Cover not available
Part of
The Construction of Discourse as Verbal Interaction
Edited by María de los Ángeles Gómez González and J. Lachlan Mackenzie
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 296] 2018
► pp. 251–272

Empathy versus engagement

A storyworld possible selves approach to narrative discourse

| Complutense UniversityMadrid, Spain
This study uses one of Hemingway’s very short stories (“The shooting of the six Greek cabinet ministers”, 1924) to explore the connections between narrative engagement, emotion and the linguistic organization of narratives. The analysis is developed within the framework of storyworld possible selves (SPSs) (Martínez 2012, 2014, 2018) or blends of readers’ self-concept and the character construct of a narrative perspectivizer, be it the narrator or a focalizing character. In Hemingway’s story, emotions may seem to emerge from empathy towards the executed ministers; however, a closer look at the language of reference and deixis suggests that engagement and emotion are connected to the ethical conflict resulting from SPS blending and perspectival alignment with their executioners.
Keywords: narrative engagement, storyworld possible selves, empathy, blending theory, double-scope blending, narrative ethics, cognitive stylistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Narrative engagement: Empathy and beyond
  • 3.Storyworld possible selves
    • 3.1Blending theory
    • 3.2SPS blends
    • 3.3Mirror SPS blending
    • 3.4Double-scope SPS blending
  • 4.The linguistic anchoring of storyworld possible selves
  • 5.SPS projection in Hemingway’s “The shooting of the Greek cabinet ministers”
    • 5.1Identifying the character construct in input space 1
      • 5.1.1Pronominal reference and thematization
      • 5.1.2Narrated perception
      • 5.1.3Double-scope SPS blending and emotional response
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
  • Literary works quoted
Published online: 20 September 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.296.10mar
References (62)
References
Baron-Cohen, Simon. 2012. Zero Degrees of Empathy. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bruns, Cristina V. 2016. “Reading Readers: Living and Leaving Fictional Worlds.” Narrative 24 (3): 351–369.Google Scholar
Caracciolo, Marco. 2013. “Patterns of Cognitive Dissonance in Readers’ Engagement with Characters.” Enthymema 8: 21–37.Google Scholar
Djikic, Maja, Keith Oatley, Sara Zoeterman, and Jordan B. Peterson. 2009. “On Being Moved by Art: How Reading Fiction Transforms the Self.” Creativity Research Journal 21 (1): 24–29.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duchan, Judith F., Gail A. Bruder, and Lynne E. Hewitt (eds). 1995. Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Dunkel, Curtis, and Jennifer Kerpelman (eds.) 2006. Possible Selves: Theory, Research and Applications. New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Emmott, Catherine. 1992. “Splitting the Referent: An Introduction to Character Enactors.” In Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice, ed. by Martin Davies, and Louise Ravelli, 221–228. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
. 1997. Narrative Comprehension: A Discourse Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 1996. Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology. London: Routledge.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “The Category of ‘Person’ in Fiction: you and we. Narrative Multiplicity and Indeterminacy of Reference.” In Current Trends in Narratology, ed. by Greta Olson, 101–144. Berlin: de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genette, Gérard. 1980 [1972]. Narrative Discourse. An Essay in Method. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Griswald, John. 2007. “ In Our Time: 1 of 3 Riffs on Hemingway.” In The Education of Oronte Chum, ed. by John Griswald (blogger). McNeese State University. [URL] (Accessed 9 February 2016).Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Herman, David. 2002. Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
. 2008 [2005]. “Storyworld.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory, ed. by David Herman, Manfred Jahn, and Marie-Laure Ryan, 569–570. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Lynne E. 1995. “Anaphor in Subjective Contexts in Narrative Fiction.” In Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective, ed. by Judith F. Duchan, Gail A. Bruder, and Lynne E. Hewitt, 325–340. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura, and Begoña Núñez-Perucha. 2013. “Modality and Personal Pronouns as Indexical Markers of Stance: Intersubjective Positioning and Construction of Public Identity in Media Interviews.” In English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, ed. by. Juana Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús, and Johan van der Auwera, 379–410. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holland, Norman N. 2011 [1975]. The Nature of Narrative Response: Five Readers Reading. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Keen, Suzanne. 2010 [2007]. Empathy and the Novel. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuiken, Don, David S. Miall, and Shelley Sikora. 2004. “Forms of Self-Implication in Literary Reading.” Poetics Today 25 (2): 171–203.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margolin, Uri. 2012. “Character.” In The Cambridge Companion to Narrative, ed. by David Herman, 66–79. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Markus, Hazel R. 1977. “Self-Schemata and Processing Information about the Self.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35 (2): 63–78.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. “Foreword.” In Possible Selves: Theory, Research and Applications, ed. by Curtis Dunkel, and Jennifer Kerpelman, xi–xiv. New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Markus, Hazel R., and Paula Nurius. 1986. “Possible Selves.” American Psychologist 41: 954–969.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martínez, María-Ángeles. 2012. “The Reader-Focalizer Blend: Discourse and Cognition in Narrative Understanding.” Online Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Poetics and Linguistics Association (PALA). [URL] (Accessed 20 November 2016).Google Scholar
. 2014. “Storyworld Possible Selves and the Phenomenon of Narrative Immersion: Testing a New Theoretical Construct.” Narrative 22 (1): 110–131.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Double Deixis, Inclusive Reference, and Narrative Engagement: The Case of you and one.” Babel Afial 24: 145–163.Google Scholar
. 2016. “Staging the Ghost Blend in Two Versions of the Ballad ‘Big Joe and Phantom 309’.” In Audionarratology: Interfaces of Sound and Narrative, ed. by Jarmila Mildorf, and Till Kinzel, 47–63. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2018. Storyworld Possible Selves. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Miall, David. 1990. “Readers' responses to narrative: Evaluating, reading, anticipating.” Poetics 19: 323–339.Google Scholar
Miall, David S., and Don Kuiken. 2002. “A Feeling for Fiction: Becoming what we Behold.” Poetics 30: 221–241.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mildorf, Jarmila. 2013. “Studying Writing in Second Person: A Response to Joshua Parker.” Connotations 23 (1): 63–78.Google Scholar
Oatley, Keith. 2016. “Fiction: Simulation of Social Worlds.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20 (8): 618–628.Google Scholar
Pallarés-García, Elena. 2012. “Narrated Perception Revisited: The Case of Jane Austen’s Emma.” Language & Literature 21 (2): 170–188.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanford, Anthony J., and Simon C. Garrod. 1981. “The Role of Scenario Mapping in Text Comprehension.” Discourse Processes 26 (2&3): 159–190.Google Scholar
Schellekens, Elisabeth, and Peter Goldie. 2011. The Aesthetic Mind: Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seilman, Uffe. 1990. “Readers Entering a Fictional World.” SPIEL 9 (2): 328–342.Google Scholar
Seilman, Uffe, and Steen Larsen. 1989. “Personal Resonance to Literature: A Study of Reminding while Reading.” Poetics 18: 165–177.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Dan. 2005. “What Narratology and Stylistics Can Do for Each Other.” In A Companion to Narrative Theory, ed. by James Phelan, and Peter Rabinovich, 136–149. Oxford: Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidner, Candance. 1983. “Focusing in the Comprehension of Definite Anaphora.” In Computational Models of Discourse, ed. by Michael Brady, and Robert C. Berwick, 267–330. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stangherlin, Nicholas. 2016. “ Nemesis and the Persistence of Tragic Framing: Bucky Cantor as Job, Hebrew Prometheus, and Reverse Oedipus.” Philip Roth Studies 12 (1): 73–87.Google Scholar
Sternberg, Meir. 2003. “Universals of Narrative and their Cognitivist Fortunes (I).” Poetics Today 24 (2): 297–395.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Epilogue. How (not) to Advance toward a Narrative Mind.” In Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps, ed. by Geert Brône, and Jeroen Vandaele, 455–532. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter. 2011. “Authenticity and Creativity in Reading Lamentation.” In Creativity in Language & Literature, ed. by Joan Swann, Rob Pope, and Ronald Carter, 203–216. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Toolan, Michael. 2012. “Language.” In The Cambridge Companion to Narrative, ed. by David Herman, 231–244. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Mark. 2003. “Double-Scope Stories.” In Narrative Theory and the Cognitive Sciences, ed. by David Herman, 117–142. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
. 2007. “The Way We Imagine.” In Imaginative Minds: Concepts, Controversies and Themes, ed. by Hona Roth, 213–225. London: British Academy & Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. The Origin of Ideas: Blending, Creativity and the Human Spark. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wake, Paul. 2016. “Life and Death in the Second Person: Identification, Empathy and Antipathy in the Gamebook.” Narrative 24 (2): 190–210.Google Scholar
Warde, Anthony. 2011. “‘Whatever Form you Spoke of You Were Right’: Multivalence and Ambiguous Address in Cormac McCarthy’s The Road.” Language and Literature 20 (4): 333–346.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Literary works quoted
Amis, Martin. 2011. The Pregnant Widow. London: Vantage Books.Google Scholar
Durrell, Lawrence. 1968 [1957]. Justine. London: faber and faber.Google Scholar
Hemingway, Ernest. 2003 [1924]. In Our Time. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Huxley, Aldous. 1937. Crome Yellow. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lindsay, Jeff. 2004. Darkly Dreaming Dexter. London: Orion.Google Scholar
Norman, Howard. 1999. The Museum Guard. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
O’Faoláin, Sean. “The trout”. [URL]. Retrieved on 20 May 2016.
Poe, Edgar Allan. 1846. “The Cask of Amontillado”. [URL]. Retrieved on 18 March 2013.
Pynchon, Thomas. 2013. Bleeding Edge. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Salinger, Jerome D. (1984) [1951]. The Catcher in the Rye. Harmondsworth and New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. 1996 [1927]. “A Summing Up”. A Haunted House. The Complete Shorter Fiction. London: Vintage. 202–205.Google Scholar