Cover not available
Part of
Engagement in Professional Genres
Edited by Carmen Sancho Guinda
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 301] 2019
► pp. 243–258

Chapter 13
Scifotainment

Evolving multimodal engagement in online science news

| Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, People’s Republic of China
This article adopts a multi-analytical perspective to examine engagement in an evolving science communication website. The website has evolved to engage readers from a “verbal nucleus” inherited from traditional news to a “hypermodal nucleus” that caters to the information consumption style of social media, and further to a “scifopost” that integrates social media post into the design. The evolution is driven by the shift from a “deficit model” to a “democracy model” in science communication and a larger cultural shift in the nature of knowledge creation and transmission. Furthermore, the more malleable multimodal resources as compared with verbal resources spearhead the shift from channels for science information to entertainment and engagement, which in turn triggers a similar shift of functions in verbal resources.
Keywords: engagement, online science news, social media, deficit model, democracy model, multimodality, design, social semiotics, Systemic Functional Linguistics, genre
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Engagement in online science news
  • 3.Data: The evolving news page of Futurity
  • 4.Theory and methods
  • 5.Multimodal engagement in the evolving news pages
    • 5.12009 version: Voice of authority as dominant engagement resource
    • 5.22010 version: Media affordances as engagement device
    • 5.32013 version: Social media practices as engagement scheme
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 24 April 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.301.13zha
References (51)
References
Abdollahzadeh, Esmaeel. 2011. “Poring over the Findings: Interpersonal Authorial Engagement in Applied Linguistics Papers.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 288–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allan, Stuart. 2009. “Making Science Newsworthy: Exploring the Conventions of Science Journalism.” In Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for Public Engagement and Popular Media, ed. by Richard Holliman, Elizabeth Whitelegg, Eileen Scanlon, Sam Smidt, and Jeff Thomas, 149–165. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Attar, Arif, and Audley Genus. 2014. “Framing Public Engagement: A Critical Discourse Analysis of GM Nation?” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 88: 241–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berkenkotter, Carol, and Thomas N. Huckin. 1995. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communities: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Brossard, Dominique. 2013. “New Media Landscapes and the Science Information Consumer.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (3): 14096–14101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brossard, Dominique, and Dietram A. Scheufele. 2013. “Science, New Media and the Public.” Science 339 (40): 40–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caple, Helen. 2009. “Multi-Semiotic Communication in an Australian Broadsheet: A New News Story Genre.” In Genre in a Changing World, ed. by Charles Bazerman, Adair Bonini, and Débora Figueiredo, 243–254. Fort Collins: The WAC Clearinghouse.Google Scholar
Caple, Helen, and Monika Bednarek. 2010. “Double-Take: Unpacking the Play in the Image-Nuclear News Story.” Visual Communication 9 (2): 211–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Yumin. 2014. “Exploring the Attitudinal Variations in the Chinese English Language Press on the 2013 Air Pollution Incident.” Discourse & Communication 8 (4): 331–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Semir, Vladimir. 2010. “Science Communication and Science Journalism.” Media for Science Forum. [URL] (Last accessed November 12, 2011)
Fairclough, Norman. 1993. “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities.” Discourse & Society 4 (2): 133–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feng, Dezheng, and Peter Wignell. 2011. “Intertextual Voices and Engagement in TV Advertisements.” Visual Communication 10 (4): 565–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gauntlett, David, ed. 2000. Web.studies: Rewiring Media Studies for the Digital Age. London, UK: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Goldhaber, Michael H. 1997. “The Attention Economy and the Net.” First Monday 2 (4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffin, Michael. 2004. “Picturing America’s ‘War on Terrorism’ in Afghanistan and Iraq: Photographic Motifs as News Frames.” Journalism 5 (4): 381–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd ed. London, UK: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London, UK: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress. 1988. Social Semiotics. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2005. “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingmire, Jann. 2014. “Brain Waves Predict Which Kids Will Share.” Futurity, December 19. Accessed February 25, 2015. [URL].
Jarvie, I. C. 1990. “Media Representations and Philosophical Representations of Science.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7 (1):72–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Rodney. H. 2005. “Site of Engagement as Sites of Attention: Time, Space and Culture in Electronic Discourse.” In Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis, ed. by Sigrid Norris, and Rodney H. Jones. London, UK: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Julier, Guy. 2006. “From Visual Culture to Design Culture.” Design Issues 22 (1): 64–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 2003. Literacy in the New Media Age. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd ed. London, UK: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuester, Dan. 2011. “Super Food: Shoppers Will Pay 25% More.” Futurity, September 16. Accessed September 22, 2011. [URL].
Lane, Patric. 2009. “Jumbo Shellfish Rule in Acidic Oceans.” Futurity, December 1. Accessed April 28, 2010. [URL].
Lemke, Jay L. 2002. “Travels in Hypermodality.” Visual Communication 1 (3): 299–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. “Multimedia Genre and Traversals.” Folia Linguistica XXXIX (1–2): 45–56.Google Scholar
Lewenstein, Bruce V. 2001. “Science and the Media.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, ed. by Neil J. Smelser, and Paul B. Baltes, 13654–13657. Oxford, UK: Pergamon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenzoni, Irene, Sophie Nicholson-Cole, and Lorraine Whitmarsh. 2007. “Barriers Perceived to Engaging with Climate Change among the UK Public and Their Policy Implications.” Global Environmental Change 17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Machin, David, and Lydia Polzer. 2015. Visual Journalism. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelkin, Dorothy. 1995. Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Perrault, Sarah Tinker. 2013. Communicating Popular Science: From Deficit to Democracy. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Terry, Richard H. G. Field, and Lorne Olfman. 2003. “The Evolution of US State Government Home Pages from 1997 to 2002.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59 (4): 403–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacharin, K. 2001. Attention! How to Interrupt, Yell, Whisper and Touch Consumers. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sagolla, Dom. 2009. 140 Characters: A Style Guide for the Short Form. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sontag, S. 2001. Where the Stress Falls: Essays. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Stilgoe, Jack, Simon J. Lock, and James Wilsdon. 2014. “Why Should We Promote Public Engagement with Science?” Public Understanding of Science 23 (4): 4–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, Sabine. 2010. “Modeling Engagement in a Web-Based Advertising Campaign.” Visual Communication 9 (1): 91–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trench, B. 2008. “Internet: Turning science communication inside-out?” In Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, ed. By M. Bucchi & B. Trench, 185–198. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 1993. “Genre and Field in Critical Discourse Analysis: A Synopsis.” Discourse & Society 4 (2): 193–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varner, Johanna. 2014. “Scientific Outreach: Toward Effective Public Engagement with Biological Science.” BioScience 64 (4): 333–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Harald, Hartmut Obendorf, Eelco Herder, and Matthias Mayer. 2008. “Not Quite the Average: An Empirical Study of Web Use.” ACM Transactions on the Web 2 (1): 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Peter R. 1997. “Death, Disruption and the Moral Order: The Narrative Impulse in Mass ‘Hard News’ Reporting.” In Genres and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School, ed. by Frances Christie and Jim R. Martin, 101–133. London, UK: Cassell.Google Scholar
2000. “Media Objectivity and the Rhetoric of News Story Structure”. In Discourse and community: Doing functional linguistics, ed. by Eija Ventola, 379–397. Tübingen: Gunter NarrVerlag.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yiqiong. 2012. Representing Science: A Multimodal Study of Science Popularization on Institutional and Mass Media Websites. PhD diss., National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yiqiong, David Machin, and Tao Song. 2015. “Visual Forms of Address in Social Media Discourse: The Case of a Science Communication Website.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses 10 (2): 236–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Yiqiong, and Kay L. O’Halloran. 2014. “From Popularization to Marketization: The Hypermodal Nucleus in Institutional Science News.” In Critical Multimodal Studies of Popular Discourse, ed. by Emilia Djonov, and Sumin Zhao, 160–177. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yiqiong. 2018. “Retailing science: genre hybridization in online science news stories.” Text & Talk 38(2): 243–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Pascual, Daniel, Ramón Plo-Alastrué & Isabel Corona
2023. Digital Scholarly Practices in Scientific Communication: Paths and Goals in Research Dissemination. In Digital Scientific Communication, ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Sancho Guinda, Carmen
2023. ¿Idiolectos o tecnolectos? Resquicios de impronta personal en la descripción de procedimientos técnicos. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 93 ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Tereszkiewicz, Anna
2023. Engagement strategies on medical YouTube channels. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 140:2 ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.