Cover not available
Part of
Reference and Identity in Public Discourses
Edited by Ursula Lutzky and Minna Nevala
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 306] 2019
► pp. 281–281

Index

A

  • address 7, 82, 149, 229, 231, 243
    • address forms / forms of address 7, 67, 69, 72, 89–90, 92, 152, 208, 211, 216, 241, 262
    • address terms / terms of address 7, 71, 101, 141, 151, 228–229, 231, 243–244
    • addressivity 127, 139, 142–143
    • direct address 69, 88, 90, 142, 144
    • nominal address 82, 89, 227, 231–232
  • affection 227, 229, 232, 246
  • agglomerative clustering algorithm107
  • agreement 148–151
  • ambient audiences183
  • ambient bonds193
  • AntConc 74, 163
  • argumentation 43, 163
    • claim 163–166, 168–174
    • data 163–166, 168–171, 173
    • Toulmin’s model of argumentation163
    • warrant 163–164, 171, 173
  • argumentum ad verecundiam 167, 171, 173
  • ars dictaminis 72, 85, 89

B

  • Big Data100
  • blog 127–129, 131, 134, 146, 152
  • British parliamentary debates 97–98, 100, 102, 119

C

  • central terms101
  • chat 205, 209–211, 213–214, 217, 219, 221–222
  • cluster 110–113, 115, 119, 145, 148–152, 154, 157–158
    • hierarchical cluster analysis 107, 110–111
  • coda 193, 196–197
  • collectivism193
  • collectivity 184, 220
  • collocation 127, 146, 163
    • collocates 77–78, 84–85, 92, 108, 117–118, 146–148, 150–152, 157–158, 163–164, 168, 171
  • comments 127, 129, 130–132, 134–137, 139, 141–144, 146–149, 153–154, 227–228, 242–243, 245–246
    • comment threads 131, 139, 141, 143–144, 146, 150, 153–155
    • commenter communities144
    • commenters 129, 136–141, 143–144, 146, 148–149, 153–154
    • online comments 139, 227
    • reader comments 127–130, 133, 153
  • communication
    • online communication 185, 207, 222
    • political communication 43–44, 181–183, 185–186, 199
    • social media communication 251, 255–256
  • communities 21, 127, 129, 138, 144–145, 154, 191
    • community of practice102
  • comparison argumentation166
  • conceptualisation 252–257, 259–261, 269
    • discourse-specific conceptualisation 255, 257–258, 260, 269
  • concordance 163–164, 169–170, 172
  • condescension 228–229, 232, 240, 244, 246
  • consensus 161, 176
  • context collapse182n1
  • corpora 54, 73, 77, 80, 82, 84, 99, 105, 127–128, 130, 162–163, 181, 186–191, 197, 199, 212
    • Birmingham Blog Corpus 131, 146
    • Brigham Young University suite54
    • Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies 99, 159
    • corpus linguistic 97, 127, 129, 153, 155, 181, 187
    • Exceptional Women’s Letters corpus (EWL) 73–88, 90–92
    • Guardian corpus131
    • Hansard Corpus 97–98, 100, 102–103, 105–106, 119
    • newspaper corpus130
    • Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence (PCEEC) 76–86, 92–93
    • The Salamanca Corpus45
  • correspondence 67–68, 70–72, 74, 76–77, 79, 81–84, 86–87, 90, 92–93
  • Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) 182, 184
  • cultural diversity244
  • cultural shifts 98, 100, 110

D

  • deictic forms208
  • diabetes 205–216, 219–222
  • disagreement 148–151
  • disalignment 148, 154, 231, 235
  • donds 127, 147, 152–154, 157–158

E

  • early modern women 67, 73
  • epistolary 67–69, 71–73, 76, 79, 81, 83, 85–86, 89, 91–93
  • European Union (EU) 159–178, 192–198
    • Brexit 181, 186–187, 194–198
    • EU Referendum 181–183, 186–187, 189, 194, 198–199
    • exit procedures166
    • Leave campaign 181, 191, 194–195, 198
    • Remain campaign 181, 183, 186, 188, 190, 195–196
  • evaluation 20–23, 27–28, 30, 32, 35, 37–38, 148
    • degree of evaluation 20–21, 27–30, 37
    • explicit evaluation 27, 30, 33, 38
    • implicit evaluation 34, 38
    • linguistic evaluation22

F

  • family 97–98, 101–102, 106, 109, 112–113, 116, 119–120
  • forum 127, 151, 154, 205, 208–215, 217–222
  • frame 251, 254–255, 257–261, 265–266, 268–270, 272, 274, 276–277
    • [COUNTRY]-frame 255, 260–261, 269
    • discourse-specific configuration of frames 258–261, 269
    • frame-based discourse analysis 257, 259
    • [PARTY]-frame 260–261, 269
  • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 205, 209–212, 219–222
  • friend 90–91, 106–107, 116, 175

G

  • gender 48, 53, 67, 73, 79, 83, 87, 89, 93, 97–99, 101–102, 109, 119–120, 227, 234, 241, 243
    • femininity 68–69, 92
    • masculine 73, 85, 92
    • masculinity 79, 93
  • Goffman’s terms 161, 210
    • back stage 161, 164, 177
    • front stage 161–162, 164, 176–177
  • Grounded Theory 251, 259
  • group 4–6, 10, 20–23, 43–44, 184
    • group membership 4, 8, 22–23, 183–184, 212
    • in-group 4–6, 8, 21, 45, 49, 152–154, 166–167, 182–183, 212, 254
    • intragroup consensus4
    • out-group 4–6, 8, 20–22, 38–39, 182–183, 185, 212
    • social group 2, 7, 19–20, 43, 46, 68, 92, 252
    • societal group2

H

  • hashtag 185, 187, 189, 192–193, 196, 199, 251, 253–256, 269, 276–277
  • healthcare 205–211, 214, 217–222

I

  • identity 1–6, 43–44, 52, 67–70, 84, 98, 127, 138, 160, 176, 178, 205–226, 254, 261
    • collective identity 6, 162, 199, 205, 208, 221–222
    • group identity 4, 7, 43, 197
    • identity construction 1–4, 6, 68, 72, 181–182, 194, 205–209, 213, 219, 222, 261
    • identity markers 1, 3, 53, 62
    • ingroup identity254
    • national identity 5–6, 184
    • networked identities183
    • online identity 3, 154–155
    • personal identity 4, 206, 221–222
    • professional identity 205, 219, 227–228, 237–238, 246
    • public identity 20, 228
    • representation of identity3
    • social identification8
    • social identity 4–6, 19–21, 39, 69
    • we-identity 189, 192–197
  • imagined collectives 181, 183, 199
  • immigration 181, 193–194
  • indexicality 69–70, 73, 76, 183, 192
  • individualization thesis119
  • interaction 21, 71, 74, 82, 86, 89, 92, 139, 141, 144, 146, 148, 153–155, 205–211, 221–222
  • intercultural mis­un­der­stand­ing 227–228, 241
  • interpersonal 70–74, 78–79, 81, 83, 85–86, 90, 93, 146, 177, 229, 255
  • interviewer 227–228, 232, 235, 238, 241, 245, 247
  • involvement 183, 199

J

  • Jacobite risings 47, 53, 54n16

K

  • keywords 79–82, 86, 134–135, 137–138, 153, 186–187, 255
  • kinship 81, 90, 97–98, 100–102, 105–112, 115–120, 124

L

  • label 22–23, 30, 43–51, 53–57, 61–62, 212–213, 216, 255, 259
    • labelling 3, 8, 21–22, 27, 32, 34, 53
    • negative labelling 8, 22, 32
  • legislative discourse 98, 100–101, 112–113
  • letters 67–79, 81–83
    • holograph letter 74–75, 84–90, 92
    • scribal letter 71–75, 83–88, 90–93
  • linguistic trauma100
  • Lisbon Treaty166

M

  • machismo 227, 232–234, 243–244, 246
  • memberships of discontent197
  • metaphor 51, 167, 170, 182, 198, 260
  • multimodal 254–260, 277
    • multimodal discourse analysis 251, 255, 257
    • multimodal semiotic resource259
  • murder 19–21, 24–26, 28, 30–34, 36–38
    • criminals 19–23, 25, 36, 38–39
    • murder reporting 19, 29, 37
    • victims 20, 22, 31, 36, 39

N

  • narrativity193
  • Native American 49, 51
  • Network Graphs144
  • networked bonding182
  • newspapers 20, 24, 26–28, 31–34, 37–39, 103, 105, 108, 127–130, 134, 145, 148, 153–154
    • news reports 20–21, 28–29, 37, 104
    • news(paper) articles 20, 26–27, 127–129, 153
    • newspaper comment threads 150, 154
    • newspaper comments 146, 148

P

  • patients 205–211, 213–222
  • pluricentric language240
  • Polish 251–253, 262–263, 266–272, 274, 276
  • politeness 45, 241
    • face 228, 232–234, 236, 238–239, 247
    • impolite235
    • polite 82, 232, 235
  • political campaigning 181–182, 198–199
  • political news interview 227, 230–231
  • politician 104, 183–187, 194, 198–199, 230–234, 245, 254, 260, 262, 269–270, 272–273
  • popular culture 43–45, 47, 56, 59
    • films 47–48, 51, 58–60
    • literature 47–48, 50, 59
    • songs 44, 50, 55–56
    • TV series 55, 58
  • power asymmetries230
  • pragmatic(s) 1, 8–9, 13, 45–46, 61–62, 68, 76, 82–83, 86, 88, 129, 138, 146, 155, 205, 208, 227, 229
    • meta-pragmatic 72, 78, 85
    • socio-pragmatic(s) 1, 46, 67, 74
  • pronouns 7–8, 67, 73, 77, 79, 82–84, 87, 90, 183–189, 191, 199, 209, 212, 218, 243
    • exclusive we 84, 184, 189
    • I/we (first-person) 6–7, 70–71, 77–79, 81, 84–87, 183–185, 188, 191
    • inclusive we 184–185, 189–190, 198, 215–216, 220
    • personal pronouns 6, 11, 23, 167, 181–191, 197–199, 243
    • possessive pronouns 106–111, 113, 115, 119, 187, 190
    • royal we 84–87, 91–92, 184
    • self-reference pronouns 90, 92
    • you/ye (second-person) 69, 77, 79, 82–83, 87–88, 183–184
  • public discourse 1–2, 13
  • public sphere 159–162, 178, 229, 252
    • European public sphere160
    • general public spheres 161–162
    • general transnational public sphere 161–162

R

  • recipient 67–68, 71–74, 76, 78–79, 81–82, 85–92
  • reference 1–3, 6–9, 97–98, 100–102, 106–108, 111–117, 119, 127, 140–145, 149, 184–185, 189, 193, 205, 220, 227
    • audience references188
    • evaluative reference 19, 21, 23, 27–28, 30, 37–38
    • other-reference 6, 188, 191
    • person reference 6, 8–9, 19–21, 27, 29, 209, 216
    • reference expressions 7–9
    • reference markers 1–3
    • self-reference 6–7, 67, 69–74, 76–77, 84–88, 90–92
      • plural self-references 188, 191, 197
      • singular self-references 188, 190–191
    • terms of reference 8–9, 23, 27, 141, 159–160, 162, 165, 176–177, 227, 243
  • register 26, 67, 77, 83, 86, 105, 131, 211
  • representation 3–4, 13, 50, 58, 97–98, 100–101, 108, 119, 160, 164, 206, 211, 220
    • other-representation 3, 12, 206, 208, 211
    • self-representation 206, 208, 211, 214
    • social representation 19–23, 38–39
  • representation of kin100
  • representation of social actors164
    • sociologically activated or passivated164
    • specified or genericised164
  • respect 57, 89–90, 151, 227, 232, 236–237, 240, 244
  • rhetoric 181, 197
    • person-centred rhetoric185
    • rhetoric of hope198
    • rhetorical devices 184, 198

S

  • scale of sovereignty177
  • Scottish 44, 54, 56–58
  • self-presentation 8, 185, 192
    • negative self-presentation192
  • signified 162, 164, 176–177
  • signifier 162, 176–177
  • Sketch Engine187
  • small stories193
  • sociolinguistic 68, 83, 98–99, 108
  • socio-onomastics45
    • autonym49
    • diminutive 54, 90, 227–229, 232, 237–238, 240–241, 243–244, 246
    • first names 52–53, 58, 227–229, 231–232, 238–241, 245–246
    • names 44–46, 48–55, 72, 81, 227–228, 263–265, 276
    • nicknames 44–50, 53, 59, 62, 82, 243, 270
    • pseudonyms 44, 46–48, 62
    • slurs46
    • surnames 45, 53
    • toponym 45–46, 62
    • usernames 6, 136–144, 146–152, 154, 157
  • sovereignty 159, 164–166, 168–169, 172–173, 176–178
  • Spanish 205, 209, 212, 218, 227–229, 231, 233, 246–247
  • stance 3, 21–23, 30, 45, 62, 67–74, 83–86, 90–93, 148, 154–155
    • affective 69, 78, 81, 84, 86, 90, 92
    • epistemic 69, 78
  • style 31–32, 37–39, 69, 72–73, 83, 85–86, 92–93, 102, 108, 120, 151, 182, 191, 198
    • group-centred style 185–186, 197, 199
    • impersonal style183
    • involved style183
  • subjectivity 24, 56, 62, 69, 73, 81, 84, 86, 89–90, 92–93
  • synonymia 88, 92

T

  • term of endearment 231, 243
  • topic 127, 129–130, 134, 144, 153–154
  • turn allocation231
  • Twitter 6, 181–183, 185–187, 199, 251–253, 255–256, 260, 276
    • influential tweets 183, 187–189, 197–198

V

  • VARD 74, 76
  • Victorian press19

W

  • Ward’s method107
  • Wikipedia 159–164, 176–178
    • NPOV policy173
    • reliable sources 173, 175
    • Wikipedia article 159–161, 175–177
    • Wikipedia contributors160
    • Wikipedia discussion page159
    • Wikipedia editors159
    • Wikipedia policy 163, 173, 175
    • Wikipedia talk page (TP) 159–163, 174, 177–178
    • Wikipedians 159, 161–163, 177

Y

  • YouTube 229, 242, 246