Variation and Context, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Francis Katamba, Paul Kerswill, Ruth Wodak, and Tony McEnery, 301–313. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2009b “Grammatical change.” In English Language. Description, Variation and Context, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Francis Katamba, Paul Kerswill, Ruth Wodak, and Tony McEnery, 314–333. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J
1998 “Emergent grammar.” In The New Psychology of Language. Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, ed. by Michael Tomasello, 155–175. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hornscheidt, Antje
2002 “Die Nicht-Rezeption poststrukturalistischer Gender- und Sprachtheorien der Feministischen Linguistik im deutschsprachigen Raum.” In Neue Ergebnisse der empirischen Genderforschung, ed. by Tamara Faschingbauer, 5–51. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Janse, Mark, Brian D. Joseph, and Gunther de Vogelaer
2011 “Changing gender systems: A multidisciplinary approach.” Folia Linguistica 45(2): 237–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jobin, Bettina
2011 “Semantically driven change in German(ic) gender morphology.” Folia Linguistica 45(2): 317–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Hyoungsup
2010 “The use of collective numeral phrases in Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian: Morphosemantic approach.” Journal of Foreign Studies 6: 235–256.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2011 “The origin of the Proto-Indo-European gender system: Typological considerations.” Folia Linguistica 45(2): 435–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcato, Gianna, and Eva-Maria Thüne
2002 “Gender and female visibility in Italian.” In Gender Across Languages. The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Vol. 2, ed. by Marlis Hellinger, and Hadumod Bußmann, 187–217. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martyna, Wendy
1983 “Beyond the ‘he/man’ approach: The case for nonsexist language.” In Feminist Frontiers. Rethinking Sex, Gender, and Society, ed. by Laurel Richardson, and Verta Taylor, 10–17. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Matasović, Ranko
2004Gender in Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam
2006Introducing Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mills, Sara
2004 “Third wave feminist linguistics and the analysis of sexism.” Discourse Analysis Online 2: [URL]Google Scholar
2008Language and Sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce, and Fred C. Robinson
2007A Guide to Old English (7th edition). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko
2008 “Structural linguistic gender categories and discursive materialization: A deconstructionist analysis.” Indiana University Working Papers in Linguistics 8(3): 21–46.Google Scholar
2010b “Female-as-norm (FAN): A typology of female and feminine generics.” In Language in its Socio-Cultural Context. New Explorations in Gendered, Global and Media Uses, ed. by Markus Bieswanger, Heiko Motschenbacher, and Susanne Mühleisen, 35–67. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2011 “Taking Queer Linguistics further: Sociolinguistics and critical heteronormativity research.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 212: 149–179.Google Scholar
2014 “Grammatical gender as a challenge for language policy: The (im)possibility of non-heteronormative language use in German vs. English.” Language Policy 13(3): 243–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Some new perspectives on gendered language structures.” In Gender Across Languages. The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Vol. 4, ed. by Marlis Hellinger, and Heiko Motschenbacher, 27–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016“A discursive approach to structural gender linguistics.” Gender and Language 10(2): 149–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko, and Marija Weikert
2015 “Structural gender trouble in Croatian.” In Gender Across Languages. The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Vol. 4, ed. by Marlis Hellinger, and Heiko Motschenbacher, 49–95. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakassis, Constantine V
2013 “Citation and citationality.” Signs and Society 1(1): 51–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nissen, Uwe Kjaer
2002 “Gender in Spanish. Tradition and innovation.” In Gender Across Languages. The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Vol. 2, ed. by Marlis Hellinger, and Hadumod Bußmann, 251–279. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel
2009Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norri, Juhani
1998 “Gender-referential shifts in English.” English Studies 79(3): 270–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prewitt-Freilino, Jennifer L., T. Andrew Caswell, and Emmi K. Laakso
2012 “The gendering of language: A comparison of gender equality in countries with gendered, natural gender, and genderless languages.” Sex Roles 66(3/4): 268–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schulz, Muriel R
1975 “The semantic derogation of woman.” In Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance, ed. by Barrie Thorne, and Nancy Henley, 64–75. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Siemund, Peter, and Florian Dolberg
2011 “From lexical to referential gender: An analysis of gender change in medieval English based on two historical documents.” Folia Linguistica 45(2): 489–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
2005 “Axes of evals: Token versus type interdiscursivity.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1): 6–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thorne, Barrie, Cheris Kramarae, and Nancy Henley
(eds) 1983Language, Gender and Society. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme, and Muriel Norde
2013 “Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: Two case studies.” Language Sciences 36(1): 32–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
2013 “Gender maintenance and loss in Totenmålet, English, and other major Germanic varieties.” In In Search of Universal Grammar: From Old Norse to Zoque, ed. by Terje Lohndal, 77–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vezzosi, Letizia
2008 “Gender assignment in Old English.” In English Historical Linguistics 2006. Volume I: Syntax and Morphology, ed. by Maurizio Gotti, Marina Dossena, and Richard Dury, 89–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waksler, Rachelle
1995 “She’s a mensch and he’s a bitch: Neutralizing gender in the 90s.” English Today 11(2): 3–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, Benjamin D., and Allyson J. Weseley
2009 “¿Qué? Quoi? Do languages with grammatical gender promote sexist attitudes?Sex Roles 61(9/10): 634–643. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Kumar Kashyap, Abhishek
2016. The representation of gender in Bajjika grammar and discourse. In Gender, Language and the Periphery [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 264],  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Steriopolo, Olga
2021. Grammatical gender reversals: A morphosyntactic and sociopragmatic analysis. Open Linguistics 7:1  pp. 136 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.