Cover not available
Part of
Relevance Theory: Recent developments, current challenges and future directions
Edited by Manuel Padilla Cruz
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 268] 2016
► pp. 173–

Distinguishing rhetorical from ironical questions

A relevance-theoretic account

| University of Neuchâtel

This chapter seeks to differentiate ironical questions from rhetorical questions, as they are often thought to share apparent similarities. Ironical questions are often taken as types of rhetorical questions because they orient towards an obvious answer and have some persuasive power. A relevance-theoretic account, however, shows that ironical questions result in different interpretive effects from those rhetorical questions yield. While rhetorical questions intentionally assert an implicit proposition bearing relevance, in ironical questions such a proposition is not relevant in itself, though it is still communicated. Ironical questions are contextually inaccurate and do not satisfy expectations of optimal relevance. The contextual absurdity of pragmatic expectations gives rise to specific attitudinal and non-propositonal effects.

Keywords: discoursive presuppositions, ironical questions, irony, pragmatic motivations, rhetorical questions
Published online: 20 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.268.07rae
References
Blakemore, Diane
1987 Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bonhomme, Marc
2005 “Flou et Polyvalence de la Question Rhétorique: L’Exemple des Fables de La Fontaine.” In Les états de la question, ed. by Corinne Rossari, et al., 191–209. Québec: Nota Bene.Google Scholar
Borillo, Andrée
1981 “Quelques Aspects de la Question Rhétorique en Français.” DRLAV 25: 1–33.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert, and Richard Gerrig
1984 “On the Pretense Theory of Irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113 (1): 121–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald
1980 Le Dire et le Dit. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Gardes-Tamine, Joëlle
1992 La Stylistique. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond
2000 “Irony in Talk among Friends.” Metaphor and Symbol 15: 5–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goto, Risa
2011 “Relevance Theoretic Analysis of the Properties and Understanding Process of Rhetorical Questions.” Annual Report of Graduate Division of Human Culture 26: 1–14.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Rexach, Javier
1998 “Rhetorical Questions, Relevance and Scales.” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 11: 139–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, Chong
2002 “Interpreting Interrogatives as Rhetorical Questions.” Lingua 112 (3): 201–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
1991 “L’Acte de Question et l’Acte d’Assertion: Opposition Discrète ou Continuum?” In La question, ed. by Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni, 87–111. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.Google Scholar
Raeber, Thierry
2011 L’Ironie; Réactualisation de Pensée et Contenus non Posés: Une Approche Pragmatique. MA diss., University of Neuchâtel. Google Scholar
Recchia, Holly E., Nina Howe, Hildy S. Ross, and Shirley Alexander
2010 “Children’s Understanding and Production of Verbal Irony in Family Conversations.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 28 (2): 255–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohde, Hannah
2006 “Rhetorical Questions as Redundant Interrogatives.” San Diego Linguistic Papers 2: 133–168.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerry M
1971 “Queclaratives.” Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 7: 223–232.Google Scholar
Saussure, Louis de
2012 “Cognitive Pragmatic Ways into Discourse Analysis. The Case of Discursive Presuppositions.” Łodz Papers in Pragmatics 8 (1): 37–60.Google Scholar
Searle, John R
1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: 
Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simonin, Olivier
2006 “Ironie: Voie Etrange et Voix Etrangères.” Bulletin de la Société de Stylistique Anglaise 27: 27–44.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1981 “Irony and the Use-Mention Distinction.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 295–318. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1986/1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 
Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
2006 “The Pragmatics of Verbal Irony: Echo or Pretence?” Lingua 116 (10): 1722–1743. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Irony and Metarepresentation.” UCL Working papers in linguistics 21: 183–226.Google Scholar
2013 “Irony Comprehension: A Developmental Perspective.” Journal of pragmatics 59 (A): 40–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
1998 “Mood and the Analysis of Non-Declarative Sentences.” In Pragmatics: Critical Concepts, Vol. II, ed. by Asa Kasher, 262–289. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1992 “On Verbal Irony.” Lingua 87 (1): 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Giora, Rachel, Inbal Jaffe, Israela Becker & Ofer Fein
2018. Strongly attenuating highly positive concepts. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 16:1 ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.