Chapter published in:
Implicitness: From lexis to discourseEdited by Piotr Cap and Marta Dynel
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 276] 2017
► pp. 15–36
Chapter 2What’s a reading?
Mira Ariel | Tel Aviv University
Linguists sometimes assume that the readings associated with linguistic utterance, both explicit and implicit, are self-evident. I here problematize the concept of a reading associated with linguistic expressions, and restrict it to interpretations systematically intended by the speaker using the utterance. This is a stronger condition than is sometimes adopted, namely, meshing the utterance with the objective reality that must lie behind the utterance (according to the speaker). I reanalyze assumptions commonly considered part of the reading associated with and, or and scalar quantifiers as Background or as Truth-Compatible inferences. On this account, these assumptions do not fall under the speaker’s communicative intention, and therefore do not constitute readings.
Keywords: what is said, Truth-Compatible inferences, Background assumptions, scalar quantifiers, explicature
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Tests identifying interpretation status
- 2.1(Un)faithful report tests
- 2.2The including/excluded test
- 3. And-coherence inferences
- 4.Scalar quantifiers
- 5.So-called exclusive or interpretations
- 6.Summary and conclusions
-
Notes -
References
Published online: 30 June 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.276.02ari
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.276.02ari
References
Ariel, Mira, and Caterina Mauri
in press. Why use ‘or’? Linguistics.
Bach, Kent
Carston, Robyn
Koenig, Jean-Pierre
Noveck, Ira A
Searle, John R