Cover not available
Part of
Implicitness: From lexis to discourse
Edited by Piotr Cap and Marta Dynel
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 276] 2017
► pp. 1–12

Chapter 1
Implicitness

Familiar terra incognita in pragmatics

| University of Łódź
| University of Łódź
The aim of this chapter is to shed light on the concept behind the label “implicitness”, which is ubiquitous in the pragmatic scholarship but has rarely constituted the focus of attention per se. In the teeth of the intuitive use of the label, which seems synonymous with “indirectness” used in some research traditions, an organizing conception of implicitness phenomena is provided and advanced. Implicitness is presented as encompassing both the use and the system side and, importantly, the cases where different-size phrasal, sentential and textual carriers of indirect meaning can be identified. This view is reflected in the content of the present volume.
Keywords: implicitness, indirectness, implicit meaning, research in implicitness, levels of analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Explicating implicitness
  • 2.This collection: Aims and general structure
  • 3.Chapter-by-chapter overview
  • References
Published online: 30 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.276.01dyn
References (26)
References
Ariel, Mira. 2004. “Most.” Language. 80: 658−706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Revisiting the Typology of Pragmatic Interpretations.” Intercultural Pragmatics 13: 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla. 2011. “Indeterminacy in Dialogue.” Language and Dialogue 1: 21−43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behrens, Bergljot, and Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen. 2009. “Introduction to Contributions in ‘Structuring Information in Discourse: The Explicit/Implicit Dimension’.” Oslo Studies in Language 1: 2−16.Google Scholar
Bertuccelli Papi, Marcella. 2000. Implicitness in Text and Discourse. Pisa: Edizoni ETS.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Implicitness.” In Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights vol. I: Key Notions in Pragmatics, ed. by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman, 139−162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhat, Darbhe Narayana Shankara. 2004. Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brandon, Robert. 1998. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 2015. From Empiricism to Expressivism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Wayne A. 2005. Nondescriptive Meaning and Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1972. Dire et ne pas dire. Principes de sémantique linguistiques. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2013. “Being Cooperatively Impolite: Grice’s Model in the Context of (Im)Politeness Theories.” In Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics, ed. by Istvan Kecskes and Jesus Romero-Trillo, 55−83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2015. Im/Politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoogervorst, Jan, Henk van der Flier, and Paul Koopman. 2004. “Implicit Communication in Organisations: The Impact of Culture, Structure and Management Practices on Employee Behaviour.” Journal of Managerial Psychology 19: 288−311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirsner, Kim, Craig Speelman, Murray Maybery, Angela O’Brien-Malone, Mike Anderson, and Colin MacLeod (eds). 1998. Implicit and Explicit Mental Processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kurzon, Dennis. 2007. “Towards a Typology of Silence.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1673–1688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lepore, Ernie, and Matthew Stone. 2015. Imagination and Convention: Distinguishing Grammar and Inference in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. “Minimization and Conversational Inference.” In The Pragmatic Perspective: Selected Papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference, ed. by Marcella Bertuccelli Papi and Jef Verschueren, 61−129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morency, Patrick, Steve Oswald, and Louis de Saussure. 2008. “Explicitness, Implicitness and Commitment Attribution: A Cognitive Pragmatic Approach.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22: 197–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola. 1986. Pragmatics as Implicitness. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 2007. Detto non detto. Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1980. “The Background of Meaning.” In Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, ed. by John RJohn R. Searle, Ferenc Kiefer, and Manfred Bierwisch, 11–41. Boston: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shopen, Tim. 1973. “Ellipsis as Grammatical Indeterminacy.” Foundations of Language 10: 65−77.Google Scholar
Tanck, Sharyl. 2002. “Speech Acts Sets of Refusal and Complaints: A Comparison of Native and Non-native English Speakers’ Production.” TESOL Working Papers ([URL] accessed September 1, 2015).Google Scholar
Van Mulken, Margot, Renske Van Enschot, and Hans Hoeken. 2005. “Levels of Implicitness in Magazine Advertisements.” Document Design 13: 155−164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xia, Mu, Yun Huang, Wenjing Duan, and Andrew Whinston. 2007. “Implicit Many-to-One Communication in Online Communities.” Communities and Technologies 27: 265−274.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.