Chapter published in:Implicitness: From lexis to discourse
Edited by Piotr Cap and Marta Dynel
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 276] 2017
► pp. 281–304
Implicature and the inferential substrate
What is said is always silhouetted by the penumbra of the unsaid (Welch 2005)Implicatures are generally conceptualised as additional thoughts, beliefs, intentions and desires that are intended by the speaker to be recognised by the hearer as intended by the speaker. However, implicatures are not simply cognitive constructs, but in being accomplished by persons in interaction, are arguably social actions in their own right. In this chapter, it is proposed that a proper account of implicature needs to be developed with respect to the broader inferential substrate from which implicatures arise. It is suggested that while the inferables that make up this inferential substrate generally remain embedded, that is, where talk progresses without participants orienting to the action that is accomplished through the inferable as an object of interactional business, they may, on occasion, be exposed by those participants as the focus of interactional business in that sequence. It is then proposed that a range of practices license participants to expose an inferable (or set of inferables), including instances of “prompting”, where a speaker positions another participant to make a pre-emptive offer through reporting (possible) troubles, difficulties or needs. It is concluded that given through implicating participants can implicitly orient to both moral and relational concerns, our understanding of implicatures should not be divorced from the inferential substrate of interaction in which they are invariably locally situated.
Keywords: implicature, inference, intention, social action, interactional, pragmatics
Published online: 30 June 2017
Bolden, Galina B., and Jeffrey D. Robinson
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Michael Haugh
Curl, Traci S.
Drew, Paul, and Traci Walker
2016b. “Prompting as a Higher-Order Pragmatic Act.” In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use ed. by Keith Allan, Alessandro Capone and Istvan Kecskes 167 190 New York Springer
2017. “Prompting Offers of Assistance in Interaction.” Pragmatics and Society 8(2): 183–207.
Forthcoming. Getting Acquainted in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haugh, Michael, and Donal Carbaugh
Kendrick, Kobin H, and Paul Drew
Levinson, Stephen C.
Potter, Jonathan, and Alexa Hepburn
Robinson, Jeffrey D.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
Sendra, Veronica Crespo, Constanjin Kaland, Marc Swerts, and Pilar Prieto
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano
2005 “The Representative.” NZ Listener 1 October (Issue 3412). Available at http://www.listener.co.nz/uncategorized/the-representative/.
Cited by 4 other publications
No author info given
Haugh, Michael & Valeria Sinkeviciute
Parvaresh, Vahid & Sayyed Amir Sheikhan
Parvaresh, Vahid & Tahmineh Tayebi
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.