Chapter published in:
Pragmatics and its Interfaces
Edited by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 294] 2018
► pp. 267–290

The interface between pragmatics and internet-mediated communication

Applications, extensions and adjustments

| University of Alicante, Spain
The aim of this chapter is to apply pragmatics to internet-mediated communication. On paper, two broad and apparently incompatible premises constitute the foundation of these distinct applications: (1) internet-mediated communication “makes no difference” for a pragmatic analysis (we do not have specific cognitive mechanisms to interpret online discourses that differ from the ones used offline); and (2) internet “makes all the difference” (the inferential gap-filling made by internet users, intended to turn online texts into valid interpretations, is influenced by the interfaces used for interactions and the range of contextual support that users can access in the interpretation of these online discourses). This chapter will review pragmatic analyses of internet-mediated communication with an emphasis on a cyberpragmatic framework (Yus 2011a).
Keywords: pragmatics, cyberpragmatics, contextual constraint, non-propositional effect, internet-mediated communication
Published online: 07 September 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.294.12yus
References

References

Androutsopoulos, Jannis
2008 “Potentials and Limitations of Discourse-Centred Online Ethnography.” Language at Internet 5.Google Scholar
Bailey, Benjamin
2015 “Interactional Sociolinguistics.” In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Karen Tracy, Cornelia Ilie, and Todd Sandel. Boston: Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belleri, Delia
2014 Semantic Under-Determinacy and Communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Carl S.
2013 “Pragmatics of Chat.” In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. by Carol A. Chapelle. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2014 “Conflict Management in Massive Polylogues: A Case Study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics 73: 19–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Elisabeth
1994 The Formation of Relationships on Internet Relay Chat. Sydney: University of Western Sydney, BA Thesis.Google Scholar
Crowston, Kevin, and Michelle Williams
2000 “Reproduced and Emergent Genres of Communication on the World-Wide Web.” The Information Society 16 (3): 201–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daft, Richard L., and Robert H. Lengel
1984 “Information Richness: A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organizational Design.” Research in Organizational Behavior 6: 191–233.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2014 “Participation Framework Underlying YouTube Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 73: 37–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eisenlauer, Volker
2014 “Facebook as a Third Author -(Semi-)automated Participation Framework in Social Network Sites.” Journal of Pragmatics 72: 73–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria
2004 “Norms and Principles. Putting Social and Cognitive Pragmatics Together.” In Current Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish, ed. by Rosina Márquez-Reiter, and María Elena Placencia, 347–371. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2011 “Pragmatics as a Linguistic Concept.” In Foundations of Pragmatics, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz, and Neal R. Norrick, 23–50. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, and Etsuko Oishi
2011 “Introduction.” In Context and Contexts. Parts Meet Whole?, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Etsuko Oishi, 1–8. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
2013 “Narrative Analysis and Computer-Mediated Communication.” In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. by Susan Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 695–715. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giltrow, Janet, and Dieter Stein
2009 Genres in the Internet. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan
2004 “Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior.” In Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, ed. by Sasha A. Barab, Rob Kling, and James H. Gray, 338–376. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a “Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, Reconfigured, and Emergent.” In Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media, ed. by Deborah Tannen, and Anna Marie Tester, 1–25. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
2013b “Relevance in Computer-Mediated Conversation. In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. by Susan Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 245–268. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen
2013 “Introduction to the Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication.” In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. by Susan Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 3–31. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hine, Christine
2000 Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lomborg, Stine
2014 Social Media, Social Genres. Making Sense of the Ordinary. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Manago, Adriana M.
2015 “Identity Development in the Digital Age: The Case of Social Networking Sites. In The Oxford Handbook of Identity Development, ed. by Kate C. McLean, and Moin Syed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Vincent
2008 “New media, Networking and Phatic Culture.” Convergence 14 (4): 387–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, Wanda J., and Joanne Yates
1994 “Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations.” Administrative Sciences Quarterly 33: 541–574. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998 “Genre Systems: Structuring Interaction through Communicative Norms.” Journal of Business Communication 39 (1): 13–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Yuling
2013 “Interactional Sociolinguistics as a Research Perspective.” In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. by Carol A. Chapelle. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, M., and Carolyn Watters
1998 “The Evolution of Cybergenres.” In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.Crossref
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd edition). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spilioti, Tereza
2015 “Social Media Discourse.” In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Karen Tracy, Cornelia Ilie, and Todd Sandel. Boston: Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sproull, Lee, and Sara Kiesler
1986 “Reducing Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication.” Management Science 32: 1492–1512. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walther, Joseph B.
1996 “Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction.” Communication Research 23 (1): 3–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yule, George
1996 Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2003 “El Chat como Doble Filtro Comunicativo [Chat Room as Double Communicative Filter].” Revista de Investigación Lingüística 2 (5): 141–169.Google Scholar
2005 “Attitudes and Emotions through Written Text: The Case of Textual Deformation in Internet Chat Rooms.” Pragmalingüística 13: 147–174.Google Scholar
2007 Virtualidades Reales. Nuevas Formas de Comunidad en la Era de Internet [Real Virtualities. New Forms of Community at the Internet Age]. Alicante: University of Alicante, Servicio de Publicaciones.Google Scholar
2010 Ciberpragmática 2.0. Nuevos Usos del Lenguaje en Internet [Cyberpragmatics 2.0. New Uses of Language on the Internet]. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
2011a Cyberpragmatics. Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011b “Relevance Equations of Effective Internet Communication.” In: Interdisciplinarity and languages. Current issues in Research, Teaching, Professional Applications and ICT, ed. by Barry Pennock, and Francisca Suau, 65–86. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Identidades Físicas e Identidades en Línea: Atracciones, Desencuentros y Solapamientos [Physical Identities and Online Identities: Attractions, Disconnections and Overlappings].” Paper delivered at Identitats Perverses, Identitats en Conflicte. Lléida (Spain), November.Google Scholar
2013 “Cyberpragmatics.” In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. by Carol A. Chapelle. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014a “Turismo Móvil: Discurso, Interactividad y Usabilidad en las ‘Apps’ de Turismo [Mobile Tourism: Discourse, Interactivity and Usability in the ‘Apps’ for Tourism].” Paper delivered at Discurso y Géneros del Turismo 2.0. Valencia: University of Valencia and IULMA, April.Google Scholar
2014b “La Seducción de lo no Codificado [The Seduction of What is not Coded].” Paper delivered at Intermedialidad en la lengua y la literatura hispánicas. Coloquio Internacional. Université de Lausanne, October.Google Scholar
2014c “Not all Emoticons Are Created Equal.” Linguagem em (Dis)curso (special issue on relevance theory) 14 (3): 511–529. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014d “El Discurso de las Identidades en Línea: El Caso de Facebook [The Discourse of Online Identities: The Case of Facebook].” Discurso & Sociedad 8 (3): 398–426.Google Scholar
2015a “The Role of Cognition and Relevance in New Digital Narratives.” In Prospettive multilingue e interdisciplinari nel discorso specialistico, ed. by Elena Carpi, 81–107. Pisa (Italy): Pisa University Press.Google Scholar
2015b “Should Relevance Theory Analyse What is Non-Propositional, Non-Intentional but yet Affects the Eventual Relevance?” Paper delivered at Relevance Round Table Meeting 4. Institute of English Studies, Jagiellonian University of Kraków, September.Google Scholar
2015c “The Discursive Management of the Phatic Internet (and How to Explain it Pragmatically).” Paper delivered at Approaches to Digital Discourse Analysis (ADDA). Valencia (Spain), November.Google Scholar
2016a “Online Identity: A (Non)propositional Account.” Paper delivered at EPICS VII. Pablo de Olavide University (Seville), May.Google Scholar
2016b Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016c “Towards a Cyberpragmatics of Mobile Instant Messaging.” In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2016: Global Implications for Culture and Society in the Networked Age, ed. by Jesús Romero-Trillo, 7–26. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “Contextual Constraints and Non-propositional Effects in WhatsApp Communication.” Journal of Pragmatics 114: 66–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018. “Identity-Related issues in Meme Communication.” Internet Pragmatics 1 (1).Crossref
forthcoming a. “Relevance from and beyond Propositions. The Case of Online Identity.” In Relevance and Irrelevance: Theories, Factors and Challenges ed. by Jan Strassheim, and Hisashi Nasu Berlin De Gruyter
forthcoming b. “Multimodality in Memes. A Cyberpragmatic Approach.” In Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions ed. by Patricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich Cham (Switzerland) Palgrave Macmillan
Bell, Nancy
2018 “Pragmatics, humor studies, and the study of interaction.” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed.by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick, 291–309. Amsterdam: John Benjamins doi:Crossref.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul
2018 “The Interface between Pragmatics and Conversation Analysis.” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed.by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick, 59–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2018 “Discourse Pragmatics: Communicative Action Meets Discourse Analysis.” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed.by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick, 33–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Culpeper, Jonathan
2018 “Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory.” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed.by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick, 213–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
2018 “Sociolinguistics vs pragmatics: Where does the boundary lie?” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed.by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick, 11–32. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
2018 “Pragmatics vs Rhetoric: Political Discourse at the Pragmatics-Rhetoric Interface.” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed.by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick, 85–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal R.
2018 “Narrative Studies versus Pragmatics (of Narrative).” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed.by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick, 122–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, Gerardine M.
2018 “The interface between pragmatics and gesture studies.” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed.by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick, 163–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2021.  In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], Crossref logo
No author info given
2021.  In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], Crossref logo
Yus, Francisco
2018. Identity-related issues in meme communication. Internet Pragmatics 1:1 ► pp. 113 ff. Crossref logo
Yus, Francisco
2019. An outline of some future research issues for internet pragmatics. Internet Pragmatics 2:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.