The paper analyzes how recipients infer the purpose of a prior query. While such inferences are not directly observable, analyzing responses to queries sheds light on ways in which recipients likely understood them. The paper identifies three types of sequences in which recipients respond to the inferred purpose of the prior query. To infer a purpose of a query, recipients draw on the form of the query, the immediately prior interaction, and assumedly shared knowledge about the current situation. It concludes with a discussion of the relationship between inferring the purpose of a prior query and participants’ pervasively addressing the question ‘why that now’.
1993"Reformulating the Question: A Device for Answering/Not Answering Questions in News Interviews and Press Conferences."Text 3 (2): 159–188.
Heritage, John
2013"Epistemics in Conversation." In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 370–394. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Jefferson, Gail
1980"On 'Trouble-Premonitory' Response to Inquiry."Sociological Inquiry 50 (3–4): 153–185.
Koshik, I
2002"A Conversation Analytic Study of Yes/No Questions which Convey Reversed Polarity Assertions."Journal of Pragmatics 34 (12): 1851–1877.
Lee, Seung-Hee
2011"Responding at a Higher Level: Activity Progressivity in Calls for Service."Journal of Pragmatics 43: 904–917.
Lee, Seung-Hee
2013"Response Design in Conversation." In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 415–432. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Levinson, Stephen C
1981"Some Pre-Observations on the Modelling of Dialogue."Discourse Processes 4 (2): 93–116.
Pomerantz, Anita
1988"Offering a Candidate Answer: An Information Seeking Strategy."Communication Monographs 55 (4): 360–373.
Raymond, Geoffrey
2003"Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding."American Sociological Review 68 (6): 939–967.
Sacks, Harvey
1992Lectures on Conversation (Vol. 1, 2). Oxford: Blackwell.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1998"Reply to Wetherell."Discourse and Society 9 (3): 413–416.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks
1973"Opening up Closings."Semiotica 8: 289–327.
Stivers, Tanya
2008"Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation."Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 31–57.
Stivers, Tanya, and Makoto Hayashi
2010"Transformative Answers: One Way to Resist a Question's Constraints."Language in Society 39: 1–25.
Walker, Traci, Paul Drew, and John Local
2011"Responding Indirectly."Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2434–2451.
Cited by
Cited by 20 other publications
Bolden, Galina B., John Heritage & Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2023. Doing “Care Work” in Emergency Service Calls. Western Journal of Communication 87:4 ► pp. 626 ff.
Haugh, Michael
2016. Prompting Social Action as a Higher-Order Pragmatic Act. In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 9], ► pp. 167 ff.
Haugh, Michael
2022. Action Ascription, Accountability and Inference. In Action Ascription in Interaction, ► pp. 81 ff.
Heritage, John & Chase Wesley Raymond
2021. Preference and Polarity: Epistemic Stance in Question Design. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Küttner, Uwe-A.
2020.
Tying Sequences Together with the [
That’s
+
Wh
-Clause] Format: On (Retro-)Sequential Junctures in Conversation
. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53:2 ► pp. 247 ff.
La Mattina, Nicco A.
2023. Transposition, not translation: Recuperating attentionality on Pantelleria, Sicily. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 33:3 ► pp. 311 ff.
Mazeland, Harrie
2019. Activities as Discrete Organizational Domains. In Embodied Activities in Face-to-face and Mediated Settings, ► pp. 29 ff.
Moore, Cassidy R. & Jeffrey D. Robinson
2024. An action-specific examination of the role of answerers’ gaze orientation in managing transition relevance. Discourse Processes► pp. 1 ff.
Prettner, Robert, Hedwig te Molder & Bogdana Humă
2023. How a ‘good parent’ decides on childhood vaccination. Demonstrating independence and deliberation during Dutch healthcare visits. Sociology of Health & Illness
Williams, Val, Joe Webb, Sandra Dowling & Marina Gall
2019. Direct and indirect ways of managing epistemic asymmetries when eliciting memories. Discourse Studies 21:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
Yu, Guodong, Yaxin Wu & Paul Drew
2019. Couples bickering: Disaffiliation and discord in Chinese conversation. Discourse Studies 21:4 ► pp. 458 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 567 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.