Part of
Emotion in Multilingual Interaction
Edited by Matthew T. Prior and Gabriele Kasper
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 266] 2016
► pp. 153176
References
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
1999 “Coherent Voicing: On Prosody in Conversational Reported Speech.” In Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse: How to Create it and How to Describe it, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz, Uta Lenk, and Eija Ventola, 11–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “A Sequential Approach to Affect: The Case of ‘Disappointment’.” In Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions, ed. by Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso, and Jan Lindström, 94–123. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
2012a “Exploring Affiliation in the Reception of Conversational Complaint Stories.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 113–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b “Some Truths and Untruths about Final Intonation in Conversational Questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan P. de Ruiter, 123–145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W., and Elise Kärkkäinen
2012 “Taking a Stance on Emotion: Affect, Sequence, and Intersubjectivity in Dialogic Interaction.” Text & Talk 32 (4): 433–451.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul
1998 “Complaints about Transgression and Misconduct.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31: 295–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
1992 “Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Charles Goodwin
2000 “Emotion within Situated Activity.” In Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 239–257. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H., Asta Cekaite, and Charles Goodwin
2012 “Emotion as Stance.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 16–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haakana, Markku
2001 “Laughter as a Patient’s Resource: Dealing with Delicate Aspects of Medical Interaction.” Text & Talk 21: 187–220.Google Scholar
2007 “Reported Thought in Complaint Stories.” In Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Holt, and Rebecca Clift, 150–178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
2005 “Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk.” In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Kristine L. Fitch, and Robert E. Sanders, 103–147. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2011 “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John C., and D. Rod Watson
1979 “Formulations as Conversational Objects.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 123–162. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Heritage, John C., and Rod D. Watson
1980 “Aspects of the Properties of Formulations in Natural Conversations: Some Instances Analysed.” Semiotica 30 (3–4): 245–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hester, Sally, and Stephen Hester
2012 “Categorial Occasionality and Transformation: Analyzing Culture in Action.” Human Studies 35: 563–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin
(eds.) 1997aCulture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
1997b “Membership Categorization Analysis: An Introduction.” In Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, ed. by Stephen Hester, and Peter Eglin, 1–23. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth
1996 “Reporting on Talk: The Use of Direct Reported Speech in Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 29 (3): 219–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 “Reporting and Reacting: Concurrent Responses to Reported Speech.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 33: 425–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jayyusi, Lena
1984Categorization and the Moral Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1978 “Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation.” In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. by Jim Schenkein, 219–248. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984a “On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-positioned Matters.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 191–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1984b “On the Organization of Laughter in Talk about Troubles.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 346–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1988 “On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-talk in Ordinary Conversation.” Social Problems 35 (4): 418–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 “Is ‘No’ an Acknowledgment Token? Comparing American and British Uses of (+)/(−) Tokens.” Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1345–1383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail, and John R. E. Lee
1981 “The Rejection of Advice: Managing the Problematic Convergence of a “Troubles Tellingand a “Service Encounter.” Journal of Pragmatics 5: 399–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks, and Emanuel A. Schegloff
1987 “Notes on Laughter in the Pursuit of Intimacy.” In Talk and Social Organization, ed. by Graham Button, and John R. E. Lee, 152–205. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Jiwani, Yasmin, and John E. Richardson
2011 “Discourse, Ethnicity and Racism.” In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 241–262. London: SAGE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koshik, Irene
Lindström, Anna, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2012 “Affiliation in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 350–369. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Local, John K
2004 “Getting Back to Prior Talk: ‘And-uh(m)’ as a Back-connecting Device in British and American English.” In Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross-linguistic Studies from Conversation, ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Cecilia E. Ford, 377–400. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw
1923/1989 “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages.” In The Meaning of Meaning, ed. by C. A. Ogden and I. A. Richards, 296–336. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, Jenny
2012 “Storytelling in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 492–508. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, and Johanna Ruusuvuori
2006 “Facial expression in an Assessment.” In Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods, ed. by Hubert Knoblauch, Bernt Schnettler, Jürgen Raab, and Hans-Georg Soeffner, 127–142. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2012Emotion in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1986 “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies 9: 219–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prior, Matthew T
2016Emotion and Discourse in L2 Interviews. Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ruusuvuori, Johanna
2012 “Emotion, Affect and Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 330–349. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1974 “An Analysis of the Course of a Joke’s Telling in Conversation.” In Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, ed. by Richard Bauman, and Joel Sherzer, 337–353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandhu, Priti
2010Enactments of Discursive Empowerment in Narratives of Medium of Education by North Indian Women.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Second Language Studies, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.Google Scholar
2014a “The Interactional and Narrative Construction of Normative and Resistant Discourses about Hindi and English.” Applied Linguistics 35 (1): 29–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b“‘Who Does She Think She Is?’ Vernacular Medium and Failed Romance.” Journal of Language , Identity, and Education 13 (1): 16–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Stylizing Voices, Stances, and Identities Related to Medium of Education in India.” Multilingua: Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 34 (2): 211–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Vol: I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2008 “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Jack Sidnell
2005 “Introduction: Multimodal Interaction.” Semiotica 156 (1–4): 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1989Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Valk, Ineke
2003 “Right-Wing Parliamentary Discourse on Immigration in France.” Discourse and Society 14 (3): 309–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A
1992 “Discourse and the Denial of Racism.” Discourse and Society 3 (1): 87–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 “Political Discourse and Racism: Describing Others in Western Parliaments.” In The Language and Politics of Exclusion: Others in Discourse, ed. by Stephen Harold Riggins, 31–64. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Watson, D. Rod
1997 “Some General Reflections on ‘Categorization’ and ‘Sequence’ in the Analysis of Conversation.” In Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, ed. by Stephen Hester, and Peter Eglin, 49–76. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar