Cover not available
Part of
The Construction of Discourse as Verbal Interaction
Edited by María de los Ángeles Gómez González and J. Lachlan Mackenzie
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 296] 2018
► pp. 171–197

“Okay … so … nice to meet you? {smiles}”

Openings in ELF Skype conversations

| Saarland University, Germany | Trier University of Applied Sciences, Germany
| Saarland University, Germany | Trier University of Applied Sciences, Germany
The chapter examines discourse strategies used in conversation openings in CASE, the Corpus of Academic Spoken English (2018), containing English as a Lingua Franca conversations via Skype. Although there are similarities to telephone conversation openings, openings in CASE show differences in content and structure, accommodating the particular setup of Skype conversations and the computer-mediated discourse environment. The different sequences in Skype conversation openings are organized and negotiated cooperatively by participants. They are signalled by significant overuse of the following transition markers (TMs) between sequences: discourse markers, pauses and hesitation markers, laughter, repetitions, and lengthening. The quantitative analysis confirms that TMs occur significantly more often in transition zones between opening sequences than in both non-transition zones and openings as a whole.
Keywords: conversation openings, Skype, conversation organization, conversation sequence transitions, transition markers, English as a Lingua Franca (ELF)
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Research context
    • 2.1New usage patterns in online media: Oral computer-mediated discourse and Skype
    • 2.2Conversational openings: Comparing Skype and telephone conversations
  • 3.Data: CASE – A corpus of ELF Skype conversations
  • 4.Methodology and research hypotheses
  • 5.Qualitative analysis of Skype opening sequences: A comparison with telephone conversations
    • 5.1Contact initiation
    • 5.2Greetings (optional nice-to-meet-you)
    • 5.3Reassurance of understanding
    • 5.4How-are-you
    • 5.5Identification
    • 5.6Technical issues
    • 5.7Double openings
  • 6.Analysis of transition zones in Skype conversation openings
    • 6.1Defining transition zones
    • 6.2Qualitative analysis of transition zones in Skype openings
      • 6.2.1Discourse markers
      • 6.2.2Hesitation markers and pauses
      • 6.2.3Laughter
      • 6.2.4Repetitions and lengthening
      • 6.2.5Interactive establishment of transition zones
    • 6.3Quantitative analysis of transition zones in Skype openings
      • 6.3.1Methodology
      • 6.3.2Results of the quantitative analysis
  • 7.Discussion and conclusion: Opening Skype conversations
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 20 September 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.296.07bru
References (39)
References
Bolden, Galina. 2006. “Little Words That Matter: Discourse Markers ‘So’ and ‘Oh’ and the Doing of Other-Attentiveness in Social Interaction.” Journal of Communication 56: 661–688.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Implementing Incipient Actions: The Discourse Marker ‘So’ in English Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 974–998.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BabyCASE. 2017. Birkenfeld: Trier University of Applied Sciences. [[URL]] (18 March 2018).
Brunner, Marie-Louise. 2015. Negotiating Conversation Starts in the Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Unpublished MA thesis. Universität des Saarlandes.Google Scholar
Brunner, Marie-Louise, and Stefan Diemer. 2016. “‘Mhm, … Okay So U:h, Maybe We Should Start with This Topic’ – Conversation Starts in English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) Skype Talks.” Presentation to IWODA’16 – Fourth International Workshop on Discourse Analysis, Santiago de Compostela, September 2016.Google Scholar
Brunner, Marie-Louise, Stefan Diemer, and Selina Schmidt. 2016. “‘It’s Always Different When You Look Something from the Inside’ – Linguistic Innovation in a Corpus of ELF Skype Conversations.” International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2 (2): 323–350.Google Scholar
. 2018. CASE Transcription Conventions. Birkenfeld: Trier University of Applied Sciences. [[URL]] (15 March 2018).Google Scholar
Campione, Estelle, and Jean Véronis. 2005. “Pauses and Hesitations in French Spontaneous Speech.” DiSS-2005 Aix-en-Provence: 43–46.Google Scholar
CASE. 2018. The CASE Project. Birkenfeld: Trier University of Applied Sciences. [[URL]] (14 March 2018).Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 2007. The Importance of Not Being Earnest: The Feeling behind Laughter and Humor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chan, Anthony, Mark Frydenberg, and Mark J. W. Lee. 2007. “Facilitating Cross-Cultural Learning through Collaborative Skypecasting.” In SIGITE ‘07: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Information Technology Education 2007, ed. by Bob Sweeney, David L. Feinstein, and Joseph J. Ekstrom, 59–66. Destin, Florida: ACM.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Thomas Wasow. 1998. “Repeating Words in Spontaneous Speech.” Cognitive Psychology 37 (3): 201–242.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2001. “Constructing Reason-for-the-Call Turns in Everyday Telephone Conversation.” InLiSt: Interaction and Linguistic Structures 25. [[URL]] (21 March 2017)Google Scholar
Dourish, Paul, Annette Adler, Victoria Bellotti, and Austin Henderson. 1996. “Your Place or Mine? Learning from Long-Term Use of Audio-Visual Communication.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 5: 33–62.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, Willis. 1981. Spoken Discourse: A Model for Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Firth, Alan. 2009. “The Lingua Franca Factor.” Intercultural Pragmatics 6 (2): 147–170.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fish, Robert S., Robert E. Kraut, Robert W. Root, and Ronald E. Rice. 1993. “Video as a Technology for Informal Communication.” Communications of the ACM 36 (1): 48–61.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geluykens, Ronald. 1993. “Topic Introduction in English Conversation.” Transactions of the Philological Society 91 (2): 181–214.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C. 2007. “A Faceted Classification Scheme for Computer-Mediated Discourse.” Language@Internet 4. Article 1. [[URL]] (21 March 2017)Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C., and Jannis Androutsopoulos. 2015. “Computer-Mediated Discourse 2.0.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd ed.), ed. by Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton, and Deborah Schiffrin, 127–151. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
House, Juliane. 2013. “Developing Pragmatic Competence in English as a Lingua Franca: Using Discourse Markers to Express (Inter)Subjectivity and Connectivity.” Journal of Pragmatics 59: 57–67.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huth, Thorsten, and Carmen Taleghani-Nikazm. 2006. “How Can Insights from Conversation Analysis Be Directly Applied to Teaching L2 Pragmatics?” Language Teaching Research 10 (1): 53–79.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, Ellen A., and John C. Tang. 1994. “What Video Can and Cannot Do for Collaboration: A Case Study.” Multimedia Systems 2: 63–73.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Alison, 2002. “‘So …?’: Pragmatic Implications of So-Prefaced Questions in Formal Police Interviews.” In Language in the Legal Process, ed. by Janet Cotterill, 91–110. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Koops, Christian, and Arne Lohmann. 2016. “Discourse Marker Sequencing and Grammaticalization.” In Outside the Clause: Form and Function of Extra-Clausal Constituents [Studies in Language Companion Series 178], ed. by Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer, and Arne Lohmann, 417–446. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Licoppe, Christian, and Julien Morel. 2012. “Video-in-Interaction: ‘Talking Heads’ and the Multimodal Organization of Mobile and Skype Video Calls.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (4): 399–429.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meierkord, Christiane. 2000. “Interpreting Successful Lingua Franca Interaction: An Analysis of Non-Native/Non-Native Small Talk Conversations in English.” Linguistik Online 5 (1). [[URL]] (21 March 2017)Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 2001. “Discourse Markers in Oral Narrative.” Journal of Pragmatics 33 (6): 849–878.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi. 2005. “Analyzing Talk and Text.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.), ed. by Norman K. Denzin, and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 869–886. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1968. “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” American Anthropologist 70: 1075–1095.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1986. “The Routine as Achievement.” Human Studies 9: 111–151.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. “Answering the Phone.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 63–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks. 1973. “Opening Up Closings.” Semiotica 7 (4): 289–327.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Selina. 2013. “A Framework for Laughter in Rapport Management in Skype Conversations of L2 Speakers of English.” Poster presentation, Saarland University Linguistics Poster Day 2013.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2002. “Managing Rapport in Talk: Using Rapport Sensitive Incidents to Explore the Motivational Concerns Underlying the Management of Relations.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (5): 529–545.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, John C., and Ellen Isaacs. 1993. “Why Do Users Like Video? Studies of Multimedia-Supported Collaboration.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 1 (3): 163–196.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsui, Amy B. M. 1991. “Sequencing Rules and Coherence in Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 15 (2): 111–129.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ventola, Eija. 1979. “The Structure of Casual Conversation in English.” Journal of Pragmatics 3: 267–298.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, Steve, and Brid O’Conaill. 1997. “The Role of Vision in Face-to-Face and Mediated Communication.” In Computers, Cognition, and Work: Video-Mediated Communication, ed. by Kathleen E. Finn, Abigail J. Sellen, and Sylvia B. Wilbur, 23–49. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Knight, Dawn, Anne O’Keeffe, Geraldine Mark, Christopher Fitzgerald, Justin McNamara, Svenja Adolphs, Benjamin Cowan, Tania Fahey Palma, Fiona Farr & Sandrine Peraldi
2024. Indicating engagement in online workplace meetings. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics DOI logo
Brunner, Marie-Louise & Stefan Diemer
2021. Multimodal meaning making: The annotation of nonverbal elements in multimodal corpus transcription. Research in Corpus Linguistics 9:1 ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Fernández Polo, Francisco Javier
2021. Backchannels in video-mediated ELF conversations: a case study. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 10:1 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.