Cover not available
Part of
The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres
Edited by Anita Fetzer and Elda Weizman
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 307] 2019
► pp. 157–178

Ordinary science

 | University College London, UK
Science journalism entails an orientation to the interests and understandings of ordinary audiences. The key challenge for journalists is to present the research reported as newsworthy and translate complex findings to understandable terms. This study examines interviews with scientific experts conducted in the Israeli current affairs program London et. Kirschenbaum, focusing on discursive strategies used by presenters to align with the interests and knowledge of their audiences. The doing of “being ordinary” emerges as a key resource for allocating the translation of scientific knowledge between expert guests and the presenters themselves. In doing so, they are shown to shift between knowers or ignorants of the topic reported in a way that reflects their public personae and their task of making science accessible and relevant. Doing ordinariness appears to involve translational, epistemic and biographic dimensions that resonate with the interactional but also broader contexts in which reporting takes place.
Keywords: Ordinariness, Science Communication, News Interviews, Conversation Analysis, Epistemics, Biography
Article outline
  • 1.Science and the public
  • 2.Ordinariness and popular television
  • 3.London et Kirschenbaum
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Knowledge and ignorance
    • 4.2Science and common-sense
    • 4.3Research and us
  • 5.Life and presentation
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 12 December 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.307.07arm
References (62)
References
Albaek, Erik. 2011. “The Interaction Between Experts and Journalists in News Journalism.” Journalism 12 (3):335–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armon, Rony. 2017a. “Interactional Alarms: Experts’ Framing of Health Risks in Live Broadcast News Interviews.” Health Communication: 1–10.Google Scholar
. 2017b. “Radio Sensors and Electric Storms: Scientific Metaphors in Media Talks.” Science Communication 39 (4):443–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armon, Rony, and Ayelet Baram-Tsabari. 2016. “Our Findings, My Method: Framing Science in Televised Interviews.” Public Understanding of Science 26 (8):986–1002. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armon, Rony, Yael Barel Ben-David, and Ayelet Baram-Tsabari. 2017. “Ribosomes as Current Affairs: The science of London and Kirschenbaum (Hebrew).” Media Frames 16:85–108.Google Scholar
Armon, Rony, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou. 2017. “Popularization in Action: Small Stories of Scientific Expertise.” Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies Paper 216Google Scholar
Bailey, Simon. 2013. Exploring ADHD: An Ethnography of Disorder in Early Childhood. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet, and Bruce V. Lewenstein. 2017. “Preparing Scientists to Be Science Communicators.” In Preparing Informal Science Educators: Perspectives from Science Communication and Education, ed. byPatricia G. Patrick, 437–471. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barel, Yael, Ayelet Baram-Tsabari, Ran Peleg, Rony Armon, and Ayelet Raveh. 2015. Towards evidence based science communication policy in Israel: Science coverage in the Israeli news media (October 2013–April 2014). Haifa: Samuel Neeman Institute for National Policy Research.Google Scholar
Besley, John C, and Matthew C Nisbet. 2013. “How Scientists View the Public, the Media and the Political Process.” Public Understanding of Science 22 (6):644–659. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolden, Galina B. 2013. “Unpacking “Self”: Repair and Epistemics in Conversation.” Social Psychology Quarterly 76 (4):314–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonner, Frances. 2003. Ordinary Television: Analyzing Popular TV: London: Sage.Google Scholar
Carranza, Isolda E. 2015 “Narrating and Arguing: From Plausibility to Local Moves.” In Handbook of Narrative Analysis, ed. byAnna De Fina and Alexandra Georgakopoulou, 57–75. Wiley: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Andrew. 2013. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power: Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claessens, Michel. 2008. “European Trends in Scienced Communication.” In Communicating science in social contexts: new models, new practices, ed. byD Cheng, M Claessens, T Gascoigne, J Metcalfe, B Schiele and S Shunke, 27–38. Dordrecht, NL: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E, and John Heritage. 2002. The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clegg Smith, Katherine, Rachel Friedman Singer, and Elizabeth Edsall Kromm. 2010. “Getting Cancer Research Into the News: A Communication Case Study Centered on One U.S. Comprehensive Cancer Center.” Science Communication 32 (2):202–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dori-Hacohen, Gonen. 2014. “Establishing Social Groups in Hebrew: ‘We’ in Political Radio Phone-In Programs.” In Constructing Collectivity: ‘We’ across languages and contexts, ed. byTheodossia-Soula Pavlidou, 187–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunwoody, Sharon, Dominique Brossard, and Anthony Dudo. 2009. “Socialization or Rewards? Predicting U.S. Scientist-Media Interactions.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 86 (2):299–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekström, Mats, and Marianna Patrona, eds. 2011. Talking Politics in Broadcast Media: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Political Interviewing, Journalism and Accountability. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Peter Bull. 2013. “Political Interviews in Context.” In Analyzing Genres in Political Communication, ed. by Urszula Okulska and Urszula Okulska, 73–99. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, and Elda Weizman. 2017. “The Construction of Ordinariness in Mediated Public Talk: Accountability of Communicative Action and the Private-Public Interface.” International Pragmatics Association Conference Belfast, July 2017.
Fitzgerald, Richard, and Susan McKay. 2012. “Just Like Home: Remediation of the Social in Contemporary News Broadcasting.” Discourse, Context & Media 1 (1):1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furedi, Frank. 2004. Therapy Culture: Cultivating Vulnerability in an Uncertain Age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gamson, Joshua. 1998. Freaks Talk Back: Tabloid Talk Shows and Sexual Nonconformity: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou A. 2007. Small Stories, Interaction and Identities, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hamo, Michal. 2015. “I have Nothing to Do but Agree: Affiliative Meta-Discursive Follow-Ups as a Resource for the Reciprocal Positioning of Journalists, Experts and Politicians-As-Experts in Television News.” In Follow-ups in Political Discourse: Explorations across contexts and discourse domains, ed. by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer, 57–80. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haran, Joan, Jenny Kitzinger, Maureen McNeil, and Kate O’Riordan. 2008. Human Cloning in the Media: From Science Fiction to Science Practice. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2012. “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45:30–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horton-Salway, Mary. 2011. “Repertoires of ADHD in UK Newspaper Media.” Health 15 (5):533–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. 2006. Media Talk: Conversation Analysis and the Study of Broadcasting. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Illouz, Eva. 2003. Oprah Winfrey and the Glamour of Misery: An Essay on Popular Culture: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kampf, Zohar, and Efrat Daskal. 2011. “When the Watchdog Bites: Insulting Politicians on Air.” In Talking Politics in the Broadcast Media, edited by Mats Ekström and Marianna Patrona, 177–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kapon, Shulamit, Uri Ganiel, and Bat Eylon. 2010. “Goals and Design of Public Physics Lectures: Perspectives of High-School Students, Physics Teachers and Lecturers.” Physics education 44 (5):528–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leane, Elizabeth. 2007. Reading Popular Physics: Disciplinary Skirmishes and Textual Strategies. Bodmin: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Livingstone SM and Lunt, P. (1994) Talk on Television: Audience Participation and Public Debate. London, UK: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
London, Yaron. 2014. If I Were a Pirate (Hebrew). Jerusalem: Keter.Google Scholar
Lunt, Peter. 2008. “Little Angels: The Mediation of Parenting.” Continuum 22 (4):537–546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNair, B, M Hibberd, and P Schlesinger. 2003. Mediated Access: Broadcasting and Democratic Participation in the Age of Mediated Politics. books folder vols. Luton: University of Luton Press.Google Scholar
Mellor, Felicity. 2012. “Is the ‘Cox Effect’ Good for Us?” Physics World 25 (10):19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, Martin. 2007. Discourse of Broadcast News: A Linguistic Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2008. “The Discourse of the Broadcast News Interview: A Typology.” Journalism Studies 9 (2):260–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, Matthew C, and Chris Mooney. 2007. “Framing Science.” Science 316 (5821):56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olson, Randy. 2015. Houston, We Have a Narrative: Why Science Needs Story. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Persico, Oren. 2005. “The Iron Curtain (Hebrew).” Globes, 29/05/2005. [URL].Google Scholar
Peters, Hans Peter. 2013. “Gap Between Science and Media Revisited: Scientists as Public Communicators.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (Supplement 3):14102–14109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, Hans Peter, D. Brossard, S. De Cheveigné, S. Dunwoody, M. Kallfass, S. Miller, and S. Tsuchida. 2008. “Science Communication: Interactions with the Mass Media.” Science 321 (5886):204–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quail, Christine M, Kathalene A Razzano, and Loubna H Skalli. 2005. Vulture Culture: The Politics and Pedagogy of Daytime Television Talk Shows. Vol. 152: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 2007.”Linguistic Ethnography and the Study of Identities.” Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies. Paper 43.Google Scholar
Reich, Zvi. 2012. “Journalism as Bipolar Interactional Expertise.” Communication Theory 22 (4):339–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rödder, Simone, and Mike S. Schäfer. 2010. “Repercussion and Resistance: An Empirical Study on the Interrelation Between Science and Mass Media.” Communications 35:249–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Giora. 2006. Ombudsman: The 11th Annual Report (Hebrew). Jerusalem: The Second Television & Radio Authority.
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. “On Doing “Being Ordinary” “ In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversational Analysis, ed. by J. M Atkinson and J Heritage, 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Shattuc, Jane M. 2014. The Talking Cure: TV Talk Shows and Women: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, A. 2007. “Lay and Expert Voices in Public Participation Programmes: A Case of Generic Heterogeneity.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (8):1420–1435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornborrow, Joanna. 2015. The Discourse of Public Participation Media: From Talk Show to Twitter. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tolson, Andrew. 2006. Media Talk: Spoken Discourse on TV and Radio. Edinburgh Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Tsfati, Yariv, Jonathan Cohen, and Albert C. Gunther. 2011. “The Influence of Presumed Media Influence on News About Science and Scientists.” Science Communication 33:143–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Eperen, L., F. M. Marincola, and J. Strohm. 2010. “Bridging the Divide Between Science and Journalism.” Journal of Translational Medicine 8:25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, Piet. 2010. “Sound-Bite Science: On the Brevity of Science and Scientific Experts in Western European Television News.” Science Communication 32 (3):330–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda. 2008. Positioning in Media Dialogue: Negotiating Roles in the News Interview. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Weizman, Elda & Anita Fetzer
2021. The discursive construction of accountability for communicative action to citizens: A contrastive analysis across Israeli and British media discourse. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:5 ► pp. 605 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.