Cover not available
Part of
The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres
Edited by Anita Fetzer and Elda Weizman
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 307] 2019
► pp. 73–101

Quoting ordinary people in Prime Minister’s Questions

| University of Augsburg, Germany
| Universities of York and Salford, UK
Prime Minister’s Questions is the central British parliamentary institution. Every week Members of Parliament have the opportunity to pose questions to the Prime Minister, frequently utilising quotations from various sources, e.g. allies from the quoter’s political party, political opponents, experts, or ordinary people. The focus of this contribution is on the strategic use of quotations from ordinary people in the interchanges between the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition. The data comprise 240 question-response sequences. In the sequences analysed, quotations make up 9% of the total word count for Cameron-Miliband and 10% for Cameron-Corbyn: 2% of the quotations are sourced by ordinary people in the Cameron-Miliband data, and 31% in the Cameron-Corbyn data. Corbyn’s systematic use of quotations from ordinary people was novel, foregrounding their political issues and assigning them the status of an object of discourse in the media thus making the government accountable to them.
Keywords: accountability, elite political discourse, follow-up, metadata, non-elite political discourse, ordinariness, private-public interface, quotation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Quotation
    • 2.1Linguistic formatting
    • 2.2Discursive functions
  • 3.Ordinary people and ordinariness
  • 4.The representation of ordinary people and ordinary-life experience by non-ordinary politicians
    • 4.1Method
      • 4.1.1Participants
      • 4.1.2Apparatus
      • 4.1.3Procedure
    • 4.2Results
    • 4.3Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 12 December 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.307.04ani
References (24)
References
Antaki, Charles and Ivan Leudar. 2001. “Recruiting the Record: Using Opponents' Exact Words in Parliamentary Argumentation.” Text 21(4): 467–488.Google Scholar
Brendel, Elke, Jörg Meibauer and Markus Steinbach. 2011. “Exploring the Meaning of Quotation.” In Understanding Quotation, ed. by Elke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer and Markus Steinbach, 1–33. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle and Ingrid Van Alphen. 2012. “Introductory Remarks on New and Old Quotatives.” In Quotatives. Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Isabelle Buchstaller and Ingrid Van Alphen, xi–xxx, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven. 1995. “Defining Moments, Presidential Debates, and the Dynamics of Quotability.” Journal of Communication 45(3): 118–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2013. “The Multilayered and Multifaceted Nature of Political Discourse.” The Pragmatics of Political Discourse. Explorations across Cultures, ed. by Anita Fetzer, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “‘When you came into office you said that your government would be different’: Forms and Functions of Quotations in Mediated Political Discourse.” In The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence N. Berlin, 245–273. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Elisabeth Reber. 2015. “Quoting in Political Discourse: Professional Talk Meets Ordinary Postings. In The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, ed. by Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 97–124. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Elda Weizman. 2018. “‘What I would say to John and everyone like John is …’: The Construction of Ordinariness Through Quotations in Mediated Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 29(5): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greatbatch, David 1988. “A Turn-Taking System for British News Interviews.” Language in Society 17: 401–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1992. “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2003. “Discourse and Metadiscourse in Parliamentary Debates.” Journal of Language and Politics 2(1): 71–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
May, Thomas Erskine. 2004. Parliamentary Practice. London: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
Oishi, Etsuko and Anita Fetzer. 2016. “Expositives in Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 96: 49–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. “On Doing ‘Being Ordinary’”. In Structures of Social Action, ed. by Max Atkinson and John Heritage, 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schäffner, Christina and Susan Bassnett (eds.). 2010. Political Discourse, Media and Translation. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars PublishingGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 1993. Elite Discourse and Racism. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, David. 2011. Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now that the Facts aren’t the Facts, Experts are Everywhere, and the Smartest person in the Room is the Room. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda and Anita Fetzer (eds.). 2015. Follow-Ups in Political Discourse: Explorations across Contexts and Discourse Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda. 2011. “Conveying Indirect Reservations Through Discursive Redundancy.” Language Sciences 33(2): 295–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2011. The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Fetzer, Anita
2022. Small stories and accountability of discursive action in mediated political discourse: Contextualisation and recontextualisation of ordinary and not-so-ordinary participants. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2024.  Being sensible is now a radical concept I LOVE that quote haha . Internet Pragmatics DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita & Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka
2021. Argumentative, Political and Legal Discourse. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 520 ff. DOI logo
Bull, Peter
2020. Meeting the media as a political psychologist. History & Philosophy of Psychology 21:1 ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Bull, Peter, Anita Fetzer & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. Calling Mr Speaker ‘Mr Speaker’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Reber, Elisabeth
2020. Visuo-material performances. AILA Review 33 ► pp. 176 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.