Chapter 13
Scifotainment
Evolving multimodal engagement in online science news
Yiqiong Zhang | Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, People’s Republic of China
This article adopts a multi-analytical perspective to examine engagement in an evolving science communication website. The website has evolved to engage readers from a “verbal nucleus” inherited from traditional news to a “hypermodal nucleus” that caters to the information consumption style of social media, and further to a “scifopost” that integrates social media post into the design. The evolution is driven by the shift from a “deficit model” to a “democracy model” in science communication and a larger cultural shift in the nature of knowledge creation and transmission. Furthermore, the more malleable multimodal resources as compared with verbal resources spearhead the shift from channels for science information to entertainment and engagement, which in turn triggers a similar shift of functions in verbal resources.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Engagement in online science news
- 3.Data: The evolving news page of Futurity
- 4.Theory and methods
- 5.Multimodal engagement in the evolving news pages
- 5.12009 version: Voice of authority as dominant engagement resource
- 5.22010 version: Media affordances as engagement device
- 5.32013 version: Social media practices as engagement scheme
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
References
References
Abdollahzadeh, Esmaeel
2011 “
Poring over the Findings: Interpersonal Authorial Engagement in Applied Linguistics Papers.”
Journal of Pragmatics 43: 288–297.
Allan, Stuart
2009 “
Making Science Newsworthy: Exploring the Conventions of Science Journalism.” In
Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for Public Engagement and Popular Media, ed. by
Richard Holliman,
Elizabeth Whitelegg,
Eileen Scanlon,
Sam Smidt, and
Jeff Thomas, 149–165. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Attar, Arif, and Audley Genus
2014 “
Framing Public Engagement: A Critical Discourse Analysis of GM Nation?”
Technological Forecasting & Social Change 88: 241–250.
Berkenkotter, Carol, and Thomas N. Huckin
1995 Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communities: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brossard, Dominique
2013 “
New Media Landscapes and the Science Information Consumer.”
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (3): 14096–14101.
Brossard, Dominique, and Dietram A. Scheufele
2013 “
Science, New Media and the Public.”
Science 339 (40): 40–41.
Caple, Helen
2009 “
Multi-Semiotic Communication in an Australian Broadsheet: A New News Story Genre.” In
Genre in a Changing World, ed. by
Charles Bazerman,
Adair Bonini, and
Débora Figueiredo, 243–254. Fort Collins: The WAC Clearinghouse.
Caple, Helen, and Monika Bednarek
2010 “
Double-Take: Unpacking the Play in the Image-Nuclear News Story.”
Visual Communication 9 (2): 211–229.
Chen, Yumin
2014 “
Exploring the Attitudinal Variations in the Chinese English Language Press on the 2013 Air Pollution Incident.”
Discourse & Communication 8 (4): 331–349.
de Semir, Vladimir
2010 “
Science Communication and Science Journalism.”
Media for Science Forum.
[URL] (Last accessed November 12, 2011)
Fairclough, Norman
1993 “
Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities.”
Discourse & Society 4 (2): 133–168.
Feng, Dezheng, and Peter Wignell
2011 “
Intertextual Voices and Engagement in TV Advertisements.”
Visual Communication 10 (4): 565–588.
Gauntlett, David
ed. 2000 Web.studies: Rewiring Media Studies for the Digital Age. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
Goldhaber, Michael H.
1997 “
The Attention Economy and the Net.”
First Monday 2 (4).
Griffin, Michael
2004 “
Picturing America’s ‘War on Terrorism’ in Afghanistan and Iraq: Photographic Motifs as News Frames.”
Journalism 5 (4): 381–402.
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd ed. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, Michael A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress
1988 Social Semiotics. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Hyland, Ken
2005 “
Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.”
Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192.
Ingmire, Jann
2014 “
Brain Waves Predict Which Kids Will Share.”
Futurity,
December 19. Accessed February 25, 2015.
[URL].
Jarvie, I. C.
1990 “
Media Representations and Philosophical Representations of Science.”
Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7 (1):72–79.
Jones, Rodney. H.
2005 “
Site of Engagement as Sites of Attention: Time, Space and Culture in Electronic Discourse.” In
Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis, ed. by
Sigrid Norris, and
Rodney H. Jones. London, UK: Routledge.
Julier, Guy
2006 “
From Visual Culture to Design Culture.”
Design Issues 22 (1): 64–76.
Kress, Gunther
2003 Literacy in the New Media Age. London, UK: Routledge.
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
2006 Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd ed. London, UK: Routledge.
Kuester, Dan
2011 “
Super Food: Shoppers Will Pay 25% More.”
Futurity,
September 16. Accessed September 22, 2011.
[URL].
Lane, Patric
2009 “
Jumbo Shellfish Rule in Acidic Oceans.”
Futurity,
December 1. Accessed April 28, 2010.
[URL].
Lemke, Jay L.
2002 “
Travels in Hypermodality.”
Visual Communication 1 (3): 299–325.
Lemke, Jay L.
2005 “
Multimedia Genre and Traversals.”
Folia Linguistica XXXIX (1–2): 45–56.
Lewenstein, Bruce V.
2001 “
Science and the Media.” In
International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, ed. by
Neil J. Smelser, and
Paul B. Baltes, 13654–13657. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Lorenzoni, Irene, Sophie Nicholson-Cole, and Lorraine Whitmarsh
2007 “
Barriers Perceived to Engaging with Climate Change among the UK Public and Their Policy Implications.”
Global Environmental Change 17.
Machin, David, and Lydia Polzer
2015 Visual Journalism. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nelkin, Dorothy
1995 Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Perrault, Sarah Tinker
2013 Communicating Popular Science: From Deficit to Democracy. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ryan, Terry, Richard H. G. Field, and Lorne Olfman
2003 “
The Evolution of US State Government Home Pages from 1997 to 2002.”
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59 (4): 403–430.
Sacharin, K.
2001 Attention! How to Interrupt, Yell, Whisper and Touch Consumers. New York, NY: Wiley.
Sagolla, Dom
2009 140 Characters: A Style Guide for the Short Form. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
Sontag, S.
2001 Where the Stress Falls: Essays. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Stilgoe, Jack, Simon J. Lock, and James Wilsdon
2014 “
Why Should We Promote Public Engagement with Science?”
Public Understanding of Science 23 (4): 4–15.
Tan, Sabine
2010 “
Modeling Engagement in a Web-Based Advertising Campaign.”
Visual Communication 9 (1): 91–115.
Trench, B.
2008 “
Internet: Turning science communication inside-out?”
In Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, ed. By
M. Bucchi &
B. Trench, 185–198. London & New York: Routledge.
van Leeuwen, Theo
1993 “
Genre and Field in Critical Discourse Analysis: A Synopsis.”
Discourse & Society 4 (2): 193–223.
Varner, Johanna
2014 “
Scientific Outreach: Toward Effective Public Engagement with Biological Science.”
BioScience 64 (4): 333–340.
Weinreich, Harald, Hartmut Obendorf, Eelco Herder, and Matthias Mayer
2008 “
Not Quite the Average: An Empirical Study of Web Use.”
ACM Transactions on the Web 2 (1): 1–31.
White, Peter R.
1997 “
Death, Disruption and the Moral Order: The Narrative Impulse in Mass ‘Hard News’ Reporting.” In
Genres and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, ed. by
Frances Christie and
Jim R. Martin, 101–133. London, UK: Cassell.
White, Peter R.
2000 “
Media Objectivity and the Rhetoric of News Story Structure”. In
Discourse and community: Doing functional linguistics, ed. by
Eija Ventola, 379–397. Tübingen: Gunter NarrVerlag.
Zhang, Yiqiong
2012 Representing Science: A Multimodal Study of Science Popularization on Institutional and Mass Media Websites. PhD diss., National University of Singapore.
Zhang, Yiqiong, David Machin, and Tao Song
2015 “
Visual Forms of Address in Social Media Discourse: The Case of a Science Communication Website.”
Journal of Multicultural Discourses 10 (2): 236–252.
Zhang, Yiqiong, and Kay L. O’Halloran
2014 “
From Popularization to Marketization: The Hypermodal Nucleus in Institutional Science News.” In
Critical Multimodal Studies of Popular Discourse, ed. by
Emilia Djonov, and
Sumin Zhao, 160–177. New York, NY: Routledge.
Zhang, Yiqiong
2018 “
Retailing science: genre hybridization in online science news stories.”
Text & Talk 38(2): 243–265.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Pascual, Daniel, Ramón Plo-Alastrué & Isabel Corona
2023.
Digital Scholarly Practices in Scientific Communication: Paths and Goals in Research Dissemination. In
Digital Scientific Communication,
► pp. 3 ff.
Sancho Guinda, Carmen
2023.
¿Idiolectos o tecnolectos? Resquicios de impronta personal en la descripción de procedimientos técnicos.
Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 93
► pp. 17 ff.
Tereszkiewicz, Anna
2023.
Engagement strategies on medical YouTube channels.
Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 140:2
► pp. 139 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.