Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatics and its Interfaces
Edited by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 294] 2018
► pp. 33–57

Discourse pragmatics

Communicative action meets discourse analysis

| University of Augsburg, Germany
The multifaceted and multi-layered phenomenon of discourse has been examined in diverse research paradigms, concentrating on text as the object of investigation, on the connectedness between text and society, and on the representation of discourse. All approaches share the premise that discourse is a parts-whole configuration.
This chapter argues that interlocutors perform communicative action with discourse and in discourse, delimiting discourse from context on the one hand, and from arbitrarily concatenated discursive parts on the other. Their patterned linearisation is constrained by (1) the semantics and pragmatics of the constitutive discourse units, (2) the semantics and pragmatics of the joints, metaphorically speaking, and (3) the semantics and pragmatics of discourse-as-a-whole, demonstrating that the whole is always more than the sum of its constitutive parts. The argumentation is supported by discourse-analytic and pragmatic analyses of British political discourse, demonstrating where the two paradigms meet and where they depart.
Keywords: context, contextualisation, cooperation, discourse, discourse common ground, dovetailedness, indexicality, intentionality, parts-whole, speech act
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Speech acts and higher-level illocutionary act types
    • 2.1Expositive as a higher-level illocutionary act type
    • 2.2Macro speech acts
  • 3.The structuring of discourse
    • 3.1Discourse unit and discursive glue
    • 3.2Discourse unit and sequentiality
  • 4.Doing things with words in discourse
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 7 September 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.294.03fet
References (54)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. “I think – an English Modal Particle.” In Modality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Toril Swan, and Olaf Jansen, 1–47. Berlin: de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asher, Nicolas, and Alex Lascarides. 2003. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1975. How to do Things with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent .1992. “Communicative Intentions, Plan Recognition, and Pragmatics: Comments on Thomason and Littman and Allen.” In Intentions in Communication, ed. by Philip Cohen, Jerry Morgan, and Martha E. Pollack, 389–400. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram, Uta Lenk, and Eija Ventola (eds). 1999. Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness and Time. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Philip, Jerry Morgan, and Martha E. Pollack (eds). 1992. Intentions in Communication. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Beaugrande Robert, and Dressler Wolfgang. 1981. Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul. (2018). “The Interface between Pragmatics and Conversation Analysis”. In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed. by Cornelia Ilie, and Neal R. Norrick. 85–119, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press Press.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2000. “Negotiating Validity Claims in Political Interviews.” Text 20(4): 1–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Recontextualizing Context: Grammaticality meets Appropriateness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Reformulation and Common Grounds.” In Lexical Markers of Common Grounds, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Kerstin Fischer, 157–179. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
. 2011. “’Here is the difference, here is the passion, here is the chance to be part of a great change’: Strategic Context Importation in Political Discourse”. In Context and Contexts: Parts Meet Whole?, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Etsuko Oishi, 115–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Contexts in Interaction: Relating Pragmatic Wastebaskets.” In What is a Context? Linguistic Approaches and Challenges, ed. by Rita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer, and Petra Schumacher, 105–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013a. “The Pragmatics of Discourse.” Topics in Linguistics 11: 5–12.Google Scholar
. 2013b. “Structuring of Discourse.” In Handbooks of Pragmatics. The Pragmatics of Speech Actions. Vol . 2, ed. by Marina Sbisà, and Ken Turner, 685–711. Berlin: de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, Elda Weizman, and Laurence N. Berlin (eds). 2015. The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton-Ann, and Talmy Givón (eds). 1995. Coherence in Spontaneous Text, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1993. English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics. Vol. III, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, Helmut. and Gisela Redeker (eds). 2014. The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J.1992. “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1996. “The Linguistic and Cultural Relativity of Inference.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. by John J. Gumperz, and Stephen C. Levinson, 374–406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael, and Ruqaiya Hasan. 1987. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. (2018). “Pragmatics vs Rhetoric: Political discourse at the Pragmatics-Rhetoric Interface”. In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed. by Cornelia Ilie, and Neal R. Norrick. 85–119, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, and David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse. Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1979. “Activity Types and Language.” Linguistics 17: 365–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. “Interactional Bias in Human Thinking.” In Social Intelligence and Interaction, ed. by Esther Goody, 221–260. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per. 1998. Approaching Dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maier, Robert M., Carolin Hofmockel, and Anita Fetzer. 2016. “The Negotiation of Discourse Relations in Context: Co-Constructing Degrees of Overtness.” Intercultural Pragmatics 13(1): 71–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marmaridou, Sophia. 2000. Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Jim R., and David Rose. 2008. Genre Relations. Mapping Culture. London: Equinox. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob. 2001. Pragmatics. An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2011. “Speech Acts in Context.” In Context and Contexts: Parts meet Whole?, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Etsuko Oishi, 171–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques. 2002. “Speech Act Theory and the Analysis of Conversations.” In Essays in Speech Act Theory, ed. by Daniel Vanderveken, and Susumu Kubo, 239–261. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oishi, Etsuko and Fetzer, Anita. 2016. “Expositives in Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 96: 49–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roulet, Eddy. 2006. “The Description of Text Relation Markers in the Geneva Model of Discourse Organization.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 115– 132. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant. 2000. “Activity Types, Discourse Types and Interactional Hybridity: The Case of Genetic Counseling.” In Discourse and Social Life, ed. by Srikant Sarangi, and Malcolm Coulthard, 1–27. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 2002. “Cognition and Narrativity in Speech Act Sequences.” In Rethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics meets Conversational Interaction, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Christiane Meierkord, 71–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1983. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 2010. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibault, Paul J. 2003. “Contextualization and Social Meaning-Making Practices.” In Language and Interaction. Discussions with John J. Gumperz, ed. by Susan L. Eerdmans et al., 41–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1988. Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trosborg, Anna. 1995. Interlanguage Pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 1980. Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
. 2008. Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, Henry. 2004. Text, Context, and Pretext. Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yule, George. 1996. The Study of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (14)

Cited by 14 other publications

Berthe, Florine, Anita Fetzer & Isabelle Gaudy-Campbell
2024. ‘What we found is’. Functions of Language DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita & Matthias Klumm
2023. The linguistic realization of continuative discourse relations in English discourse. Functions of Language 30:1 ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2021. Chapter 2. Computer-mediated discourse in context. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2022. Doing things with discourse in the mediated political arena. Pragmatics and Society 13:5 ► pp. 769 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita & Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka
2021. Argumentative, Political and Legal Discourse. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 520 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland
2021. Introduction. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Drew, Paul
2018. The interface between pragmatics and conversation analysis. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael & Jonathan Culpeper
2018. Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane
2018. Translation studies and pragmatics. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Ilie, Cornelia
2018. Pragmatics vs rhetoric. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Norrick, Neal R.
2018. Narrative studies versus pragmatics (of narrative). In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Pereira, Gerardine M.
2018. The interface between pragmatics and gesture studies. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Yus, Francisco
2018. The interface between pragmatics and internet-mediated communication. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.