The paper analyzes how recipients infer the purpose of a prior query. While such inferences are not directly observable, analyzing responses to queries sheds light on ways in which recipients likely understood them. The paper identifies three types of sequences in which recipients respond to the inferred purpose of the prior query. To infer a purpose of a query, recipients draw on the form of the query, the immediately prior interaction, and assumedly shared knowledge about the current situation. It concludes with a discussion of the relationship between inferring the purpose of a prior query and participants’ pervasively addressing the question ‘why that now’.
Clayman, Steven E. 1993. "Reformulating the Question: A Device for Answering/Not Answering Questions in News Interviews and Press Conferences."Text 3 (2): 159–188.
Heritage, John. 2013. "Epistemics in Conversation." In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 370–394. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Koshik, I. 2002. "A Conversation Analytic Study of Yes/No Questions which Convey Reversed Polarity Assertions."Journal of Pragmatics 34 (12): 1851–1877.
Lee, Seung-Hee. 2011. "Responding at a Higher Level: Activity Progressivity in Calls for Service."Journal of Pragmatics 43: 904–917.
Lee, Seung-Hee. 2013. "Response Design in Conversation." In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 415–432. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1981. "Some Pre-Observations on the Modelling of Dialogue."Discourse Processes 4 (2): 93–116.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1988. "Offering a Candidate Answer: An Information Seeking Strategy."Communication Monographs 55 (4): 360–373.
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. "Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding."American Sociological Review 68 (6): 939–967.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1998. "Reply to Wetherell."Discourse and Society 9 (3): 413–416.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks. 1973. "Opening up Closings."Semiotica 8: 289–327.
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. "Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation."Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 31–57.
Stivers, Tanya, and Makoto Hayashi. 2010. "Transformative Answers: One Way to Resist a Question's Constraints."Language in Society 39: 1–25.
Walker, Traci, Paul Drew, and John Local. 2011. "Responding Indirectly."Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2434–2451.
Cited by (22)
Cited by 22 other publications
Küttner, Uwe-A. & Beatrice Szczepek Reed
2024. Request for confirmation sequences in British and American English. Open Linguistics 10:1
Moore, Cassidy R. & Jeffrey D. Robinson
2024. An action-specific examination of the role of answerers’ gaze orientation in managing transition relevance. Discourse Processes 61:3 ► pp. 142 ff.
Prettner, Robert, Hedwig te Molder & Bogdana Humă
2024. How a ‘good parent’ decides on childhood vaccination. Demonstrating independence and deliberation during Dutch healthcare visits. Sociology of Health & Illness 46:4 ► pp. 664 ff.
Prettner, Robert, Hedwig te Molder & Jeffrey D. Robinson
2024. The Delicate Situation of Childhood Vaccination: On the Dispreferredness of Soliciting Parents’ Intent to Vaccinate. Health Communication► pp. 1 ff.
Bolden, Galina B., John Heritage & Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2021. Preference and Polarity: Epistemic Stance in Question Design. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Küttner, Uwe-A.
2020.
Tying Sequences Together with the [
That’s
+
Wh
-Clause] Format: On (Retro-)Sequential Junctures in Conversation
. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53:2 ► pp. 247 ff.
Mazeland, Harrie
2019. Activities as Discrete Organizational Domains. In Embodied Activities in Face-to-face and Mediated Settings, ► pp. 29 ff.
Williams, Val, Joe Webb, Sandra Dowling & Marina Gall
2019. Direct and indirect ways of managing epistemic asymmetries when eliciting memories. Discourse Studies 21:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
Yu, Guodong, Yaxin Wu & Paul Drew
2019. Couples bickering: Disaffiliation and discord in Chinese conversation. Discourse Studies 21:4 ► pp. 458 ff.
Seuren, Lucas M.
2018. Assessing Answers: Action Ascription in Third Position. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Haugh, Michael
2016. Prompting Social Action as a Higher-Order Pragmatic Act. In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 9], ► pp. 167 ff.
Haugh, Michael
2022. Action Ascription, Accountability and Inference. In Action Ascription in Interaction, ► pp. 81 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 567 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.