Cover not available
Part of
Reference and Identity in Public Discourses
Edited by Ursula Lutzky and Minna Nevala
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 306] 2019
► pp. 19–41

Two miserable creatures or those atrocious criminals?

Evaluative reference in the Mannings murder reporting

| Tampere University
This chapter studies the way in which an infamous nineteenth-century couple, Frederick and Maria Manning, was described in the news of a murder case, and how by the use of person reference they were placed into a particular social group. The interest is in whether the social representation of murderers became the way in which the Mannings were described as individuals, and in whether the resulting social identities could be considered stable or variable. The study shows that although evaluative reference was mostly rather neutral in tone, the Mannings were in general referred to as negatively as other nineteenth-century murderers. However, there was also situational variation linked to momentary empathy, which made the couple’s social representation less stable than expected.
Keywords: social representation, evaluative language, person reference, Manning, Victorian press
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Social representation and evaluative reference
  • 3.Crime news in nineteenth-century Britain: The Mannings murder in focus
  • 4.The data and method
  • 5.Evaluative reference to the Mannings
    • 5.1Degree of evaluation
    • 5.2Explicit evaluation
    • 5.3Implicit evaluation
  • 6.Conclusions on the Mannings murder reporting
    • 6.1General trends
    • 6.2Culprits, creatures, or criminals?
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 October 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.306.01nev
References (30)
References
Alba-Juez, Laura, and Geoff Thompson. 2014. “The Many Faces and Phases of Evaluation.” In Evaluation in Context, ed. by Geoff Thompson, and Laura Alba-Juez, 3–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allport, Gordon. 1986. “The Language of Prejudice.” In Language Awareness, ed. by Paul Escholz, Alfred Rosa, and Virginia Clark, 261–270. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika, and Helen Caple. 2012. News Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Clark, Kate. 1992. “The Linguistics of Blame: Representations of Women in the Sun’s Reporting of Crimes of Sexual Violence.” In Language, Text and Context: Essays in Stylistics, ed. by Michael Toolan, 208–224. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Conboy, Martin. 2002. The Press and Popular Culture. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
. 2010. The Language of Newspapers: Socio-Historical Perspectives. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Diamond, Michael. 2003. Victorian Sensation, or the Spectacular, the Shocking and the Scandalous in Nineteenth-Century Britain. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. 1852–1853. Bleak House. London: Bradbury & Evans.Google Scholar
Emsley, Clive. 2005. Crime and Society in England, 1750–1900. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Hogg, Michael A. 2005. “Uncertainty, Social Identity and Ideology.” In Social Identification in Groups, ed. by Shane R. Thye, and Edward J. Lawler, 203–229. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Michael A., and Dominic Abrams. 1988. Social Identifications. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2007. “Using a Corpus to Investigate Stance Quantitatively and Qualitatively.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 27–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linnane, Fergus. 2003. London: The Wicked City. London: Robson Books.Google Scholar
. 2004. London’s Underworld: Three Centuries of Vice and Crime. London: Robson Books.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. 2000. “Beyond Exchange: Appraisal Systems in English.” In Evaluation in Text, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoff Thompson, 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, James R., and Peter R. R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinez Caro, Elena. 2014. “The Expression of Evaluation in Weekly News in English.” In Evaluation in Context, ed. by Geoff Thompson, and Laura Alba-Juez, 321–343. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayr, Andrea, and David Machin. 2012. The Language of Crime and Deviance: An Introduction to Critical Linguistic Analysis in Media and Popular Culture. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Moscovici, Serge. 1984. “The Phenomenon of Social Representations.” In Social Representations, ed. by Robert M. Farr, and Serge Moscovici, 3–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nevala, Minna. 2016. “Solidarity in Evaluation: The Portrayal of Murderers and Their Victims in Late Nineteenth-Century Newspapers.” In The Pragmatics and Stylistics of Identity Construction and Characterisation (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 17), ed. Minna Nevala, Ursula Lutzky, Gabriella Mazzon, and Carla Suhr. Helsinki: VARIENG. Available online at: [URL] (accessed 15 April 2019).
. 2017. “The Public Identity of Jack the Ripper in Nineteenth-Century Newspapers.” In Diachronic Developments in English News Discourse, ed. by Minna Palander-Collin, Maura Ratia, and Irma Taavitsainen, 199–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1993. “Constructing Social Identity: A Language Socialization Perspective.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26: 287–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Reilly, Carole. 2014. “‘Dirt, Death and Disease’: Newspaper Discourses on Public Health in the Construction of the Modern British City.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15: 207–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabbert, Ulrike. 2015. Crime and Corpus: The Linguistic Representation of Crime in the Press. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff, and Susan Hunston. 2000. “Evaluation: An Introduction.” In Evaluation in Text, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoff Thompson, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2009. Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Peter R. R. 2001. “Appraisal Outline.” [URL] (accessed 15 April 2019).
Wodak, Ruth. 2008. “‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Inclusion/Exclusion – Discrimination via Discourse.” In Migration, Identity, and Belonging, ed. by Gerard Delanty, Ruth Wodak, and Paul Jones, 54–78. Liverpool: University of Liverpool Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Limatius, Hanna & Minna Nevala
2024. Chapter 6. Intragroup marginalization in social media. In Self- and Other-Reference in Social Contexts [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 342], ► pp. 114 ff. DOI logo
Shurma, Svitlana
2024. Perpetrators in multimodal media discourse: a case study of personalization in images from The Telegraph. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1 DOI logo
Chaemsaithong, Krisda & Yoonjeong Kim
2023. Making death (in)different: discursive legitimation in death trials. Social Semiotics 33:4 ► pp. 841 ff. DOI logo
Nevala, Minna & Jukka Tyrkkö
2023. Chapter 7. From criminal lunacy to mental disorder. In Exploring Language and Society with Big Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 111], ► pp. 194 ff. DOI logo
Chaemsaithong, Krisda
2022. Moral legitimation in capital trials: the case of the prosecution’s closing summation. Text & Talk 42:6 ► pp. 849 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.