Cover not available
Part of
Time in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources
Edited by Arnulf Deppermann and Jürgen Streeck
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 293] 2018
► pp. 231–260

Chapter 7
Prefiguring the future

Projections and preparations within theatrical rehearsals

Theater rehearsals have a characteristic temporal organization: They rely on fleeting (talk/embodied conduct) and endurable resources (e.g. manipulation of objects) to accomplish a stage play which has a defined shape. In doing this, participants have to bridge time gaps and they are therefore dependent on practices which are able to prefigure the future in a more sustainable way. Based on video recordings from theater rehearsals I will show the basic operation of these practices: While projections-by-arrangements anticipate the play world verbally, preparations produce material parts of the play world (e.g. attaching props). Finally, I consider more general implications of the differences between “verbalizing” (projections) and “materializing” (preparations) for the temporalities of interactional organization.
Keywords: theater rehearsals, multimodal resources, temporality, projections, preparations
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Temporality and theater (rehearsals)
  • 3.Data and context
  • 4. Case: Play initiation
  • 5.Projections-by-arrangements
  • 6.Preparations
  • 7.Projection-Preparation-Sequences
  • 8.Conclusion: The temporalities of projections-by-arrangements and preparations
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 13 September 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.293.07sch
References (54)
References
Amerine, Ronald, and Jack Bilmes. 1988. “Following Instructions.” Human Studies 11: 327–339.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Paul. 2006. Everyday Arias: An Operatic Ethnography. Lanham, MD: AltaMira.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2002. “Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar.” Interaction and Linguistic Structures (InLiSt) 33: 1–39.Google Scholar
. 2015. “The Temporality of Language in Interaction: Projection and Latency.” In Temporality in Interaction, ed. by Deppermann, Arnulf, and Susanne Günthner, 27–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Balme, Christopher. 2008. The Cambridge Introduction to Theatre Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassetti, Chiara. 2014. “The Knowing Body-in-Action in Performing Arts. Embodiment, Experimental Transformation and Intersubjectivity.” In Artistic Practices: Social Interactions and Cultural Dynamics, ed. by Zembylas, Tasos, 91–111. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Broth, Mathias, and Leelo Keevallik. 2014. “Getting Ready to Move as a Couple: Accomplishing Mobile Formations in a Dance Class.” Space and Culture 17 (2): 107–121.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. (1996): Using language. Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Dausendschön-Gay, Ulrich, and Ulrich Krafft. 2009. “Preparing Next Actions in Routine Activities.” Discourse Processes 46 (2–3): 247–268.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2013. “Multimodal Interaction from a Conversation Analytic Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 46: 1–7.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Susanne Günthner. 2015. “Introduction – Temporality in Interaction.” In Temporality in Interaction, ed. by Deppermann, Arnulf, and Susanne Günthner, 1–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage. 1992. “Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction.” In Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Drew, Paul, and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ekström, Anna, and Oscar Lindwall. 2014. “To Follow the Materials: The Detection, Diagnosis and Correction of Mistakes in Craft Education.” In Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, ed. by Nevile, Maurice, Haddington, Pentti, Heinemann, Trine, and Mirka Rauniomaa, 227–247. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lichte, Erika. 2004. Ästhetik des Performativen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Lanham: Rowman Littlefield.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold, and Lawrence Wieder. 1992. “Two Incommensurable, Asymmetrically Alternate Technologies for Social Analysis.” In Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology, ed. by Watson, Graham, and Robert M. Seiler, 175–206. Newbury Park: SAGE.Google Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1983. “The Interaction Order.” American Sociological Review 48 (1): 1–17.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston, Massachusetts: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2003. “Pointing as Situated Practice.” In Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet, ed. by Kita, Sotaro, 217–241. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haddington, Pennti, Keisanen, Tiina, Mondada, Lonreza, and Maurice Nevile. 2014. “Towards Multiactivity as a Social and Interactional Phenomenon.” In Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. by Haddington, Pennti, Keisanen, Tiina, Mondada, Lonreza, and Maurice Nevile, 3–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Heath, Christian. 1986. Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2015. “Coordinating the Temporalities of Talk and Dance.” In Temporality in Interaction, ed. by Deppermann, Arnulf, and Susanne Günthner, 309–366. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kirsh, David. 2010. “Thinking with the Body.” In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. by Ohlsson, Stellan, and Richard Catrambone, 2864–2869. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Koschman, Timothy, and Alan Zemel. 2014. “Instructed Objects.” In Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, ed. by Nevile, Maurice, Haddington, Pentti, Heinemann, Trine, and Mirka Rauniomaa, 357–377. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Leach, Robert. 2013. Theatre Studies: The Basics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Macbeth, Douglas. 2011. “Understanding Understanding as an Instructional Matter.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 438–451.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McAuley, Gay. 1998. “Towards an Ethnography of Rehearsals.” New Theatre Quarterly 53: 75–85.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehlin, Urs H. 1969. Die Fachsprache des Theaters: eine Untersuchung der Terminologie von Bühnentechnik, Schauspielkunst und Theaterorganisation. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2006. “Participants’ Online Analysis and Multimodal Practices: Projecting the End of the Turn and the Closing of the Sequence.” Discourse Studies 8 (2): 117–129.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Multimodal resources for turn-taking: pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. In: Discourse Studies, 9, 2, S. 194–225.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Using Video for a Sequential and Multimodal Analysis of Social Interaction: Videotaping Institutional Telephone Calls”. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9 (3): Artikel39. Accessed September 28, 2016. ([URL]).
. 2014a. “Conventions for Multimodal Transcription.” Accessed May 10, 2016. ([URL]; Access-date: 10/05/2016).
. 2014b. “Cooking Instructions and the Shaping of Cooking in the Kitchen.” In Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, ed. by Nevile, Maurice, Haddington, Pentti, Heinemann, Trine, and Mirka Rauniomaa, 199–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2014c. “Bodies in Action: Multimodal Analysis of Walking and Talking”. Language and Dialogue 4: 357–403.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevile, Maurice, Haddington, Pentti, Heinemann, Trine, and Mirka Rauniomaa. 2014. “On the Interactional Ecology of Objects.” In Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, ed. by Nevile, Maurice, Haddington, Pentti, Heinemann, Trine, and Mirka Rauniomaa, 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Prefered/Disprefered Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversational Analysis, ed. by Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, Robert Keith. 2003. Improvised Dialogues: Emergence and Creativity in Conversation. Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard (2006): Performance studies. New York [u.a.]: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1984. “On Some ‘Gestures’ in Relation to Talk.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversational Analysis, ed. by Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and John Heritage, 266–296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1998. “Body Torque.” Social Research 65 (3): 535–596.Google Scholar
2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Sacks, Harvey, and Gail Jefferson. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–382.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Axel. 2014. Spiel oder nicht Spiel? Zur interaktiven Organisation von Übergängen zwischen Spielwelt und Realwelt in Theaterproben. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret et al. 2011. “A System for Transcribing Talk-in-Interaction: GAT 2. Translated and adapted for English by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten.” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 12: 1–51. Accessed September 28, 2016. ([URL])
Streeck, Jürgen. 1995. “On Projection.” In Social Intelligence and Interaction: Expressions and Implications of the Social Bias in Human Intelligence, ed. by Goody, Esther N., 87–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. “How to Do Things with Things: Objects Trouvés and Symbolization.” Human Studies 19 (4): 365–384.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, Goodwin, Charles, and Curtis D. LeBaron. 2011. “Embodied Interaction in the Material World: An Introduction.” In Embodied Interaction – Language and Body in the Material World, ed. by Streeck, Jürgen, Goodwin, Charles, and Curtis D. LeBaron, 1–26. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, and Scott J. Jordan. 2009. “Projection and Anticipation: The Forward-Looking Nature of Embodied Interaction.” Discourse Processes 46 (2–3): 93–102.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weeks, Peter A. D. 1985. “Error-Correction Techniques and Sequences in Instructional Settings: Toward a Comparative Framework.” Human Studies 8: 195–233.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996. “A Rehearsal of a Beethoven Passage.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 29 (3): 247–90.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (16)

Cited by 16 other publications

Riom, Loïc & Mylène Tanferri
2024. Sur la piste des préparations. Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances 18:2 DOI logo
Riom, Loïc, Mylène Tanferri & Birgit Althaler
2024. Den Vorbereitungen auf der Spur. Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances 18:2 DOI logo
Riom, Loïc, Mylène Tanferri, Laura María Miñano Gili & Mylène Tanferri
2024. Tras la pista de la preparación. Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances 18:2 DOI logo
Riom, Loïc, Mylène Tanferri, Loïc Riom & Mylène Tanferri
2024. On the Trail of Preparations. Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances 18:2 DOI logo
Du Bois, Inke
2023. Inside the commentator’s booth: a Multimodal (Inter)action and Conversation Analysis on the production of first division football commentary on TV. Multimodal Communication 12:2 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Krug, Maximilian
2023. Overcoming Blanking: Verbal and Visual Features of Prompting in Theatre Rehearsals. Human Studies 46:2 ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Lefebvre, Augustin & Lorenza Mondada
2023. Interactional Contingencies in Rehearsing a Theater Scene: The Consequentiality of Body Arrangements as Action Unfolds. Human Studies 46:2 ► pp. 303 ff. DOI logo
Löfgren, Agnes
2023. Relocating to Depict: Managing the Interactional Agenda at Opera Rehearsals. Research on Language and Social Interaction 56:3 ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Löfgren, Agnes & Emily Hofstetter
2023. Introversive semiosis in action: depictions in opera rehearsals. Social Semiotics 33:3 ► pp. 601 ff. DOI logo
Norrthon, Stefan
2023. Cueing in Theatre: Timing and Temporal Variance in Rehearsals of Scene Transitions. Human Studies 46:2 ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Schmidt, Axel & Arnulf Deppermann
2023. Showing and telling—How directors combine embodied demonstrations and verbal descriptions to instruct in theater rehearsals. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Schmidt, Axel & Arnulf Deppermann
2023. On the Emergence of Routines: An Interactional Micro-history of Rehearsing a Scene. Human Studies 46:2 ► pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
Schmidt, Axel & Arnulf Deppermann
2023. Editorial: Social Interaction and the Theater Rehearsal. Human Studies 46:2 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Deppermann, Arnulf & Alexandra Gubina
2021. When the Body Belies the Words: Embodied Agency With darf/kann ich? (“May/Can I?”) in German. Frontiers in Communication 6 DOI logo
Nissi, Riikka & Melisa Stevanovic
2021. Interactional means of teaming up: enacting the features of contemporary working life in a theater performance. Multimodal Communication 10:2 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Savijärvi, Marjo & Laura Ihalainen
2021. How an improvised scene emerges in theatre rehearsal. In Intersubjectivity in Action [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 326], ► pp. 373 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.