Chapter published in:
The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres
Edited by Anita Fetzer and Elda Weizman
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 307] 2019
► pp. 73–101

Quoting ordinary people in Prime Minister’s Questions

| University of Augsburg, Germany
| Universities of York and Salford, UK
Prime Minister’s Questions is the central British parliamentary institution. Every week Members of Parliament have the opportunity to pose questions to the Prime Minister, frequently utilising quotations from various sources, e.g. allies from the quoter’s political party, political opponents, experts, or ordinary people. The focus of this contribution is on the strategic use of quotations from ordinary people in the interchanges between the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition. The data comprise 240 question-response sequences. In the sequences analysed, quotations make up 9% of the total word count for Cameron-Miliband and 10% for Cameron-Corbyn: 2% of the quotations are sourced by ordinary people in the Cameron-Miliband data, and 31% in the Cameron-Corbyn data. Corbyn’s systematic use of quotations from ordinary people was novel, foregrounding their political issues and assigning them the status of an object of discourse in the media thus making the government accountable to them.
Keywords: accountability, elite political discourse, follow-up, metadata, non-elite political discourse, ordinariness, private-public interface, quotation
Published online: 12 December 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.307.04ani
References

References

Antaki, Charles and Ivan Leudar
2001 “Recruiting the Record: Using Opponents' Exact Words in Parliamentary Argumentation.” Text 21(4): 467–488.Google Scholar
Brendel, Elke, Jörg Meibauer and Markus Steinbach
2011 “Exploring the Meaning of Quotation.” In Understanding Quotation, ed. by Elke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer and Markus Steinbach, 1–33. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle and Ingrid Van Alphen
2012 “Introductory Remarks on New and Old Quotatives.” In Quotatives. Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Isabelle Buchstaller and Ingrid Van Alphen, xi–xxx, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven
1995 “Defining Moments, Presidential Debates, and the Dynamics of Quotability.” Journal of Communication 45(3): 118–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2013 “The Multilayered and Multifaceted Nature of Political Discourse.” The Pragmatics of Political Discourse. Explorations across Cultures, ed. by Anita Fetzer, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “ ‘When you came into office you said that your government would be different’: Forms and Functions of Quotations in Mediated Political Discourse.” In The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence N. Berlin, 245–273. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Elisabeth Reber
2015 “Quoting in Political Discourse: Professional Talk Meets Ordinary Postings. In The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, ed. by Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 97–124. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Elda Weizman
2018 “ ‘What I would say to John and everyone like John is …’: The Construction of Ordinariness Through Quotations in Mediated Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 29(5): 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greatbatch, David
1988 “A Turn-Taking System for British News Interviews.” Language in Society 17: 401–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1992 “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia 2003 “Discourse and Metadiscourse in Parliamentary Debates.” Journal of Language and Politics 2(1): 71–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
May, Thomas Erskine
2004 Parliamentary Practice. London: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
Oishi, Etsuko and Anita Fetzer
2016 “Expositives in Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 96: 49–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1984 “On Doing ‘Being Ordinary’”. In Structures of Social Action, ed. by Max Atkinson and John Heritage, 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schäffner, Christina and Susan Bassnett
(eds.) 2010 Political Discourse, Media and Translation. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars PublishingGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969 Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun
1993 Elite Discourse and Racism. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, David
2011 Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now that the Facts aren’t the Facts, Experts are Everywhere, and the Smartest person in the Room is the Room. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda and Anita Fetzer
(eds.) 2015 Follow-Ups in Political Discourse: Explorations across Contexts and Discourse Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda
2011 “Conveying Indirect Reservations Through Discursive Redundancy.” Language Sciences 33(2): 295–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2011 The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Bull, Peter, Anita Fetzer & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. Calling Mr Speaker ‘Mr Speaker’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 64 ff. Crossref logo
Reber, Elisabeth
2020. Visuo-material performances. AILA Review 33 ► pp. 176 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.