Article published in:Relevance Theory: Recent developments, current challenges and future directions
Edited by Manuel Padilla Cruz
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 268] 2016
► pp. 173–
Distinguishing rhetorical from ironical questions
A relevance-theoretic account
This chapter seeks to differentiate ironical questions from rhetorical questions, as they are often thought to share apparent similarities. Ironical questions are often taken as types of rhetorical questions because they orient towards an obvious answer and have some persuasive power. A relevance-theoretic account, however, shows that ironical questions result in different interpretive effects from those rhetorical questions yield. While rhetorical questions intentionally assert an implicit proposition bearing relevance, in ironical questions such a proposition is not relevant in itself, though it is still communicated. Ironical questions are contextually inaccurate and do not satisfy expectations of optimal relevance. The contextual absurdity of pragmatic expectations gives rise to specific attitudinal and non-propositonal effects.
Keywords: discoursive presuppositions, ironical questions, irony, pragmatic motivations, rhetorical questions
Published online: 20 October 2016
Clark, Herbert, and Richard Gerrig
Gutiérrez Rexach, Javier
Recchia, Holly E., Nina Howe, Hildy S. Ross, and Shirley Alexander
Sadock, Jerry M.
Saussure, Louis de
Searle, John R.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
Cited by 1 other publications
Giora, Rachel, Inbal Jaffe, Israela Becker & Ofer Fein
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.