Cover not available
Part of
Empirical Studies of the Construction of Discourse
Edited by Óscar Loureda, Inés Recio Fernández, Laura Nadal and Adriana Cruz
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 305] 2019
► pp. 1–14

Introduction

| Heidelberg University
| Heidelberg University
| Heidelberg University
| EAN University
Published online: 6 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.305.int
References (63)
References
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blühdorn, Hardarik, Ad Foolen, and Óscar Loureda. 2017. “Diskursmarker: Begriffsgeschichte – Theorie – Beschreibung. Ein bibliographischer Überblick.” In Diskursmarker im Deutschen. Reflexionen und Analysen, ed. by Hardarik Blühdorn, Arnulf Deppermann, Henrike Helmer, and Tomas Spranz-Fogasy, 7–48. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio. 2013. “El relato coloquial.” Oral presentation at the XXVIII Congreso de Hispanistas Italianos. Pisa, Italy, 27–30.Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio, and Grupo Val.Es.Co. 2002. Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
2003. “Un sistema de unidades para el estudio del lenguaje coloquial.” Oralia 6: 7361.Google Scholar
2014. “Las unidades del discurso oral. La propuesta Val.Es.Co. de segmentación de la conversación (coloquial).” Estudios de lingüística del español 35(1): 11–71.Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio, and Salvador Pons Bordería. 2010. “Unidades, marcadores discursivos y posición.” In Los estudios sobre marcadores del discurso en español, hoy, ed. by Óscar Loureda, and Esperanza Acín, 327–358. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Cabedo, Adrián, and Salvador Pons. 2013. Corpus Val.Es.Co. 2.0. [online: [URL]].
Clark, Herbert H., and Adrian Bangerter. 2004. “Changing ideas about reference.” In Experimental Pragmatics, ed. by Ira A. Noveck and Dan Sperber, 25–49. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1955–56. “Determinación y entorno. Dos problemas de una lingüística del hablar.” Romanistisches Jahrbuch VII: 29–54.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela. 2000. Corpus di Italiano parlato. Florence: Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Rainer. 2002. Psycholinguistik. Stuttgart, Weimar: J. B. Metzler. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escandell, María Victoria, and Manuel Leonetti. 2011. “On the Rigidity of Procedural Meaning.” In Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, ed. by María Victoria Escandell, Manuel Leonetti, and Aoife Ahern, 81–102. Bingley: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Angela, Luca Cignetti, and Anna-Maria De Cesare. 2008. L’interfaccia lingua-testo. Natura e funzioni dell’articolazione informative dell’enunciato. Alessandria: Edizione dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Flórez, Óscar. 1995. “La posición del adjetivo: una perspectiva pragmática.” Dicenda: Cuadernos de filología hispánica 13: 163–174.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1999. “What are discourse markers?” Journal of Pragmatics 31: 931–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. 2004. “Psycholinguistic Experiments and Linguistic-Pragmatics.” In Experimental Pragmatics, ed. by Ira Noveck and Dan Sperber, 50–71. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2009. “What is Corpus Linguistics?” Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(5): 1225–1241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan. 2013. Statistics for Linguistics with R, A Practical Introduction. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th., Beate Hampe, and Doris Schönefeld. 2005. “Converging Evidence: Bringing together Experimental and Corpus Data on the Association of Verbs and Constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics 16 (4): 635–676. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guilquin, Gaëtanelle, and Stefan Th. Gries. 2009. “Corpora and experimental methods: A state-of-the-art review.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5(1): 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo Navarro, Antonio, and Adrián Cabedo Nebot. 2012. “Observaciones sobre la importancia de la entonación en la enseñanza de E/LE: aspectos metodológicos.” Cauce. Revista de Filología y su Didáctica 34–35: 209–230.Google Scholar
Itknonen, Esa. 2003. What is language? A Study in the Philosophy of Linguistics. University of Turku, Turku: Publications in General Linguistics 8.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas. 2009. “Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory. The case of compliments.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1611–1635. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamide, Yuki, Gerry T. M. Altmann, and Sarah L. Haywood. 2003. “The Time-course of Prediction in Incremental Sentence Processing: Evidence from Anticipatory Eye Movements.” Journal of Memory and Language 49 (1): 133–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kenesei, István. 2006. “Focus as Identification.” In The architecture of focus, ed. by Valéria Molnár, and Susanne Winkler, 137–168. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard. 2005. The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lenk, Uta. 1998. “Discourse Markers and Global Coherence in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 30: 245–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel, and Escandell Vidal, María Victoria. 2004. “Semántica conceptual/semántica procedimental.” In Proceedings of the V Congreso de Lingüística General, ed. by Milka Villayandre Llamazares, 1727–1738. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
López Serena, Araceli. 2006. “La edición como construcción del objeto de estudio. El ejemplo de los corpus orales.” In Historia de la Lengua y Crítica Textual, ed. by Lola Pons Rodríguez, 301–333. Madrid/Frankfurt am Main: Iberoamericana-Vervuert.Google Scholar
. 2016. “El establecimiento de niveles y unidades en el análisis del discurso. Una primera aproximación metateórica.” In El español a través del tiempo. Estudios ofrecidos a Rafael Cano Aguilar, ed. by Antonio Narbona Jiménez, and Santiago del Rey Quesada, vol. 2, 1152–1175. Sevilla: Editorial Universidad de Sevilla.Google Scholar
. 2018. “Intuición, teoría y datos en historia de la lengua. Las hipótesis sobre la gramaticalización del por cierto epistémico en español a la luz de la Filosofía de la lingüística.” Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana (RILI) 31, 163–185.Google Scholar
Loureda, Óscar, and Esperanza Acín. 2010. Los estudios sobre marcadores del discurso en español, hoy. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques. 1989. Modélisation du dialogue. Répresentation de l’inférence argumentative. Paris: Hermès.Google Scholar
Murillo, Silvia. 2010. “Los marcadores del discurso y su semántica.” In Los estudios sobre marcadores del discurso, hoy, ed. by Óscar Loureda, and Esperanza Acín, 241–280. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Neuber, Baldur. 2002. Prosodische Formen in Funktion. Leistungen der Suprasegmentalia für das Verstehen, Behalten und die Bedeutungs(re)konstruktion. Frankfurt M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Noveck, Ira and Dan Sperber. 2004. Experimental Pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noveck, Ira A., and Dan Sperber. 2007. “The why and how of experimental pragmatics: The case of ‘scalar inferences’.” In Pragmatics, ed. by Noel Burton-Roberts, 184–212. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pander Maat, Henk, and Ted J. M. Sanders. 2001. “Subjectivity in Causal Connectives: An Empirical Study of Language in Use.” Cognitive Linguistics 12(3): 247–273.Google Scholar
Pons, Salvador. 1998. “Conexión y conectores. Estudio de su relación en el registro informal de la lengua.” PhD diss., Universitat de València.Google Scholar
. 2014. Discourse Segmentation in Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pons, Salvador, and Óscar Loureda. 2018. Discourse Markers in Grammaticalization and Constructionalization: New Issues in the Study of Language Change. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Portolés, José. 2001 [1998]. Los marcadores del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Los marcadores del discurso y la estructura informativa.” In Los estudios sobre marcadores del discurso en español, hoy, ed. by Óscar Loureda, and Esperanza Acín, 281–325. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Marcadores del discurso.” In Enciclopedia de lingüística hispánica, ed. by Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach, 689–699. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.Google Scholar
Roulet, Eddy. 1991. “Vers une approche modulaire de l’analyse du discours.” Cahiers de Linguistique Française 12: 53–81.Google Scholar
Roulet, Eddy, Antoine Auchlin, Jacques Moeschler, Christian Rubattel, and Marie Schelling. 1985. L’articulation du discours en français contemporain. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Roulet, Eddy, Laurent Filliettaz, Marcel Burger, and Anne Grobet. 2001. Un modèle et un instrument d’analyse de l’organisation du discours. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted J. M. 2005. “Coherence, causality and cognitive complexity in discourse.” In Proceedings/Acts SEM-05, First International Symposium on the exploration and modeling of meaning, ed. by Michel Aurnague, Myriam Bras, Anne Le Draoulec, and Laure Vieu, 105–114.Google Scholar
Sandra, Dominiek. 2009. “Experimentation.” In Cognition and Pragmatics, ed. by Dominiek Sandra, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jef Verschueren, 157–200. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandra, Dominiek, and Sally Rice. 1995. “Network analysis of prepositional meanings: Mirroring whose mind – The linguist’s or the language user’s?” Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1): 89–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Discourse Markers.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton, 54–75. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995 [1986]. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Pragmatics, Modularity and Mind-Reading.” Mind and Language 17: 3–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Ira Noveck. 2004. “Introduction.” In Experimental Pragmatics, ed. by Ira Noveck, and Dan Sperber, 1–22. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 2007. “On texts, corpora and models of language.” In Text, Discourse and Corpora. Theory and Analysis, ed. by Michael Hoey, Michaela Mahlberg, Michael Stubbs, and Wolfgang Teubert, 127–161. London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thagard, Paul. 2005. Mind. Introduction to Cognitive Science. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 2009. “Introduction: The pragmatic perspective.” In Key Notions for Pragmatics, ed. by Jef Verschueren, and Jan-Ola Östman, 1–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2003. “Relevance and Lexical Pragmatics.” Italian journal of linguistics 15: 273–292.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2002. “Truthfulness and Relevance.” Mind 111: 583–632. DOI logoGoogle Scholar