Cover not available
Part of
Legal Pragmatics
Edited by Dennis Kurzon and Barbara Kryk-Kastovsky
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 288] 2018
► pp. 21–40

Chapter 1
Pleading for life

Narrative patterns within legal petitions (Salem, 1692)

| Humboldt State University (Arcata, California, USA)
While the past decade has seen much scholarship on the legal language of the Salem witchcraft trials in 1692, few studies have been completed on the narrative features of petitions. This study focuses not solely on the formulaic or structural aspects of petitions but introduces and explores various social narratives within them. These social narratives emphasize the petitioner’s family life, religious beliefs and activities, and status in the community. The data consist of 21 petitions presented in 1692 during the height of the crisis (March to December), including both petitions written by individuals accused of witchcraft and those written by other individuals. The three main components – religious, familial, community – of social narratives are analyzed. The study concludes that the intersection between formulaic petitionary language and social narratives that evoke both family and religion dominate in the petitions of 1692. Petitions are used to reframe the accused as participants in a larger social narrative rather than as witches or wizards.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. The data
  • 3.Language and the legal context
  • 4.Features of social narratives
    • 4.1Voices of belief
    • 4.2Community voices
    • 4.3Family voices
  • 5.Petitionary letters in twenty-first century America
  • 6.Concluding comments
    • Key to orthography of seventeenth-century English
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 April 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.288.01dot
References (25)
References
Albanese, Catherine L. 1981. America: Religions and Religion. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Bamberg, Michael and Alexandra Georgakopoulou. 2008. “Small Stories as a New Perspective in Narrative and Identity Analysis.” Text and Talk, 28–3 (377–396). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bellah, Robert N. 1975. The Broken Covenant: American Civil Religion in Time of Trial. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Briggs, Robin. 1996. Witches and Neighbors: The Social and Cultural Context of European Witchcraft. New York: The Penguin Group.Google Scholar
Clark, Stuart. 1997. Thinking with Demons: The Idea of Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
, ed. 2001. Languages of Witchcraft: Narrative, Ideology and Meaning in Early Modern Culture. London: Macmillan Press Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Connor, David P. 2016. “How to Get out of Prison: Views from Parole Board Members.” Corrections Policy, Practice and Research (March).Google Scholar
Demos, John. 2008. The Enemy Within: 2000 Years of Witch-hunting in the Western World. New York, NY: The Penguin Group.Google Scholar
den Boer, Monica. 1993. “Do Trials have Real Winners? On the Harmonisation of Interpretations and the Constructions of Pseudo-Consensus in Legal Discourse.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, VI, 18:293–304.Google Scholar
Dodd, Gwilym. 2007. Justice and Grace: Private Petitioning and the English Parliament in the Late Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doty, Kathleen L. 2007. “Telling Tales: The Role of Scribes in Constructing the Discourse of the Salem Witchcraft Trials.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8: 25–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doty, Kathleen L. and Hiltunen, Risto. 2009. “Formulaic Discourse and Speech Acts in the Witchcraft Trial Records of Salem, 1692,” Journal of Pragmatics 41, 458–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doty, Kathleen and Risto Hiltunen. 2002. ‘I will tell, I will tell’: Confessional Patterns in the Salem Witchcraft Trials, 1692. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 3 (2), 299–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grund, Peter. 2007. “From Tongue to Text: The Transmission of the Salem Witchcraft Records.” American Speech 82: 119–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Risto and Matti Peikola. 2007. “Trial Discourse and Manuscript Context: Scribal Profiles in the Salem Witchcraft Records.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8: 43–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas. 2001. “On Defining Text Types within Historical Linguistics: The Case of Petitions/Statutes.” European Journal of English Studies, 5(2): 197–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William and Joshua Waletsky. 1967. “Narrative Analysis”. In: Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, J. Helms, ed. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 12–44.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1997. “Some Further Steps in Narrative Analysis.” Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4): 395–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mead, Sidney E. 1975. The Nation with the Soul of a Church. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Norton, Mary Beth. 2002. In the Devil’s Snare: The Salem Witchcraft Crisis of 1692. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Peikola, Matti. 2012. “Supplicatory Voices: Genre Properties of the 1692 Petitions in the Salem Witch-Trials.” Studia Neophilologica, Vol. 84 (Supplement 1): 106–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Bernard et al., Eds. 2009. Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

[no author supplied]
2021. The Sociopragmatics of Stance [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 329], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.