Chapter published in:
Emotion in Discourse
Edited by J. Lachlan Mackenzie and Laura Alba-Juez
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 302] 2019
► pp. 29–54

The multifunctionality of swear/taboo words in television series

| The University of Sydney (Australia) | Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (Germany)
This chapter focuses on swear/taboo words, which can be used for the expression of emotion. It combines a theoretical with an applied lens, in first discussing their place in Systemic Functional Linguistics, before examining their use in contemporary US television series. To do so, the chapter makes use of a new corpus of dialogue transcribed from 66 contemporary TV series: the Sydney Corpus of Television Dialogue (SydTV). SydTV is a small, specialized corpus which has been designed to be representative of the language variety of fictional US American TV dialogue. The analysis of SydTV focuses on the frequency, distribution and functions of swear/taboo words, showing that they are a prime example of the multifunctionality of much television dialogue. As I will illustrate with examples, they can be used for characterization, for humor, as a plot device, as a catch-phrase, to create realism, or to control viewer evaluation/emotion.
Keywords: swear words, taboo words, expletives, appraisal, emotion, affect, TV series, media linguistics
Published online: 27 March 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.302.02bed
References

References

Alba-Juez, Laura & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
This volume. “Emotion Processes in Discourse.”
Allan, Keith & Kate Burridge
2006 Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Swearing.” In Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English, ed. by Pam Peters, Peter Collins & Adam Smith, 361‒386. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alonso, Belmonte Isabel
This volume. “Victims, Heroes and Villains in Newsbites: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Spanish Eviction Crisis in El País .”
Al-Surmi, Mansoor
2012 “Authenticity and TV Shows: A Multidimensional Analysis Perspective.” TESOL Quarterly 46 (4): 671‒694. Crossref.Google Scholar
Anderson, Luvell & Ernie Lepore
2013 “Slurring Words.” Noûs 47 (1): 25‒48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, Lars-Gunnar & Peter Trudgill
1990 Bad Language. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Azzaro, Gabriele
2005 Four-Letter Films: Taboo Language in Movies. Rome: Aracne.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2006 Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2008 Emotion Talk across Corpora. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009a “Language Patterns and Attitude.” Functions of Language 16 (2): 165–192. Crossref.Google Scholar
2009b “Polyphony in Appraisal: Typological and Topological Perspectives.” Linguistics and the Human Sciences 3 (2): 107‒136. Crossref.Google Scholar
2010 The Language of Fictional Television: Drama and Identity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2011 “Expressivity and Televisual Characterisation.” Language and Literature 20 (1): 3‒21. Crossref.Google Scholar
2012 “ ‘Get Us the Hell Out of Here’: Key Words and Trigrams in Fictional Television Series.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17 (1): 35‒63. Crossref.Google Scholar
2015a “Corpus-Assisted Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Television and Film Narratives.” In Corpora and Discourse Studies, ed. by Paul Baker & Tony McEnery, 63–87. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015b “ ‘Wicked’ Women in Contemporary Pop Culture: ‘Bad’ Language and Gender in Weeds, Nurse Jackie and Saving Grace .” Text & Talk 35 (4): 431‒451. Crossref.Google Scholar
2017 “The Role of Dialogue in Fiction.” In Pragmatics of Fiction, ed. by Miriam Locher & Andreas H. Jucker, 129‒158. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 Language and Television Series. A Linguistic Approach to TV Dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Under review. “‘Don’t Say Crap. Don’t Use Swear Words.’ – Negotiating the Use of Swear/Taboo Words in the Narrative Mass Media.”
Beers Fägersten, Kristy
2012 Who’s Swearing Now? The Social Aspects of Conversational Swearing. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Benítez-Castro, Miguel Ángel & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
This volume. “Rethinking Martin & White’s affect Taxonomy: A Psychologically-Inspired Approach to the Linguistic Expression of Emotion.”
Bennett, Tara
2014 Showrunners: The Art of Running a TV Show. London: Titan Books. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
2015 “Slurs and Expletives: A Case against a General Account of Expressive Meaning.” Language Sciences 52: 22–35. Crossref.Google Scholar
Bleichenbacher, Lukas
2008 Multilingualism in the Movies. Hollywood Characters and Their Language Choices. Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Brock, Alexander
2011 “Bumcivilian: Systemic Aspects of Humorous Communication in Comedies.” In Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series, ed. by Roberta Piazza, Monika Bednarek & Fabio Rossi, 263–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2001 Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Dewaele, Jean-Marc
2004 “The Emotional Force of Swearwords and Taboo Words in the Speech of Multilinguals.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 25 (2–3): 204‒222. Crossref.Google Scholar
2015 “British ‘Bollocks’ versus American ‘Jerk’: Do Native British English Speakers Swear More ‒ or Differently ‒ Compared to American English Speakers?” Applied Linguistic Review 6 (3): 309–339. Crossref.Google Scholar
2016 “Thirty Shades of Offensiveness: L1 and LX English Users’ Understanding, Perception and Self-Reported Use of Negative Emotion-Laden Words.” Journal of Pragmatics 94: 112‒127. Crossref.Google Scholar
2017 “Glimpses of Semantic Restructuring of English Emotion-Laden Words of American English L1 Users Residing Outside the USA.” Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism (online first). Crossref.Google Scholar
Douglas, Pamela
2011 Writing the TV Drama Series: How to Succeed as a Professional Writer in TV. 3rd Ed. Studio City, CA: Michael Wiese Productions.Google Scholar
Downing, Angela & Elena Martínez Caro
This volume. “Interjections and Emotions: The Case of gosh.”
Eggins, Suzanne & Diana Slade
1997 Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
2015 “ ‘Swear Words’ and ‘Curse Words’ in Australian (and American) English: At the Crossroads of Pragmatics, Semantics and Sociolinguistics.” Intercultural Pragmatics 12 (2): 189‒218. Crossref.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
2014 Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack & Donna Jo Napoli
2008 “Just for the Hell of It: A Comparison of Two Taboo-Term Constructions.” Journal of Linguistics 44 (2): 347–378. Crossref.Google Scholar
Hood, Susan & James R. Martin
2007 “Invoking Attitude: The Play of Graduation in Appraising Discourse.” In Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective, ed. by Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan Webster, 739‒764. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Jay, Timothy
2000 Why We Curse: A Neuro-Psycho-Social Theory of Speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jay, Timothy & Kristen Janschewitz
2008 “The Pragmatics of Swearing.” Journal of Politeness Research 4 (2): 267‒288. Crossref.Google Scholar
Jay, Kristen & Timothy Jay
2013 “A Child’s Garden of Curses: A Gender, Historical, and Age-Related Evaluation of the Taboo Lexicon.” The American Journal of Psychology 126 (4): 459‒475. Crossref.Google Scholar
Kozloff, Sarah
2000 Overhearing Film Dialogue. Ewing, NJ: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Mark
2007 “Mark Lawson Talks to David Chase.” In Quality TV: Contemporary American Television and Beyond, ed. by Janet McCabe & Kim Akass, 185–221. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Lutzky, Ursula & Andrew Kehoe
2016 “Your Blog is (the) Shit: A Corpus Linguistic Approach to the Identification of Swearing in Computer Mediated Communication.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21 (2): 165–191. Crossref.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
This volume. “The Syntax of an Emotional Expletive in English.”
Mandala, Susan
2010 The Question of Style: Language in Science Fiction and Fantasy. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, James R.
2000 “Beyond Exchange: Appraisal Systems in English.” In Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson, 142‒175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010 “Semantic Variation ‒ Modelling Realization, Instantiation and Individuation in Social Semiosis.” In New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation, ed. by Monika Bednarek & James R. Martin, 1‒34. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White
2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, Janet & Kim Akass
(eds.) 2007 Quality TV: Contemporary American Television and Beyond. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
McEnery, Anthony
2006 Swearing in English: Bad Language, Purity and Power from 1586 to the Present. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
McEnery, Anthony, John Paul Baker & Andrew Hardie
2000 “Assessing Claims about Language Use with Corpus Data – Swearing and Abuse.” In Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English, ed. by John M. Kirk, 44‒55. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
McMillan, James B.
1980 “Infixing and Interposing in English.” American Speech 55 (3): 163‒183. Crossref.Google Scholar
Mittmann, Brigitta
2006 “With a Little Help from Friends (and Others): Lexico-Pragmatic Characteristics of Original and Dubbed Film Dialogue.” In: Anglistentag 2005, Bamberg – Proceedings, ed. by Christoph Houswitschka, Gabriele Knappe & Anja Müller, 573–585. Trier: WVT.Google Scholar
Oatley, Keith
2002 “Emotions and the Story Worlds of Fiction.” In Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations, ed. by Melanie C. Green, Jeffrey J. Strange & Timothy C. Brook, 39‒69. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ofcom (Office of Communications)
2005 “Language and Sexual Imagery in Broadcasting: A Contextual Investigation.” Research study by the Fuse Group for Ofcom. Accessed August 29th, 2017. https://​www​.ofcom​.org​.uk​/_​_data​/assets​/pdf​_file​/0012​/24015​/language​.pdf
2010 “Audience Attitudes towards Offensive Language on Television and Radio.” Research study by Synovate UK for Ofcom. Accessed August 29th, 2017. https://​www​.ofcom​.org​.uk​/_​_data​/assets​/pdf​_file​/0017​/27260​/offensive​-lang​.pdf
Perek, Florent
2016 “Using Distributional Semantics to Study Syntactic Productivity in Diachrony: A Case Study.” Linguistics 54 (1): 149–188. Crossref.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2007 “The Expressive Dimension.” Theoretical Linguistics 33 (2): 165‒198. Crossref.Google Scholar
Price, Jack
2015 ‘Oh Jesus Christ!’ The Use of Bad Language in Contemporary American Television Series. Honours thesis, Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Priggé, Steven
2005 Created by … Inside the Minds of TV’s Top Show Creators. Los Angeles: Silman-James Press.Google Scholar
Quaglio, Paulo
2008 “Television Dialogue and Natural Conversation: Linguistic Similarities and Functional Differences.” In Corpora and Discourse: The Challenges of Different Settings, ed. by Annelie Ädel & Randi Reppen, 189–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009  Television Dialogue: The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Queen, Robin
2015 Vox Popular: The Surprising Life of Language in the Media. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Richardson, Kay
2010 Television Dramatic Dialogue. A Sociolinguistic Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Mike
2017 WordSmith Tools Version 7. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Scott, Mike & Christopher Tribble
2006 Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stapleton, Karyn
2003 “Gender and Swearing: A Community Practice.” Women and Language 26 (2): 22‒33.Google Scholar
2010 “Swearing.” In Interpersonal Pragmatics, ed. by Miriam A. Locher & Sage L. Graham, 289‒306. Vol. 6 of Handbooks of Pragmatics, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz, Andreas H. Jucker & Klaus P. Schneider. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thelwall, Mike
2008 “Fk Yea I Swear: Cursing and Gender in MySpace.” Corpora 3 (1): 83–107. Crossref.Google Scholar
Walshe, Shane
2011 “ ‘Normal People Like Us Don’t Use That Type of Language. Remember This is the Real World’. The Language of Father Ted: Representations of Irish English in a Fictional World.” Sociolinguistic Studies 5 (1): 127–148. Crossref.Google Scholar
Wharton, Tim
2016 “That Bloody So-and-So Has Retired: Expressives Revisited.” Lingua 175–176: 20‒35, Crossref.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Bednarek, Monika
2019.  In Creating Dialogue for TV, ► pp. 44 ff. Crossref logo
Mohammadi, Ariana N.
2020. Swearing in a second language: the role of emotions and perceptions. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Pavesi, Maria & Pablo Zamora
2021. The reception of swearing in film dubbing: a cross-cultural case study. Perspectives ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Werner, Valentin
2021. A diachronic perspective on telecinematic language. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 38 ff. Crossref logo
Xavier, Catarina
2021. On norms and taboo. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.