Cover not available
Part of
Engagement in Professional Genres
Edited by Carmen Sancho Guinda
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 301] 2019
► pp. 297–320

Chapter 16
Silence and engagement in the multimodal genre of synchronous videoconferencing lectures

The case of Didactics in Mathematics

| Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR), Spain
| Universidad de Alcalá, Spain
This chapter analyses how teachers, in synchronous videoconferencing lectures of Didactics in Mathematics, manage silence to promote engagement. The epistemology of Mathematics, with its specific semiotic resources, requires special consideration to guarantee an adequate acquisition of contents and teaching procedures. A qualitative approach allows the analysis of multimodal interaction during significant episodes of absence of talk, in a teaching-learning context with different communicative channels, oral for teachers (who are in front of the camera) and written for learners (who use the chat). Results reveal the importance of the multimodal strategies used to repair teachers’ and learners’ silence in two main situations: the IRF (Initiation-Response-Feedback) cycle initiated by teacher’s questions and the teaching exchange when interacting with materials.
Keywords: videoconferencing, engagement, silence, multimodal discourse, Didactics in Mathematics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Communication through the chat in synchronous videoconferencing learning environments
    • 2.2Teaching Didactics in Mathematics through SVLs
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Findings and discussion
    • 4.1Absence of teacher’s talk: Asking questions
    • 4.2Absence of teacher’s talk: Interacting with materials
  • 5.Conclusions
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 24 April 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.301.16que
References (26)
References
Almeida Bairral, Marcelo 2011. “Interagindo, Ouvindo o Silêncio e Refletindo sobre o Papel do Formador em Chat com Professores de Matemática.” Educar em Revista spe (1): 173–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christie, Frances. 2000. “The Language of Classroom Interaction and Learning.” In Researching Language in Schools and Communities: Functional Linguistic Perspectives, ed. by Len Unsworth, 184–203. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 2007. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad, and Jochen Rehbein. 1986. Muster und Institution: Untersuchungen zur schulischen Kommunikation. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Ellis, Rod. 1992. “Learning to Communicate in the Classroom: A Study of Two Learners’ Requests.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14: 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Font, Vicent, Juan Godino, and Jesús Gallardo. 2013. “The Emergence of Objects from Mathematical Practices.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 82 (1): 97–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2000. “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (10): 1489–1522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Christian, Jon Hindmarsh, and Paul Luff. 2010. Video in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Jewitt, Carey, Jeff Bezemer, and Kay O’Halloran. 2016. Introducing Multimodality. London/ New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klein, Mary. 2002. “Teaching Mathematics in/for New Times: A Poststructuralist Analysis of the Productive Quality of the Pedagogic Process.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 50 (1): 63–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kozar, Olga. 2016. “Teachers’ Reaction to Silence and Teachers’ Wait Time in Video and Audioconferencing English Lessons: Do Webcams Make a Difference?” System 62: 53–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llinares, Salvador. 2009. “Competencias Docentes del Maestro en la Docencia de las Matemáticas y el Diseño de Programas de Formación.” Uno. Revista de Didáctica de las Matemáticas 51: 92–101.Google Scholar
Manghi Haquin, Dominique. 2010. “Recursos Semióticos do Professor de Matemática: Funções Complementares da Fala e os Gestos para a Alfabetização Científica Escolar.” Estudios Pedagógicos (Valdivia) 36 (2): 99–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayan, Maria. 2009. Essentials of Qualitative Inquiry. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2011. “The Organization of Concurrent Courses of Action in Surgical Demonstrations.” In Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, ed. by Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron, 207–226. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morse, Janice. 1995. “The Significance of Saturation.” Qual Health Res 5 (2): 147–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moyer, Patricia S. 2001. “Are We Having Fun Yet? How Teachers Use Manipulatives to Teach Mathematics.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 47 (2): 175–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radford, Luis. 2009. “Why Do Gestures Matter? Sensuous Cognition and the Palpability of Mathematical Meanings.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 70 (2): 111–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowe, Mary Budd. 1986. “Wait Time: Slowing Down May Be a Way of Speeding Up!” Journal of Teacher Education 37 (1): 43–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schleppegrell, Mary. 2007. “The Linguistic Challenges of Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A Research Review.” Reading & Writing Quarterly 23 (2): 139–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strijbos, Jan Willem, and Gerry Stahl. 2007. “Methodological Issues in Developing a Multi-Dimensional Coding Procedure for Small Group Chat Communication.” Learning and Instruction 17: 394–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Susan. 1998. “Why Ask Questions in Monologue? Language Choice at Work in Scientific and Linguistic Talk.” In Language at Work, ed. by Susan Hunston, 137–150. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Tobin, Kenneth. 1987. “The Role of Wait Time in Higher Cognitive Level Learning.” Review of Educational Research 57 (1): 69–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uttal, David H., Kathyrn V. Scudder, and Judy S. DeLoache. 1997. “Manipulatives as Symbols: A New Perspective on the Use of Concrete Objects to Teach Mathematics.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 18 (1): 37–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Sande, Carla. 2011. “A Description and Characterization of Student Activity in an Open, Online, Mathematics Help Forum.” Educ Stud Matemáticas 77: 53–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoon, Caroline, Michael Thomas, and Tommy Dreyfus. 2011. “Grounded Blends and Mathematical Gesture Spaces: Developing Mathematical Understandings via Gestures.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 78 (3): 371–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Querol-Julián, Mercedes
2024. CLIL teacher online professional development in translanguaging and trans-semiotizing: a pedagogy of multiliteracies. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Crawford Camiciottoli, Belinda & Inmaculada Fortanet-Gómez
2022. Towards developing multimodal literacies in the ESP classroom: methodological insights and practical applications. Multimodal Communication 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bernad-Mechó, Edgar & Inmaculada Fortanet-Gómez
2019. Chapter 17. Organizational metadiscourse across lecturing styles. In Engagement in Professional Genres [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 301], ► pp. 321 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.