Cover not available
Part of
Implicitness: From lexis to discourse
Edited by Piotr Cap and Marta Dynel
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 276] 2017
► pp. 121–146

Chapter 6
Implicitness via overt untruthfulness

Grice on Quality-based figures of speech

| University of Łódź
Grice’s (1989a [1975], 1989b [1978]) conversational implicature is a salient manifestation of implicitness, whilst the four figures of speech contingent on flouting the first maxim of Quality constitute an important group of phenomena that promote conversational implicature. Implicitness is then central to the figures of: metaphor, irony, hyperbole and meiosis. This chapter gives an exegesis of Grice’s view of these Quality-based figures of speech, which enjoy a special status in his framework of conversational logic. The critical analysis is performed against the backdrop of the pertinent neo-Gricean and post-Gricean scholarship. This chapter thus sheds new light on selected vexing issues in Grice’s philosophy, with some being (unjustly) taken for granted or oversimplified, and other ones being the subject of ongoing debates.
Keywords: implicature, saying, Quality, truthfulness, overt untruthfulness, flouting, Grice, irony, metaphor, meiosis, hyperbole
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Maxim nonfulfilment as the source of implicature
  • 3.Quality and truthfulness
    • 3.1Truthfulness and saying
  • 4.Grice’s vew of metaphor, irony, hyperbole and meiosis and criticism thereof
  • 5.Quality-based figures as an alleged flaw in Grice’s proposal of implicature
  • Epilogue
  • Author queries
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.276.06dyn
References (60)
References
Akmajian, Adrian, Richard Demers, Ann Farmer, and Robert M. Harnish. 2001. Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baptista, Luca. 2014. “Say What? On Grice on What Is Said.” European Journal of Philosophy 22 (1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benton, Matthew. 2014. “Gricean Quality.” Noûs. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhaya Nair, Rukimi. 1985. “Telling Lies: Some Literary and Other Violations of Grice’s Maxim of Quality.” Nottingham Linguistic Circular 14: 53–71.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 1983. “Asserting.” Noûs 17: 637–650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Elisabeth. 2006. “Contextualism, Metaphor and What Is Said.” Mind & Language 21(3): 280–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, Herbert. 2000. “On Necessary Conditions for Verbal Irony Comprehension.” Pragmatics and Cognition 8: 277–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, Herbert, and Jennifer O’Brien. 2000. “Contrast and Pragmatics in Figurative Language: Anything Understatement Can Do, Irony Can Do Better.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1557–1583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Bethan. 2000. “Grice’s Cooperative Principle: Getting the Meaning Across.” Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 8: 1–26.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Grice’s Cooperative Principle: Meaning and Rationality.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 2308–2331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dinges, Alexander. 2015. “Innocent Implicatures.” Journal of Pragmatics 87: 54–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2008. “There Is Method in the Humorous Speaker’s Madness: Humour and Grice’s model.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4(1): 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011a. “Turning Speaker Meaning on Its Head: Non-Verbal Communication and Intended Meanings.” Pragmatics and Cognition 3: 422–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011b. “A Web of Deceit: A neo-Gricean View on Types of Verbal Deception.” International Review of Pragmatics 3(2): 137–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013a. “Being Cooperatively Impolite: Grice’s Model in the Context of (Im)Politeness Theories.” In Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics, ed. by Istvan Kecskes and Jesus Romero-Trillo, 55–83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. “Irony from a Neo-Gricean Perspective: On Untruthfulness and Evaluative Implicature.” Intercultural Pragmatics 10: 403–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Intention to Deceive, Bald-Faced Lies, and Deceptive Implicature: Insights into Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface .” Intercultural Pragmatics 12: 309–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016a. “Contrasting and Combining Covert and Overt Untruthfulness: On Lying, Deception, Irony and Metaphor.” Pragmatics & Cognition 23: 175–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. "The irony of irony: Irony based on truthfulness." Corpus Pragmatics 1: 3-36.Google Scholar
Fogelin, R. 1988. Figuratively Speaking. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1983. “The Domain of Pragmatics.” In Language and Communication, ed. by Jack Richards, and Richard Schmidt, 29–59. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Garmendia, Joana. 2010. “Irony Is Critical.” Pragmatics & Cognition 18: 397–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “She’s (Not) a Fine Friend: “Saying” and Criticism in Irony.” Intercultural Pragmatics 8: 41–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “A (Neo)Gricean Account of Irony: An Answer to Relevance Theory.” International Review of Pragmatics 7: 40–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garmendia, Joana, and Kepa Korta. 2007. “The Point of Irony.” In Language, Representation and Reasoning, ed. by Mixel Aurnague, Kepa Korta, and Jesus M. Larrazabal, 189–200. Bilbao: upv-ehu.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond. 1994. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1989a [1975]. “Logic and Conversation.” In Studies in the Way of Words, Herbert Paul Grice, 22–40. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 1989b [1978]. “Further Notes on Logic and Conversation.” Studies in the Way of Words, Herbert Paul Grice, 41–57. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Grice, H.P. 1989d [1968]. “Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions”. In Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press., 86–116.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1989c. “Retrospective Epilogue.” In Studies in the Way of Words, Herbert Paul Grice, 339–386. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Transl. by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2015. Im/Politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haverkate, Henk. 1990. “A Speech Act Analysis of Irony.” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 77–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jary, Mark. 2010. Assertion. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Livnat, Zohar. 2004. “On Verbal Irony, Meta-Linguistic Knowledge and Echoic Interpretation.” Pragmatics & Cognition 12: 57–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Quantity, Truthfulness and Ironic Effect.” Language Sciences 33(2): 305–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahon, James. 2015. “The Definition of Lying and Deception.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta, URL = <[URL]> Google Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg. 2005. “Lying and Falsely Implicating.” Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1373–1399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Boston/Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Annabelle. 2004. “Co-operation, Violation and Making Sense.” Journal of Pragmatics 36: 899–920. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nemesi, Attila. 2010. “Data-Gathering Methods in Research on Hyperbole Production and Interpretation.” In The Role of Data at the Semantic-Pragmatic Interface, ed. by Eniko T. Nemeth and Karoly Bibok, 381–417. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal. 2004. “Hyperbole, Extreme Case Formulations.” Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1727–1739. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ozar, Anne. 2008. The Moral Significance of Sincerity. PhD Thesis. Fordham University.Google Scholar
Pagin, Peter. 2015. “Assertion.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <[URL]> Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles. 1934. “Belief and Judgment.” In Collected Papers, vol. 5, ed. by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, 376–387. Cambridge: Harvard.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1986. “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies 9: 219–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reimer, Marga. 2013. “Grice on Irony and Metaphor: Discredited by the Experimental Evidence?” International Review of Pragmatics 5: 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saul, Jennifer. 2012. Lying, Misleading, and the Role of What Is Said. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, John. 1657. Mysterie of Rhetorique Unvail'd. Facsimile reprint of 1st ed., London: George Everfden.Google Scholar
Soames, Scott. 2008. “Drawing the line between meaning and implicature—and relating both to assertion.” Noûs 42: 440–4655. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokke, Andreas. 2013. “Lying and Asserting.” Journal of Philosophy 110: 33–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vincent Marrelli, Jocelyne. 2003. “Truthfulness.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen, 1–48. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Words in the Way of Truth. Truthfulness, Deception, Lying across Cultures and Disciplines. Napoli: Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 1995. “Is There a Maxim of Truthfulness?” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 197–212.Google Scholar
. 2006. “The Pragmatics of Verbal Irony: Echo or Pretence?” Lingua 116: 1722–1743. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2000 [2002, 2012]. “Truthfulness and Relevance.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics: 215–254. [Reprinted as Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2002. “Truthfulness and Relevance.” Mind 111: 583–632; “Truthfulness and Relevance.” In D. Wilson, and D. Sperber. Meaning and Relevance, 47–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Google Scholar
. 2012. “Explaining Irony.” In Meaning and Relevance, Deirdre Wilson, and Dan Sperber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 123–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

HIRATA, ICHIRO
2021. IMPLICATURES OF VOCATIVES AND THEIR THEORETICAL IMPLICATIONS. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 37:2 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2016. Comparing and combining covert and overt untruthfulness. Pragmatics & Cognition 23:1 ► pp. 174 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2016. On untruthfulness, its adversaries and strange bedfellows. Pragmatics & Cognition 23:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2020. To Say the Least: Where Deceptively Withholding Information Ends and Lying Begins. Topics in Cognitive Science 12:2 ► pp. 555 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Figuring out Figuration [Figurative Thought and Language, 14], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.