Cover not available
Part of
The Social Dynamics of Pronominal Systems: A comparative approach
Edited by Paul Bouissac
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 304] 2019
► pp. 75–98

Chapter 4
Address pronouns and alternatives

Challenges and solutions when translating between two polycentric languages (English and Portuguese)

| University of Wolverhampton
Polycentric languages experience variation. Address pronouns and other forms of address constitute an area which is particularly open to national preferences, where the language is influenced by different cultural backgrounds and performs at the service of different social dynamics. In translation work, achieving comparable renderings between the source language and the target language will require a discerning awareness of specific sociological and sociolinguistic characteristics in the relevant places of origin and destination of the text being converted. This chapter examines challenges and proposes solutions for those decoding and encoding between English and Portuguese. It does so using a framework of evaluation deemed to promote insight and using techniques that are transferable to other language pairs, particularly where English is involved.
Keywords: translation and interpreting, source language and target language, polycentric languages, national and regional variation, second-person systems, address pronouns, forms of address, English language, Portuguese language
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Behind today’s second-person system – English and Portuguese
  • Today’s second-person system in the Anglophone world
  • Today’s second-person system in the Lusophone world
  • N-V-T dynamics
  • Translating from Portuguese
    • Preparing for the job
    • On the job
    • Learning from the job
  • Translating from English
    • Preparing for the job
    • On the job
    • Learning from the job
  • Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.304.04coo
References (19)
References
Arden, Mathias, Christina Märzhäuser, and Benjamin Meisnitzer. 2011. Linguística do português: Rumos e pontes. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Azevedo, Milton. 2005. Portuguese: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baugh, Albert C., and Thomas Cable. 2002. A History of the English Language. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bechara, Evanildo. 2015. Moderna Gramática Portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Nova Fronteira Participações.Google Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley, and Braj Kachru. 2006. World Englishes. Critical Concepts in Linguistics, Vol I-VI. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Braun, Friedrike. 1988. “Terms of Address. Problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures.” Journal of Linguistics 26 (1): 265–274.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger and Albert Gilman. 1960. “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” In Style in Language, ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 253–276. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael, Catrin Norrby, and Jane Warren. 2009. Language and Human Relations. Styles of Address in Contemporary Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, Manuela. 2013. “Portuguese Pronouns and Other Forms of Address, from the Past into the Future – Structural, Semantic and Pragmatic Reflections.” Ellipsis (renamed Journal of Lusophone Studies) 11: 267- 290.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Beyond T and V – Theoretical Reflections on the Analysis of Forms of Address.” American Journal of Linguistics 3(1):17- 26.Google Scholar
. 2015. “A Home for You – Where does the neutral pronoun ‘you’ fit within the T-V binary? Manuela Cook considers the ‘N’ dimension.” The Linguist. Chartered Institute of Linguists 54 (3): 20–21.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2005. The Stories of English. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Formentelli, Maicol. 2007. “The vocative mate in contemporary English: A corpus based study.” In Language Resources and Linguistic Theory, ed. by A. Sansò, 180–199. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Andy. 2007. World Englishes: Implications for International Communication and English Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd, Edgar Schneider, Kate Burridge, Rajend Mesthrie, and Clive Upton. 2008. Varieties of English. I-IV. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Laguna, Asela. 2001. Global Impact of the Portuguese Language. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1999. “The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation.” In Studies in honour of Stig Johansson, ed. by H. Hasselgård, and S. Oksefiell, 107–118. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Moita-Lopes, Luiz Paulo. 2015. Global Portuguese: Linguistic Ideologies in Late Modernity. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar