Chapter published in:
Legal Pragmatics
Edited by Dennis Kurzon and Barbara Kryk-Kastovsky
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 288] 2018
► pp. 2140


Albanese, Catherine L.
1981America: Religions and Religion. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Archer, Dawn
2002 “ ‘Can Innocent People be Guilty?’ A Sociopragmatic Analysis of Examination Transcripts from the Salem Witchcraft Trials”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 3: 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, Michael and Alexandra Georgakopoulou
2008 “Small Stories as a New Perspective in Narrative and Identity Analysis.” Text and Talk, 28–3 (377–396). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bellah, Robert N.
1975The Broken Covenant: American Civil Religion in Time of Trial. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K.
1993Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Briggs, Robin
1996Witches and Neighbors: The Social and Cultural Context of European Witchcraft. New York: The Penguin Group.Google Scholar
Clark, Stuart
1997Thinking with Demons: The Idea of Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
ed. 2001Languages of Witchcraft: Narrative, Ideology and Meaning in Early Modern Culture. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Connor, David P.
2016 “How to Get out of Prison: Views from Parole Board Members.” Corrections Policy, Practice and Research (March).Google Scholar
Demos, John
2008The Enemy Within: 2000 Years of Witch-hunting in the Western World. New York, NY: The Penguin Group.Google Scholar
den Boer, Monica
1993 “Do Trials have Real Winners? On the Harmonisation of Interpretations and the Constructions of Pseudo-Consensus in Legal Discourse.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, VI, 18:293–304.Google Scholar
Dodd, Gwilym
2007Justice and Grace: Private Petitioning and the English Parliament in the Late Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doty, Kathleen L.
2007 “Telling Tales: The Role of Scribes in Constructing the Discourse of the Salem Witchcraft Trials.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8: 25–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doty, Kathleen L. and Hiltunen, Risto
2009 “Formulaic Discourse and Speech Acts in the Witchcraft Trial Records of Salem, 1692,” Journal of Pragmatics 41, 458–469. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doty, Kathleen and Risto Hiltunen
2002‘I will tell, I will tell’: Confessional Patterns in the Salem Witchcraft Trials, 1692. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 3 (2), 299–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grund, Peter
2007 “From Tongue to Text: The Transmission of the Salem Witchcraft Records.” American Speech 82: 119–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Held, Gudrun
2010 “’Supplica la mia parvidade’: Petitions in Medieval Society – A Matter of Ritualized or First Reflexive Politeness?Journal of Historical Pragmatics 11: 194–218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Risto and Matti Peikola
2007 “Trial Discourse and Manuscript Context: Scribal Profiles in the Salem Witchcraft Records.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8: 43–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas
2001 “On Defining Text Types within Historical Linguistics: The Case of Petitions/Statutes.” European Journal of English Studies, 5(2): 197–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William and Joshua Waletsky
1967 “Narrative Analysis”. In: Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, J. Helms, ed. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 12–44.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1997 “Some Further Steps in Narrative Analysis.” Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4): 395–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mead, Sidney E.
1975The Nation with the Soul of a Church. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Norton, Mary Beth
2002In the Devil’s Snare: The Salem Witchcraft Crisis of 1692. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Peikola, Matti
2012 “Supplicatory Voices: Genre Properties of the 1692 Petitions in the Salem Witch-Trials.” Studia Neophilologica, Vol. 84 (Supplement 1): 106–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Bernard
et al Eds. 2009Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar