Cover not available
Part of
Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics
Edited by István Kecskés and Stavros Assimakopoulos
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 274] 2017
► pp. 75–102

Chapter 4
“Burn the antifa traitors at the stake…”

Transnational political cyber-exchanges, proximisation of emotions

| University of Cyprus
| University of Cyprus
The present contribution examines the use of lingua franca in a transnational computer mediated corpus, focusing on the extreme-right Greek political party Golden Dawn. Our data include the visual identities, pseudonyms and verbal comments of discussants. We investigate the processes through which an emergent common ground is built in this on-line far-right discourse, mainly through co-constructed salient lexical and conceptual units. This salience helps proximise emotions and in particular the notion of a threat which is at the heart of far-right discourse argumentation. We shed light on the discursive strategies put in place on the individual level with a view to creating, perpetuating and strengthening the immanency and closeness of the threat, which allegedly legitimises a particular course of action. When comparing our findings with the results of previous studies focused on other Greek and French data we argue, on the basis of the presence of common features, for the existence of a dedicated lingua franca which could be called (extreme)-right newspeak.
Keywords: cyberdiscourse, emotions, common ground, far-right discourse-proximisation, Golden Dawn
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical considerations
    • 2.1Ideological common ground defining far-right discourse
    • 2.2Salience of lexical units defining axiological values of far-right discourse
    • 2.3Cyber communication context: Proximising a threat
  • 3.Data, typology, methodology
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Methodology
  • 4.Analysis of avatars and pseudonyms
    • 4.1Quantitative results
    • 4.2Proximisation of positive emotions towards the Self
      • 4.2.1Spatial proximisation
      • 4.2.2Temporal proximisation
      • 4.2.3Axiological values
    • 4.3proximisation of negative emotions towards the Other
      • 4.3.1Discrediting the Other
      • 4.3.2Resisting the Other
  • 5.Salience of lexical units and emerging common ground in comments
    • 5.1Sarcasm, hostility and disparaging metaphors
    • 5.2Main salient lexical units
      • 5.2.1The Self
      • 5.2.2The Other
      • 5.2.3The party and its ideology
    • 5.3Battle over salient lexical meanings
    • 5.4Proximising the Threat
  • 6.Proximising values to build a far-right newspeak
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 14 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.274.05bai
References (37)
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis K. 2000. “Non-standard Spellings in Media texts: The Case of German Fanzines.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 4: 514–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bal, Mieke. 2002. Travelling Concepts in the Humanities: A Rough Guide. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Baider, Fabienne, and Maria Constantinou. 2014. “Language of Cyber-politics: ‘Imaging/imagining’ Communities.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 10: 213–242 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Jean-Marie Le Pen vs. Marine Le Pen: Un ‘Ethos Émotif’ Différent?” Studia Romanica Posnanesia. Poznan: Verbalisation de l’Émotion dans le Discours Médiatique 42: 3–19.Google Scholar
Baider, Fabienne. 2013. “The Saliency Hypothesis: Affects and Emotions.” In Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics, ed. by Istvan Kecskes, and Jesús Romero-Trillo. 7–25. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2010. “Axiological Aspects of proximisation.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 392–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013a. “proximisation Theory and Critical Discourse Studies: A Promising Connection?” International Review of Pragmatics 5: 292–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. proximisation: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2005. “Discourse Space Theory: Geometry, Brain and Shifting Viewpoints.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3: 78–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davydova, Olga. 2008. “The Bronze Soldier Goes Transnational: Mediascapes and the Formation of Identities in Internet Discussions.” Ethnopolitics 7: 391–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derks, Daantje, Agneta H. Fischer, and Arjan E. R. Bos. 2008. “The Role of Emotion in Computer-mediated Communication: A Review.” Computers in Human Behavior 24: 766–785. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1991. Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2006. “Discourse and Manipulation.” Discourse & Society 17: 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drouin, Patrick. 2003. “Term Extraction Using Non-technical Corpora as a Point of Leverage.” Terminology, 9: 99–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Cillia, Rudolf, Martin Reisigl, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse Society 10: 149–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elgenius, Gabriella. 2005. Expressions of Nationhood: National Symbols and Ceremonies in Contemporary Europe. PhD thesis, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel. 1997. “Understanding Figurative and Literal Language: The Graded Salience Hypothesis.” Cognitive Linguistics 7: 183–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. On Our Mind: Salience, Context and Figurative Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grewal, Inderpal. 2005. Transnational America: Feminisms, Diasporas, Neoliberalisms. Durham, NC: Duke University Press London. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivaldi, Gilles. 2012. “Permanences et Évolutions de l’Idéologie Frontiste.” In Le Front National: Mutations de l’Extrême-droite Française, ed. by Pascal Dewit, 95–112. Brussels: Editions Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. 2008. “Dueling Context: A Dynamic Model of Meaning.” Journal of Pragmatics 40: 385–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan, and Fenghui Zhang. 2009. “Activating, Seeking and Creating Common Ground: A Socio-cognitive Approach.” Pragmatics and Cognition 17: 331–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. 2011. “Interculturality and Intercultural Pragmatics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Intercultural Communication, ed. by Jane Jackson, 67–84. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2013. Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landry, Elaine M. 2000. “Scrolling Around the New Organization: The Potential for Conflict in the On-line Environment.” Negotiation Journal 16, 133–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Nonna. 2012. “De Jean-Marie à Marine Le Pen: l’Électorat du Front National a-t-il Changé?” In Le Front National: Mutations de l’Extrême-droite Française, ed. by Pascal Dewit, 143–160. Brussels: Editions Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Michard, Claire. 1988. “Some Socio-enunciative Characteristics of Scientific Texts Concerning the Sexes, the Nature of the Right.” In The Nature of the Right: A Feminist Analysis of Order Patterns, ed. by Gill Seidel, 27–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39: 541–563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2007. “Which Role Do Metaphors Play in Racial Prejudice? The Function of Anti-Semitic Imagery in Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’.” Patterns of Prejudice 41: 21–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, Patrick B., and Andrew J. Flanagin. 2003. “Reconceptualizing ‘Flaming’ and Other Problematic Messages.” New Media & Society 5: 69–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reutenauer, Coralie, Mathieu Valette, and Evelyne Jacquey 2010. “De L’annotation Sémique Globale à L’interprétation Locale.” Paper presented at the Arco’09 conference, 9–11 November 2009, Rouen.
Taggard, Paul. 2000. Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Liebhart Karin. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2011. Cyberpragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Baider, Fabienne & Maria Constantinou
2019. Discours de haine dissimulée, discours alternatifs et contre-discours. Semen :47 DOI logo
Baider, Fabienne & Maria Constantinou
2020. Covert hate speech. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2 ► pp. 262 ff. DOI logo
Kecskes, Istvan
2018. Intercultural Pragmatics. In Handbuch Pragmatik, ► pp. 140 ff. DOI logo
Assimakopoulos, Stavros, Fabienne H. Baider & Sharon Millar
2017. Analysis of Online Comments to News Reports. In Online Hate Speech in the European Union [SpringerBriefs in Linguistics, ], ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Assimakopoulos, Stavros, Fabienne H. Baider & Sharon Millar
2017. Concluding Remarks. In Online Hate Speech in the European Union [SpringerBriefs in Linguistics, ], ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.