Part of
Emotion in Multilingual InteractionEdited by Matthew T. Prior and Gabriele Kasper
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 266] 2016
► pp. 57–85
Edited by Matthew T. Prior and Gabriele Kasper
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 266] 2016
► pp. 57–85
Like Godzilla
Enactments and formulations in telling a disaster story in Japanese
The chapter examines how a second language speaker of Japanese tells a disaster story to an L1 Japanese-speaking recipient in ordinary conversation. Drawing on Goodwin’s (2013) notions of lamination and substrates, the study shows how the teller and recipient orient to the story as a stance object by selecting, assembling, and recycling different types of multisemiotic resources, including language forms, cultural references, prosody, ideophonic vocalizations, and embodied action such as gaze, facial expression, and gesture. By displaying emotions of different quality and intensity, and doing so with different configurations of semiotic practices, at different sequential moments, the participants show what they understand the current activity within the telling to be.
References
Akita, Kimi
2010 “An Embodied Semantic Analysis of Psychological Mimetics in Japanese.” Linguistics 48: 1195–1220. 
Baba, Junko
2003 “Pragmatic Function of Japanese Mimetics in the Spoken Discourse of Varying Emotive Intensity Levels.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1861–1889.
Besnier, Niko
1990 “Language and Affect.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 419–451.
Clancy, Patricia
1999 “The Socialization of Affect in Japanese Mother-Child Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1397–1421.
Cook, Haruko Minegishi
1992 “Meanings of Non-referential Indexes: A Case Study of the Japanese Sentence-final Particle Ne
.” Text 12: 507–539.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2012 “Exploring Affiliation in the Reception of Conversational Complaint Stories.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 113–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
de Fornel, Michel
1992 “The Return Gesture: Some Remarks on Context, Inference and Iconic Gesture.” In The Contextualization of Language, ed. by Peter Auer, and Aldo Di Luzio, 159–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dingemanse, Mark
2012 “Advances in the Cross-linguistic Study of Ideophones.” Language and Linguistics Compass 6: 654–672.
Ford, Cecilia E
2004 “Contingency and Units in Interaction.” Discourse Processes 6: 27–52.
Frazier, Stefan
2007 “Tellings of Remembrances ‘Touched Off’ by Student Reports in Group Work in Undergraduate Writing Classes.” Applied Linguistics 28: 189–210.
Goodwin, Charles
2007 “Environmentally Coupled Gestures.” In Gesture and the Dynamic Dimensions of Language, ed. by Susan D. Duncan, Justine Cassell, and Elena T. Levy, 195–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2013 “The Co-operative, Transformative Organization of Human Action and Knowledge.” Journal of Pragmatics 46: 8–23.
Goodwin, Marjorie, Asta Cekaite, and Charles Goodwin
2012 “Emotion as Stance.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 16–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hayashi, Makoto
2003 “Language and the Body as Resources for Collaborative Action: A Study of Word Searches in Japanese Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 36: 109–141.
Heath, Christian, Dirk von Lehn, Jason Cleverly, and Paul Luff
2012 “Revealing Surprise: The Local Ecology and the Transposition of Action. In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 212–234. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holt, Elizabeth
2000 “Reporting and Reacting: Concurrent Responses to Reported Speech.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 33: 425–454.
Ishida, Midori
2009 “Development of Interactional Competence: Changes in the Use of Ne in L2 Japanese During Study Abroad.” In Talk-in-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectives, ed. by Hanh thi Nguyen, and Gabriele Kasper, 351–385. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
Jefferson, Gail
2004 “ ‘At First I Thought’: A Normalizing Device for Extraordinary Events.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 131–167. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kita, Sotaro
1997 “Two-dimensional Semantic Analysis of Japanese Mimetics.” Linguistics 35: 379–415.
Kupetz, Maxi
2014 “Empathy Displays as Interactional Achievements – Multimodal and Sequential Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 61: 4–34.
Labov, William
1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Le Guen, Olivier
2011 “Materiality vs. Expressivity: The Use of Sensory Vocabulary in Yucatec Maya.” The Senses and Society 6: 117–125.
Mandelbaum, Jenny
2013 “Storytelling in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 492–507. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
McNeill, David
1992 Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
O’Reilly, Michelle
2005 “ ‘Active Noising’: The Use of Noises in Talk, the Case of Onomatopoeia, Abstract Sounds, and the Functions They Serve in Therapy.” Text 25: 745–762.
Peräkylä, Anssi, and Johanna Ruusuvuori
2006 “Facial Expression in an Assessment. In Video-analysis: Methodology and Methods, ed. by Hubert J. Knoblauch, Jürgen Raab, Hans-Georg Soeffner, and Bernt Schnettler, 127–142. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
2012 “Facial Expression and Interactional Regulation of Emotion.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 64–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peräkylä, Anssi, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2012 Emotion in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prior, Matthew. T
this volume). “Formulating and Scaling Emotionality in L2 Qualitative Research Interviews.”
Rae, John
2008 “Lexical Substitution as a Therapeutic Resource.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar, 62–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, Jeffrey D
2006 “Managing Trouble Responsibility and Relationships during Conversational Repair.” Communication Monographs 73: 137–161.
Sacks, Harvey
1974 “Some Considerations of a Story Told in Ordinary Conversations.” Poetics 15: 127–138.
1984 “On Doing ‘Being Ordinary’.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by John Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saigo, Hideki
Schegloff, Emmanuel A
2000 “When ‘Others’ Initiate Repair.” Applied Linguistics 21: 205–243.
Selting, Margret
2010 “Affectivity in Conversational Storytelling: An Analysis of Displays of Anger or Indignation in Complaint Stories.” Pragmatics 20: 229–277.
2012 “Complaint Stories and Subsequent Complaint Stories with Affect Displays.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 387–415.
Sidnell, Jack
2006 “Coordinating Gesture, Talk, and Gaze in Reenactments.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 39: 229–244.
Stivers, Tanya
2008 “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41: 31–57.
Sugita, Yuko
2012 “Minimal Affect Uptake in a Pre-climax Position of Conversational ‘Scary’ Stories.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1273–1289.
Svennevig, Jan
2008 “Trying the Easiest Solution First in Other-initiated Repair.” Journal of Pragmatics 40: 333–348.
Szatrowski, Polly
2010 “Creating Involvement in a Large Japanese Lecture by Telling the Story of a Haiku.” In Storytelling Across Japanese Conversational Genre, ed. by Polly Szatrowski, 267–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wilkinson, Ray, Suzanne Beeke, and Jane Maxim
2010 “Formulating Actions and Events with Limited Linguistic Resources: Enactment and Iconicity in Agrammatic Aphasic Talk.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43: 57–84.
Wooffitt, Robin
1992 Telling Tales of the Unexpected: The Organization of Factual Discourse. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.