Cover not available
Part of
The Social Dynamics of Pronominal Systems: A comparative approach
Edited by Paul Bouissac
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 304] 2019
► pp. 75–98

Chapter 4
Address pronouns and alternatives

Challenges and solutions when translating between two polycentric languages (English and Portuguese)

| University of Wolverhampton

Polycentric languages experience variation. Address pronouns and other forms of address constitute an area which is particularly open to national preferences, where the language is influenced by different cultural backgrounds and performs at the service of different social dynamics. In translation work, achieving comparable renderings between the source language and the target language will require a discerning awareness of specific sociological and sociolinguistic characteristics in the relevant places of origin and destination of the text being converted. This chapter examines challenges and proposes solutions for those decoding and encoding between English and Portuguese. It does so using a framework of evaluation deemed to promote insight and using techniques that are transferable to other language pairs, particularly where English is involved.

Keywords: translation and interpreting, source language and target language, polycentric languages, national and regional variation, second-person systems, address pronouns, forms of address, English language, Portuguese language
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Behind today’s second-person system – English and Portuguese
  • Today’s second-person system in the Anglophone world
  • Today’s second-person system in the Lusophone world
  • N-V-T dynamics
  • Translating from Portuguese
    • Preparing for the job
    • On the job
    • Learning from the job
  • Translating from English
    • Preparing for the job
    • On the job
    • Learning from the job
  • Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.304.04coo
References
Arden, Mathias, Christina Märzhäuser, and Benjamin Meisnitzer
2011 Linguística do português: Rumos e pontes. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Azevedo, Milton
2005 Portuguese: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baugh, Albert C., and Thomas Cable
2002 A History of the English Language. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bechara, Evanildo
2015 Moderna Gramática Portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Nova Fronteira Participações.Google Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley, and Braj Kachru
2006 World Englishes. Critical Concepts in Linguistics, Vol I-VI. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Braun, Friedrike
1988 “Terms of Address. Problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures.” Journal of Linguistics 26 (1): 265–274.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987 Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger and Albert Gilman
1960 “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” In Style in Language, ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 253–276. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael, Catrin Norrby, and Jane Warren
2009 Language and Human Relations. Styles of Address in Contemporary Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, Manuela
2013 “Portuguese Pronouns and Other Forms of Address, from the Past into the Future – Structural, Semantic and Pragmatic Reflections.” Ellipsis (renamed Journal of Lusophone Studies ) 11: 267- 290.Google Scholar
2014 “Beyond T and V – Theoretical Reflections on the Analysis of Forms of Address.” American Journal of Linguistics 3(1):17- 26.Google Scholar
2015 “A Home for You – Where does the neutral pronoun ‘you’ fit within the T-V binary? Manuela Cook considers the ‘N’ dimension.” The Linguist. Chartered Institute of Linguists 54 (3): 20–21.Google Scholar
Crystal, David
2005 The Stories of English. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Formentelli, Maicol
2007 “The vocative mate in contemporary English: A corpus based study.” In Language Resources and Linguistic Theory, ed. by A. Sansò, 180–199. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Andy
2007 World Englishes: Implications for International Communication and English Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd, Edgar Schneider, Kate Burridge, Rajend Mesthrie, and Clive Upton
2008 Varieties of English. I-IV. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Laguna, Asela
2001 Global Impact of the Portuguese Language. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1999 “The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation.” In Studies in honour of Stig Johansson, ed. by H. Hasselgård, and S. Oksefiell, 107–118. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Moita-Lopes, Luiz Paulo
2015 Global Portuguese: Linguistic Ideologies in Late Modernity. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar