Part of
The Social Dynamics of Pronominal Systems: A comparative approachEdited by Paul Bouissac
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 304] 2019
► pp. 35–56
Edited by Paul Bouissac
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 304] 2019
► pp. 35–56
Chapter 2When we means you
The social meaning of English pseudo-inclusive personal pronouns
This chapter uses qualitative and quantitative analysis of interactions collected in a New Zealand rugby team to analyse the way in which pronominal choice impacts upon the social dynamics of leadership discourse. In particular, the pseudo-inclusive first person plural pronoun is examined in terms of its solidarity enhancing effect and mitigation of leadership-focused speech acts. Pronominal use is analysed with reference to the sociolinguistic concept of stance alignment and how this can mitigate potential face-threat. The discussion considers that by including themselves with the addressees of an interaction, leaders can attenuate the illocutionary force of speech acts such as directives and criticism, whilst maximising the directness of their expression, and goes on to question the social function of pseudo-inclusive compliments.
Keywords: clusivity, leadership, speech acts, stance, illocutionary force
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature
- 2.1Stance
- 2.2Clusivity, stance and the pronominal system
- 2.3Control acts, compliments and criticism
- 3.Methodology
- 4.Qualitative analysis
- 5.Quantitative analysis
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
-
References
References (50)
Adachi, Chie. 2016. ‘Sugoi!–Indexicality and Stancetaking in Japanese Compliments’. Language in Society 45 (02): 193–216. 
Bass, Bernard M. 1990. Bass and Stodgill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications. 3rd ed. New York; London; Toronto; Sydney; Singapore: The Free Press.
Berry, Roger. 2009. ‘You Could Say That: The Generic Second-Person Pronoun in Modern English’. English Today 25 (03): 29–34.
.
Brown, Penelope., and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics; 4. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman. 1960. ‘The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity’. In Style in Language, ed. by T. A. Sebeok, 253–76. Cambridge, Massachussetts: MIT Press. [URL]
Choi, Seongsook, and Stephanie Schnurr. 2014. ‘Exploring Distributed Leadership: Solving Disagreements and Negotiating Consensus in a “Leaderless” Team’. Discourse Studies 16 (1): 3–24.
Crevani, Lucia, Monica Lindgren, and Johann Packendorff. 2010. ‘Leadership, Not Leaders: On the Study of Leadership as Practices and Interactions’. Scandinavian Journal of Management 26 (1): 77–86.
Cysouw, Michael. 2003. The Paradigmatic Structure of Person Marking. Oxford: OUP.
. 2005. ‘Syncretisms Involving Clusivity’. Typological Studies i n Language 63: 73.
De Cock, Barbara. 2011. ‘Why We Can Be You: The Use of 1st Person Plural Forms with Hearer Reference in English and Spanish’. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (11): 2762–75.
. 2016. ‘Register, Genre and Referential Ambiguity of Personal Pronouns’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 26 (3): 361– 378.
DuBois, John. 2007. ‘The Stance Triangle’. In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–82. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Ervin-Tripp, Susan, Jiansheng Guo, and Martin Lampert. 1990. ‘Politeness and Persuasion in Children’s Control Acts’. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 307–31.
Filimonova, Elena. 2005. Clusivity: Typology and Case Studies of Inclusive-Exclusive Distinction. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins Pub.
Fraser, Bruce. 1980. ‘Conversational Mitigation’. Journal of Pragmatics 4 (4): 341–50.
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.
. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
. 1981. Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Golato, Andrea. 2003. ‘Studying Compliment Responses: A Comparison of DCTs and Recordings of Naturally Occurring Talk’. Applied Linguistics 24 (1): 90–121.
Goodwin, Charles. 2007. ‘Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities’. Discourse & Society 18 (1): 53–73.
Gumperz, John Joseph. 1999. ‘On Interactional Sociolinguistic Method’. In Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discours e in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings, ed. by Srikant Sarangi and Celia Roberts, 454–71. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Haverkate, Henk. 1992. ‘Deictic Categories as Mitigating Devices’. Pragmatics 2 (4): 505–522.
Herbert, Robert K., and H. Stephen Straight. 1989. ‘Compliment-Rejection versus Compliment-Avoidance: Listener-Based versus Speaker-Based Pragmatic Strategies’. Language & Communication 9 (1): 35–47.
Holmes, Janet. 1984. ‘Modifying Illocutionary Force’. Journal of Pragmatics 8 (3): 345–65.
. 1986. ‘Compliments and Compliment Responses in New Zealand English’. Anthropological Linguistics 28 (4): 485–508.
. 1988. ‘Paying Compliments: A Sex-Preferential Positive Politeness Strategy’. Journal of Pragmatics 12 (3): 445–65.
. 2005. ‘Leadership Talk: How Do Leaders “Do Mentoring”, and Is Gender Relevant?’ Journal of Pragmatics 37 (11): 1779–1800.
. 2009. ‘Men, Masculinities and Leadership: Different Discourse Styles at Work’. In Gender and Spoken Interaction, ed. by Pia Pichler and Eva Eppler, 186–210. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Holmes, Janet, and Meredith Marra. 2004. ‘Leadership and Managing Conflict in Meetings’. Pragmatics 14 (4): 439–62.
Íñigo-Mora, Isabel. 2004. ‘On the Use of the Personal Pronoun We in Communities’. Journal of Language and Politics 3 (1): 27–52.
Kiesling, Scott Fabius. forthcoming. Stance and Stancetaking: Theory and Practice in Sociolinguistics. [URL]
. 2004. ‘Dude’. American Speech 79 (3): 281–305.
. 2009. ‘Style as Stance’. In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, edited by Alexandra M Jaffe, 171. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
. 2011. ‘Stance in Context: Affect, Alignment and Investment in the Analysis of Stancetaking’. In IMean 2011. UWE Bristol. [URL]
Kitagawa, Chisato, and Adrienne Lehrer. 1990. ‘Impersonal Uses of Personal Pronouns’. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (5): 739–59.
Ochs, Elinor. 1993. ‘Constructing Social Identity: A Language Socialization Perspective’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26 (3): 287–306.
Oh, Sun-Young. 2010. ‘Invoking Categories through Co-Present Person Reference: The Case of Korean Conversation’. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (5): 1219–42.
Quirk, Randolph, S Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and J Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.
Raelin, Joe. 2011. ‘From Leadership-as-Practice to Leaderful Practice’. Leadership 7 (2): 195–211.
Richards, Keith. 2010. ‘Professional Orientation in Back Region Humor’. Text & Talk– An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 30 (2): 145– 167.
Vine, Bernadette. 2004. Getting Things Done at Work: The Discourse of Power in Workplace Interaction. Pragmatics & Beyond, new ser. v. 124. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: John Benjamins.
. 2009. ‘Directives at Work: Exploring the Contextual Complexity of Workplace Directives’. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (7): 1395–1405.
Wales, Katie. 1996. Personal Pronouns in Present -Day English. Cambridge [England] ;New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wieczorek, Anna Ewa. 2009. ‘This Is to Say You’re Either in or out: Some Remarks on Clusivity’. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 3 (2): 118–29.
. 2010. ‘“And I Quote”: Direct and Indirect Point-of-View Switches in Clusivity-Oriented Discourse’. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6 (2): 229–247.
Wilson, Nick. 2010. ‘Bros, Boys and Guys: Address Term Function and Communities of Practice in a New Zealand Rugby Team’. New Zealand English Journal 24: 33–54.
. 2013. ‘Interaction without Walls: Analysing Leadership Discourse through Dramaturgy and Participation’. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17 (2): 180–199.
. 2017. ‘Developing Distributed Leadership: Leadership Emergence in a Sporting Context’. In Challenging Leadership Stereotypes through Discourse: Power, Management and Gender., ed. by Cornelia Ilie and Stephanie Schnurr, 147–70. Singapore: Springer.
. 2018. ‘Linguistic Ethnography’. In The Routledge Handbook of Language in the Workplace, ed. by Bernadette Vine, 40–50. Abingdon: Routledge.
Wolfson, Nessa, and Joan Manes. 1980. ‘The Compliment as a Social Strategy’. Paper in Linguistics 13 (3): 391–410.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Ponton, Douglas Mark, Vladimir I. Ozyumenko & Tatiana V. Larina
Piippo, Irina
2021. Mirror-like address practice in Arabic-medium classroom interaction. In Intersubjectivity in Action [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 326], ► pp. 109 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.