Chapter published in:
Cultural Keywords in Discourse
Edited by Carsten Levisen and Sophia Waters
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 277] 2017
► pp. 25–54

Chapter 2
Nice as a cultural keyword

The semantics behind Australian discourses of sociality

| University of New England
This chapter investigates the English word nice as a cultural keyword, around which sociality discourses revolve. Focusing on its semantic scope in Australian discourse, the keyword nice has an important story to tell about socially accepted and approved ways of thinking, communicating and behaving. Oftentimes nice has been trivialised, or even ridiculed as an “empty word”, but closer scrutiny reveals that nice has all the characteristics of a cultural keyword. It is frequent and foundational in Australian discourse, and it reflects cultural logics, values and orientations. Also, as is common with cultural keywords, nice lacks translational equivalents, even in closely related languages. A comparison with French gentil demonstrates how nice is distinctive in the way it organises and maintains specific discursive orders.
Keywords: nice , Australian English, French, sociality, cultural discourse
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Meet nice
  • 3.Comparisons with French (gentil, sympathique)
  • 4.The collocational profile of nice
    • 4.1The lexical semantics of nice
      • 4.1.1It’s nice to VP
      • 4.1.2Nice person
      • 4.1.3Nice + N place and It’s a nice place to VP
      • 4.1.4 Nice + N thing : Aesthetic and functional
      • 4.1.5Be nice to someone
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 October 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.277.02wat
References

References

Allan, Keith
2007 The Western Classical Tradition in Linguistics. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Austen, Jane
1903 Northanger Abbey. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
Béal, Christine
1990 “ ‘It’s All in the Asking’: A Perspective on Problems of Cross-Cultural Communication between Native Speakers of French and Native Speakers of Australian English in the Workplace.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics Series S (7): 16–32.Google Scholar
1992 “Did You Have a Good Weekend? Or Why There is No Such Thing as a Simple Question in Cross-Cultural Encounters.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 15 (1): 23–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
The Collins Robert French Dictionary
2001 5th ed. Edited by Dominique Le Fur, Brigitte Vienne, Janet Gough and Sabine Citron. Glasgow: HarperCollins 2001.Google Scholar
Entre les murs
2008 [The Class], directed by Laurent Cantet (2008 Haut et Court).Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
2006 “ ‘Lift Your Game Martina!’: – Deadpan Jocular Irony and the Ethnopragmatics of Australian English.” In Ethnopragmatics: Understanding Discourse in Cultural Context, ed. by Cliff Goddard, 65–98. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012a “Cultural Scripts and Communication Style Differences in Three Anglo Englishes.” In Intercultural Miscommunication: Past and Present, ed. by Barbara Kyrk-Kastovsky, 101–120. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2012b “ ‘Early interactions’ in Australian English, American English, and English English: Cultural Differences and Cultural Scripts.” Journal of Pragmatics (Special Issue on (Im)politeness in English) 44 (9):1038–1050.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff, and Anna Wierzbicka
eds. 2008 “New Semantic Primes and New Syntactic Frames: “Specification BE” and “Abstract THIS/IT”.” In Cross-Linguistic Semantics, ed. by Cliff Goddard, 35–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Peter
1996 Practical Reading and Writing Skills. Sydney: Phoenix Education.Google Scholar
Huebler, Axel
1983 Understatements and Hedges in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
1994 Les interactions verbales [Verbal interactions]. Vol. III. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
2005 “The Politics of Nice.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (2): 173–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macquarie Dictionary
. 5th ed. Sydney: Macquarie Dictionary 2009.Google Scholar
Mikes, George
1946 How to be an Alien: A Handbook for Beginners and More Advanced Pupils. London: Allan Wingate.Google Scholar
Mullan, Kerry
2010 Expressing Opinions in French and Australian English Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peeters, Bert
2000 ““S’Engager” vs. “to Show Restraint”, Linguistic and Cultural Relativity in Discourse Management.” In Evidence for Linguistic Relativity, ed. by Susanne Niemeier and René Driven, 193–222. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Treborlang, Robert
1986 How to Survive Australia. Sydney: Major Mitchel Press.Google Scholar
2005 How to be Nice in Australia. Potts Point, NSW: Major Mitchell Press.Google Scholar
Waters, Sophia
2012 “ “It’s Rude to VP”: The Cultural Semantics of Rudeness .” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (9): 1051–1062. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “The Cultural Semantics of “Sociality” Terms in Australian English, with Contrastive reference to French.” PhD diss., University of New England, Armidale.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1985 Lexicography and Conceptual Analysis. Karoma: Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
1999 Emotions across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003[1991] Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. 2nd ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 English: Meaning and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Walter
1956 A First English Companion. Welwyn, UK: Nisbet.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Farese, Gian Marco
2020.  In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication, ► pp. 59 ff. Crossref logo
Levisen, Carsten
2021.  Pæn, flot, dejlig, and lækker . International Journal of Language and Culture 8:1 ► pp. 14 ff. Crossref logo
Peeters, Bert
2020.  In Meaning, Life and Culture: In conversation with Anna Wierzbicka, ► pp. 61 ff. Crossref logo
Trnavac, Radoslava & Maite Taboada
2020.  In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication, ► pp. 185 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.