This chapter discusses the nature of implicit knowledge encoded in situation-bound utterances (SBUs) that are defined as highly conventionalized, prefabricated pragmatic units whose occurrences are tied to standardized communicative situations because they serve as interactional patterns and rituals that usually mean the same to all speakers of a particular speech community. It will be argued that there is a strong connection between implicitness and conventions of usage in language use. Conventional routine expressions like SBUs encode information that is equally available for all members of the given speech community. This information is usually implicit because the functional meaning of expressions is rarely reflected in their compositional meaning. The paradox of the use of SBUs is that although most of them are characterized by a high level of implicitness, they may still represent the most direct way to express some social function.
1996Conversational Routines in English: Convention and Creativity. London: Longman.
1998 “On the Phraseology of Spoken English: The Evidence of Recurrent Word-Combinations.” In Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications, ed. by Paul Cowie Anthony, 101–122. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2016 “Revisiting the Typology of Pragmatic Interpretations.” Intercultural Pragmatics 13: 1–35.
2002Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
1981Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communicative Situations and Prepatterned Speech. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
Eemeren, van Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
1984Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Fillmore, Charles J.
1976 “The Need for a Frame Semantics within Linguistics.” Statistical Methods in Linguistics 12: 5–29.
1884/1980The Foundations of Arithmetic. Trans. by John L. Austin (2nd ed.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Gairns, Ruth, and Stuart Redman
1986Working with Words: A Guide to Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1997 “Understanding Figurative and Literal Language: The Graded Salience Hypothesis.” Cognitive Linguistics 8: 183–206.
2003On Our Mind: Salience Context and Figurative Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gumperz, John J.
1982Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2003Situation-Bound Utterances in L1 and L2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2007 “Formulaic Language in English Lingua Franca.” In Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects, ed. by István Kecskés, and Laurence R. Horn, 191–219. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2010 “Situation-bound Utterances as Pragmatic Acts.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2889–2897.
2013Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2000Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm
1976/1679Philosophical Papers and Letters. Trans. and ed. by Leroy E. Loemker. Dordrecht/Boston: D. Reidel.
Levinson, Stephen C.
2003 “Language and Mind: Let’s Get the Issues Straight!” In Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Cognition, ed. by Gentner Dedre, and Susan Goldin-Meadow, 25–46. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2008 “A Difference of Some Consequence between Conventions and Rules.” Topoi 27:87–99.
Morgan, Jerry L.
1978 “Two Types of Convention in Indirect Speech Acts.” In Pragmatics (Syntax and Semantics 9), ed. by Peter Cole, 261–280. New York: Academic Press.
Nattinger, James R., and Jeanette S. DeCarrico
1992Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
1973 “Meaning and Reference.” The Journal of Philosophy 70: 699–711.
1979Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2022. Avoidance of cognitive efforts as a risk factor in interaction. Discourse Studies 24:3 ► pp. 269 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.