Chapter published in:
Implicitness: From lexis to discourse
Edited by Piotr Cap and Marta Dynel
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 276] 2017
► pp. 281304
References

References

Ariel, Mira
2016 “Revisiting the Typology of Pragmatic Interpretations.” Intercultural Pragmatics 13 (1): 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent
2012 “Saying, Meaning, and Implicating.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Keith Allan and Kasia M Jaszczolt, 47–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bertuccelli-Papi, M.
2000Implicitness in Text and Discourse. Pisa: Edizoni ETS.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Claudia
2013 “Implicating.” In The Pragmatics of Speech Actions, ed. by Maria Sbisà and Ken Turner. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana 1987 “Indirectness and Politeness in Requests: Same or Different?Journal of Pragmatics 11: 131–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolden, Galina B., and Jeffrey D. Robinson
2011 “Soliciting Accounts with Why-Interrogatives in Conversation.” Journal of Communication 61 (1): 94–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert
1997 “Dogmas of Understanding.” Discourse Processes 23: 567–598. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca
1999 “Irony in Conversation.” Language in Society 28 (4): 523–553. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Michael Haugh
2014Pragmatics and the English Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci S.
2006 “Offers of Assistance: Constraints on Syntactic Design.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (8): 1257–1280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Wayne
1998Implicature. Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
1984 “Speakers’ Reportings in Invitation Sequences.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by Maxwell J. Atkinson and John Heritage, 102–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Traci Walker
2009 “ Going Too Far: Complaining, Escalating and Dissafiliation.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (12): 2400–2414. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2014 “A Survey of ‘Intercultural pragmatics’ and its Outlook on the Gricean Philosophy of Communication.” International Review of Pragmatics 6: 307–319. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N.J.
2014 “Human Agency and the Infrastructure for Requests.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 35–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Rod
2007 “The Right Connections: Acknowledging Epistemic Progression in Talk.” Language in Society 36: 319–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1964 “Studies of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities.” Social Problems 11 (3): 225–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gauker, Christopher
2001 “Situated Inference Versus Conversational Implicature.” Nous 35 (2):163–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1956 “Embarassment and Social Organisation.” American Journal of Sociology 62: 264–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P.
1957 “Meaning.” Philosophical Review 66: 377–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1969 “Utterer’s Meaning and Intention.” The Philosophical Review 78 (2): 147–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, Volume 3. Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul
1978 “Further Notes on Logic and Conversation”. In Syntax and Semantics Volume 9. Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 113–127. NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1989Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael 2008 “The Place of Intention in the Interactional Achievement of Implicature.” In Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, ed. by Istvan Kecskes and Jacob Mey, 45–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2012 “On Understandings of Intention: A Response to Wedgwood.” Intercultural Pragmatics 9 (2): 161–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a “Speaker Meaning and Accountability in Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 48: 41–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013b “Implicature, Inference and Cancellability.” In Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy, ed. by Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo and Marco Carapezza. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015aIm/politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015b “Impoliteness and Taking Offence in Initial Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 86: 36–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016a “ ‘Just Kidding’: Teasing and Claims to Non-Serious Intent.” Journal of Pragmatics 95: 120–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016b. “Prompting as a Higher-Order Pragmatic Act.” In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use ed. by Keith Allan, Alessandro Capone and Istvan Kecskes 167 190 New York Springer
2017. “Prompting Offers of Assistance in Interaction.” Pragmatics and Society 8(2): 183–207.
Forthcoming. Getting Acquainted in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haugh, Michael, and Donal Carbaugh
2015 “Self-Disclosure in Initial Interactions Amongst Speakers of American and Australian English.” Multilingua 34 (4): 461–493. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
2012 “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence
2004 “Implicature.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence Horn and Gregory Ward, 3–28. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1987 “On Exposed and Embedded Correction in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button and John R E Lee, 81–100. Clevedon: Mutlilingual Matters.Google Scholar
1991 “List Construction as a Task and Resource.” In Interaction Competence, ed. by George Psathas, 63–92. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
1993 “Caveat Speaker: Preliminary Notes on Recipient Topic-Shift Implicature.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26 (1): 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols With an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene Lerner, 13–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan
2013 “Why Do We Say What We Say the Way We Say It.” Journal of Pragmatics 48: 71–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin H, and Paul Drew
2014 “The Putative Preference for Offers over Requests.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 87–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin H, and Paul Drew 2016 “Recruitments: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49(1): 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene
2013 “On the Place of Hesitating in Delicate Formulations: A Turn-Constructional Infrastructure for Collaborative Indiscretion”. In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, 95–134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
2000Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalised Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2013 “Action Formation and Ascription.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Tanya Stivers and Jack Sidnell, 103–130. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lindström, Anna
2005 “Language as Social Action. A Study of How Senior Citizens Request Assistance with Practical Tasks in the Swedish Home Help Service.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation, ed. by Auli Hakulinen and Margaret Selting, 209–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ogiermann, Eva
2015 "Direct off-record requests? – 'Hinting' in family interactions." Journal of Pragmatics 86: 31-35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan, and Alexa Hepburn
2010 “Putting Aspiration into Words: ‘Laugh Particles’, Managing Descriptive Trouble and Modulating Action.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (6): 1543–1555. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raclaw, Joshua
2013Indexing Inferables and Organizational Shifts: ‘No’-Prefaces in English Conversation. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey
2004 “Prompting Action: the Stand-Alone ‘so’ in Ordinary Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (2): 185–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D.
2004 “The Sequential Organisation of ‘Explicit’ Apologies in Naturally Occurring English.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (3): 291–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992Lectures on Conversation. Volume 1. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organisation of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50: 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saul, Jennifer
2002a “Speaker Meaning, What Is Said, and What Is Implicated.” Nous 36 (2): 228–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002b “What Is Said and Psychological Reality: Grice’s Project and Relevance Theorists Criticisms.” Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (3): 347–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel
1968 “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” American Anthropologist 70: 1075–1095. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sendra, Veronica Crespo, Constanjin Kaland, Marc Swerts, and Pilar Prieto
2013 “Perceiving Incredulity: The Role of Intonation and Face Gestures.” Journal of Pragmatics 47: 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, Maria
1993 “Off-Record Indirectness and the Notion of Imposition.” Multilingua 12 (1): 69–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 “Politeness and Off-Record Indirectness.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 126: 163–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson 1995Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Second ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä
2012 “Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (3): 297–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano
2010 “Mobilising Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1): 3–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svennevig, Jan
1999Getting Acquainted in Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
2005a “Beyond the Micro-Level in Politeness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (2): 237–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “The Puzzle of Indirect Speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (11): 2861–2865. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Re-Assessing the Speech Act Schema: Twenty-First Century Reflections.” International Review of Pragmatics 5 (2): 197–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, Matthew
2006 "Are all conversational implicatures cancellable?" Analysis 66 (2): 127-130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Welch, Denis
2005 “The Representative.” NZ Listener 1 October (Issue 3412). Available at http://​www​.listener​.co​.nz​/uncategorized​/the​-representative/.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

No author info given
2020.  In Understanding Conversational Joking [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 310], Crossref logo
Haugh, Michael & Valeria Sinkeviciute
2018. Accusations and interpersonal conflict in televised multi-party interactions amongst speakers of (Argentinian and Peninsular) Spanish. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6:2  pp. 248 ff. Crossref logo
Parvaresh, Vahid & Sayyed Amir Sheikhan
2019. Pragmatic functions of ‘sort of’ in Persian. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 29:1  pp. 86 ff. Crossref logo
Parvaresh, Vahid & Tahmineh Tayebi
2021.  Taking offence at the (un)said: Towards a more radical contextualist approach. Journal of Politeness Research 17:1  pp. 111 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.