Cover not available
Part of
Enabling Human Conduct: Studies of talk-in-interaction in honor of Emanuel A. Schegloff
Edited by Geoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner and John Heritage
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 273] 2017
► pp. 145–166

Interactional uses of acknowledgment tokens

‘ung’ and ‘e’ as responses to multi-unit turns in Korean conversation

In this article we explore the situated meanings of two acknowledgment tokens, ung and e, in Korean conversations. We demonstrate how ung and e, which may seem interchangeable at first sight, can actually be deployed for distinct interactional functions by marking different interactional orientations the speaker has toward the turn-so-far. Specifically, ung is used as a typical continuer that treats the turn-so-far as an in-progress multi-unit turn, whereas e is used to provide the speaker’s appreciation which has been made relevant by the turn-so-far, e.g., in response to the prior assessment, the newsworthiness of the preceding talk, or particularly emphasized telling. This article thus adds evidence that acknowledgment tokens do not behave in interaction as an undifferentiated class.
Keywords: ung, e, acknowledgment tokens, response tokens, continuers, Korean, multi-unit turns
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Analysis
  • 3.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Abbreviations
Published online: 24 May 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.273.08oh
References (41)
References
Clancy, Patricia M., Sandra A. Thompson, Ryoko Suzuki, and Hongyin Tao. 1996. “The Conversational Use of Reactive Tokens in English, Japanese and Mandarin.” Journal of Pragmatics 26: 355–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drummond, Kent, and Robert Hopper. 1993a. “Back Channels Revisited: Acknowledgment Tokens and Speakership Incipiency.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26: 157–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993b. “Some Uses of Yeah .” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26: 203–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Starkey J. 1972. “Some Signals and Rules for Taking Speaking Turns in Conversations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23: 283–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1974. “On the Structure of Speaker-Auditor Interaction during Speaking Turns.” Language in Society 2: 161–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duncun, Starkey J., and Donald W. Fiske. 1977. Face-to-Face Interaction: Research, Methods, Theory. Hillsdale and NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gardner, Rod. 1997. “The Conversation Object Mm: A Weak and Variable Acknowledging Token.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 20 (2): 131–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1986. “Between and Within: Alternative and Sequential Treatments of Continuers and Assessments.” Human Studies 9: 205–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Recognizing Assessable Names.” In Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In Honor of Robert Hopper, ed. by Phillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron, and Jenny Mandelbaum, 151–161. Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Guthrie, Anna. 1997. “On the Systematic Deployment of Okay and Mm Hmm in Academic Advising Sessions.” Pragmatics 7: 397–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by John M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1989. “Current Developments in Conversation Analysis.” In Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Derek Roger and Peter Bull, 21–47. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
. 1998. “ Oh-prefaced Responses to Inquiry.” Language in Society 27: 291–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1997. “The Northridge Earthquake Conversations: The Floor Structure and the ‘Loop’ Sequence in Japanese Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 28: 661–693. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1979. “A Technique for Inviting Laugher and Its Subsequent Acceptance Declination.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psthas, 79–96. New York: Irvington Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
. 1984. “Notes on a Systematic Deployment of the Acknowledgment Tokens ‘Yeah’ and ‘Mm Hm’.” Papers in Linguistics 17: 197–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene. H. 1991. “On the Syntax of Sentences-in-Progress.” Language in Society 20: 441–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 1967. “Some Functions of Gaze Direction in Social Interaction.” Acta Psychologica 26: 22–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Haeyeon. 2004. “Backchannels as Achievements of Social Interaction in Korean Conversation.” Sahoe Onohak [Sociolinguistics] 12: 65–93.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1999. “Phrasal Unit Boundaries and Organization of Turns and Sequences in Korean Conversation.” Human Studies 22: 425–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun, and Kyung-Hee Suh. 1994. “The Discourse Connective Nikka in Korean Conversation.” In Japanese/Korean Linguistics Vol. 4, ed. by Noriko Akatsuka, 113–129. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko. 1986. “On Back-Channel Behavior in Japanese and English Casual Conversation.” Linguistics 24: 1079–1108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. “Conversation Management in Contrast: Listener Response in Japanese and American English.” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 397–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazeland, Harrie. 1990. “‘Yes’, ‘No’ and ‘Mhm’: Variations in Acknowledgment Choices.” In Les Formes de la Conversation, ed. by Bernard Conein, Mochel de Fornel, and Louis Quéré, 251–282. Paris: CNET.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael. 2003. “Talking Back: ‘Small’ Interactional Response Tokens in Everyday Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26 (1): 33–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mizutani, Nobuko. 1982. “The Listener’s Response in Japanese Conversation.” Sociolinguistic Newsletter 13: 33–38.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversational Analysis, ed. by John M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1982. “Discourse as Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of ‘Uh Huh’ and Other Things that Come between Sentences.” In Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics: Analyzing Discourse, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 71–93. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. “When ‘Others’ Initiate Repair.” Applied Linguistics 21: 205–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena. 2001. Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. “Recipient Activities: The Particle No as a Go-Ahead Response in Finnish Conversations.” In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, 165–195. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2004. “‘No no no’ and Other Types of Multiple Sayings in Social Interaction.” Human Communication Research 30 (2): 260–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Hiroko. 1999. Turn-taking in Japanese Conversation: A Study in Grammar and Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Turn Projection in Japanese Talk-in-interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 33: 1–38.Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin, and Sandra, A. Thompson. 1991. “English Backchannels in Mandarin Conversations: A Case Study of Superstratum Pragmatic 'Interference'.” Journal of Pragmatics 16: 209–223.Google Scholar
White, Sheida. 1989. “Backchannels across Cultures: A Study of Americans and Japanese.” Language in Society 18: 59–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yngve, Victor H. 1970. “On Getting a Word in Edgewise.” In Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. by Mary Ann Campbell and James Lindholm, 567–578. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Young, Richard, and Jina Lee. 2004. “Identifying Units in Interaction: Reactive Tokens in Korean and English Conversations.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 8: 380–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Don H. 1993. “Acknowledgment Tokens and Speakership Incipiency Revisited.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26: 179–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Wang, Wei
2024. Response particles in Mandarin conversation. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal DOI logo
Ju, Hee
2019. Conveying the Point of Telling a Story in First-Person Narratives. The Korean Language in America 23:2 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. OKAY across Languages [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 34], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.