Eastern boys and girls! Comparative linguistic anthropologies
of lesbian and gay communities, Kuala Lumpur and Sorwool
Motivated by social inclusion, lesbian and gay communities have long attempted
to negotiate languages and connected discourses. Social ascriptions act to
oppress these communities, thus grounding Cameron’s (1985) Feminism and
Linguistic theory. This practice of language negotiation significantly intensifies
in regions where religious piety (Hinduism, Christianity, Buddhism, Islam)
interacts with rigid social structure (Confucianism, Interdependency), mediating
social and cultural positioning. Consequently, members of LG communities
build linguistic affordances, thus (re)positioning selves so to negotiate ascribed
identities and marginalizations. Paradoxically, these communities model, or
draw from, discourses and dynamics of those larger sociocultural networks with
which intercommunal boundaries exist, so to contest or alleviate marginalizations,
thus repositioning self and other in sociocultural interstices.
Through a comparative framework, the current study
employs ethnography, as well as conversation and discourse analyses, of LG communities,
to explore ways in which these communities in Kuala Lumpur and Sorwool
(Seoul) develop and employ adroit language practices to struggle within social
spaces, and to contest positivist ascriptions.