Part of
Science Communication on the Internet: Old genres meet new genres
Edited by María José Luzón and Carmen Pérez-Llantada
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 308] 2019
► pp. 118
Aalbersberg, IJsbrand Jan, Frans Heeman, Hylke Koers, and Elena Zudilova-Seinstra
2012 “Elsevier’s Article of the Future Enhancing the User Experience and Integrating Data through Applications.” Insights: the UKSG Journal 25 (1): 33–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aalbersberg, IJsbrand Jan, Judson Dunham, and Hylke Koers
2013 “Connecting Scientific Articles with Research Data: New Directions in Online Scholarly Publishing.” Data Science Journal 12: 235–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Askehave, Inger, and Anne E. Nielsen
2005 “Digital Genres: A Challenge to Traditional Genre Theory.” Information Technology & People 18 (2): 120–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ball, David
2016The Impact of Open Science. Last accessed June 15, 2019. [URL]
Bardi, Alessia, and Paolo Manghi
2014 “Enhanced Publications: Data Models and Information Systems.” LIBER Quarterly 23 (4): 240–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateman, John A.
2008Multimodality and Genre. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bawarshi, Anis S., and Mary Jo Reiff
2010Genre: An Introduction to History, Theory, Research and Pedagogy. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Charles
1994 “Systems of Genres and the Enactment of Social Intentions.” In Genre and the New Rhetoric, ed. by Aviva Freedman, and Peter Medway, 79–101. Bristol, Pa: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
1997 “The Life of Genre, the Life in the Classroom.” In Genre and Writing, ed. by Wendy Bishop, and Hans Ostrum, 19–26. Portsmouth: NH Boynton/Cook.Google Scholar
Bernad-Mechó, Edgar
2015 “A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Linking Metadiscursive Elements in Two OpenCourseWare Lectures (MOOCs).” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 212: 61–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berkenkotter, Carol, and Thomas N. Huckin
1995Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K.
1993Analysing Genre — Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2004Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad
2009Register, Genre, and Style, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Bethany Gray
2012 “The Competing Demands of Popularization vs. Economy: Written Language in the Age of Mass Literacy.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen, and Elisabeth C. Traugott, 314–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bolter, Jay D., and Richard Grusin
1999Remediation – Understanding New Media. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bondi, Marina
2018 “Blogs as Interwoven Polylogues: The Dialogic Action Game.” Language and Dialogue 8: 43–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boulton, Geoffrey
2012Science as an Open Enterprise, UK: The Royal Society. Last accessed June 15, 2019. [URL]
Breeze, Ruth
2016 “Tracing the Development of an Emergent Part-Genre: The Author Summary.” English for Specific Purposes 42: 50–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breure, Leen, Hans Voorbij, Maarten Hoogerwerf
2011 “Rich Internet Publications: ‘Show What You Tell’.” Journal of Digital Information 12 (1). Last accessed June 15, 2019. [URL]
Buehl, Jonathan
2016 “Revolution or Evolution? Casing the Impact of Digital Media on the Rhetoric of Science.” In Science and the Internet: Communicating Knowledge in a Digital Age, ed. by Alan Gross, and Jonathan Buehl, 1–10. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.Google Scholar
Carter-Thomas, Shirley, and Elizabeth Rowley-Jolivet
2016 “Open Science Notebooks: New Insights, New affordances.” Journal of Pragmatics 116: 64–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casper, Christian
2016 “The Online Research Article and the Ecological Basis of New Digital Genres.” In Science and the Internet: Communicating Knowledge in a Digital Age, ed. by Alan Gross, and Jonathan Buehl, 77–98. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crawford Camiciottoli, Belinda
2018 “OpenCourseWare Lectures: A New Genre for Knowledge Dissemination?.” Paper presented at the CERLIS Conference 2018, Bergamo, Italy, June 21–23, 2018.
Crowston, Kevin, and Marie Williams
2000 “Reproduced and Emergent Genres of Communication on the World Wide Web.” The Information Society 16 (3): 201–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowston, Kevin and Barbara Kwasnik
2004 “A Framework for Creating a Facetted Classification for Genres: Addressing Issues of Multidimensionality.” Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–9. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press.Google Scholar
Delfanti, Alessandro
2015 “Preprints and Peer Review: A Lesson from Physics.” Journal of Science Communication. 14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devitt, Amy J.
2004Writing Genres. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
2018About the Audioslides. Last accessed June 15, 2019. [URL]
Engberg, Jan, and Carmen D. Maier
2015 “Exploring the Hypermodal Communication of Academic Knowledge beyond Generic Structure.” In Discourse In and Through the Media: Recontextualizing and Reconceptualizing Expert Discourse, ed. by Marina Bondi, Silvia Cacchiani, and Davide Mazzi, 46–62. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Erviti, Mari Carmen, and Erik Stengler
2016 “Online Science Videos: An Exploratory Study with Major Professional Content Providers in the United Kingdom.” Journal of Science Communication 15 (6). A06. [URL]
Gross, Alan, and Jonathan Buehl
(eds.) 2016Science and the Internet: Communicating Knowledge in a Digital Age. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heyd, Theresa
2016 “Digital Genres and Processes of Remediation.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 87–102. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2011 “The Presentation of Self in Scholarly Life: Identity and Marginalization in Academic Homepages.” English for Specific Purposes 30 (4): 286–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Sarah, and Joanna Radin
2011 “Bounding an Emerging Technology: Para-scientific Media and the Drexler-Smalley Debate about Nanotechnology.” Social Studies of Science 41 (4): 457–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Ashley R., and Carolyn R. Miller
2016 “Intersections: Scientific and Parascientific Communication on the Internet.” In Science and the Internet: Communicating Knowledge in a Digital Age, ed. by Alan Gross, and Jonathan Buehl, 221–245. Amityville, NY: Baywood.Google Scholar
Kjellberg, Sara
2009 “Scholarly Blogging Practice as Situated Genre: An Analytical Framework Based on Genre Theory.” Information Research 14 (3). [URL]
Kuehne, Lauren, and Julian Olden
2015 “Lay Summaries Needed to Enhance Science Communication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States 112 (12): 3585–3586. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorés, Rosa
2018 “Digital Spaces of Knowledge Dissemination and Visibility: Promotional Discourse in European Research Projects Websites.” Paper presented at the CERLIS Conference 2018, Bergamo, Italy, June 21–23, 2018.
Luzón, María-José
2013 “Public Communication of Science in Blogs: Recontextualizing Scientific Discourse for a Diversified Audience.” Written Communication 30 (4): 428–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Connecting Genres and Languages in Online Scholarly Communication: An Analysis of Research Group Blogs.” Written Communication 34 (4): 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Engaging with Multiple Audiences in Research Group Websites: The Interplay between Genres and Languages.” Paper presented at the 36th International Conference of the Spanish Society for Applied Linguistics, Cádiz, Spain, April 19–21, 2018.
2019 “Bridging the Gap between Experts and Publics: The Role of Multimodality in Disseminating Research in Online Videos.” Ibérica, Journal of the European Association of Languages for Specific Purposes 37(1): 167–192.Google Scholar
Mahrt, Merja, and Cornelius Puschmann
2014 “Science Blogging: An Exploratory Study of Motives, Styles, and Audience Reactions.” Journal of Science Communication 13 (3): A05.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marwick, Alice, and Danah Boyd
2011 “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media & Society 13: 114–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehlenbacher, Ashley R.
2017 “Crowdfunding Science: Exigencies and Strategies in an Emerging Genre of Science Communication.” Technical Communication Quarterly 26 (2): 127–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Carolyn R.
1984 “Genre as Social Action.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Carolyn R., and Dawn Shepherd
2009 “Questions for Genre Theory from the Blogosphere.” In Genres in the Internet: Issues in the Theory of Genre, ed. by Janet Giltrow, and Dieter Stein, 263–290. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Carolyn R., and Jeanne Fahnestock
2013 “Genres in Scientific and Technical Rhetoric.” Poroi 9 (1): 12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Michael
2011An Informal Definition of Open Science. The OpenScience Project. Last accessed June 15, 2019. [URL]
Orlikowski, Wanda, and JoAnne Yates
1994 “Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 39 (4): 541–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paltridge, Brian
1995 “Working with Genre: A Pragmatic Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 24 (4), 393–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen
2013 “The Article of the Future: Strategies for Genre Stability and Change.” English for Specific Purposes 32 (4): 221–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “How is the digital medium shaping research genres? Some cross-disciplinary trends.” ESP Today 4: 22–42.Google Scholar
Plastina, Anna F.
2017 “Professional Discourse in Video Abstracts: Re-articulating the Meaning of Written Research Article Abstracts.” In Specialised and Professional Discourse across Media and Genres, ed. by Giuliana Garzone, Paola Catenaccio, Kim Grego, and Roxanne Doerr, 57–74. Milano: Ledizioni.Google Scholar
Prior, Paul
2009 “From Speech Genres to Mediated Multimodal Genre Systems: Bakhtin, Voloshinov, and the Question of Writing.” In Genre in a Changing World, ed. by Charles Bazerman, Adair Bonini, and Debora Figueiredo, 17–34. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse; West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
Riboni, Giorgia
2018 “Vlogging Science: Scholarly Vlogs as a New Knowledge Dissemination Genre.” Paper presented at the CERLIS Conference 2018, Bergamo, Italy, June 21–23, 2018.
Ross-Hellauer, Tony
2017 “What is Open Peer Review? A Systematic Review.” F1000 Research 6: 588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz-Madrid, Noelia, and Inmaculada Fortanet-Gómez
2017 “An Analysis of Multimodal Interaction in a Webinar: Defining the Genre.” EPIC Series in Language and Linguistics 2: 274–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidler, Michelle
2016 “The Chemistry Liveblogging Event: The Web Refigures Peer Review.” In Science and the Internet: Communicating Knowledge in a Digital Age, ed. by Alan G. Gross, and Jonathan Buehl, 99–116. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smart, Graham
2016 “Discourse Coalitions, Science Blogs, and the Public Debate on Global Climate Change.” In Genre and the Performance of Publics, ed. by Anis S. Bawarshi, and Mary Jo Reiff, 157–177. Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Alison
2015 “ ‘Wow, I Didn’t Know that Before; Thank You’: How Scientists Use Twitter for Public Engagement.” Journal of Promotional Communications 3 (3): 320–339.Google Scholar
Spicer, Scott
2014 “Exploring Video Abstracts in Science Journals: An Overview and Case Study.” Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 2 (2): eP1110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spinuzzi, Clay
2004 “Describing Assemblages: Genre Sets, Systems, Repertoires, and Ecologies.” Computer Writing and Research Lab. White Paper Series. [Online]. Last accessed June 15, 2019. [URL]
Swales, John M.
1990Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2004Research Genres. Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trench, Brian
2008 “Internet: Turning Science Communication Inside-out?” In Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, ed. by Massimiano Bucchi, and Bruce Lewenstein, 143–186. London, U.K.: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wickman, Chad
2016 “Learning to “Share your Science”: The Open Notebook as Textual Object and Dynamic Rhetorical Space.” In Science and the Internet: Communicating Knowledge in a Digital Age, ed. by Alan G. Gross, and Jonathan Buehl, 11–22. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yeo, Sara K., Xuan Liang, Dominique Brossard, Kathleen M. Rose, Kaine Korzekwa, Dietram A. Scheufele, and Michael A. Xenos
2017 “The Case of #arseniclife: Blogs and Twitter in Informal Peer Review.” Public Understanding of Science 26 (8): 937–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Wenhsien
2017 “Audioslide Presentations as an Appendant Genre – Key Words, Personal Pronouns, Stance and Engagement.” ESP Today 5 (1): 24–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Beltrán-Palanques, Vicent
2023. Three-Minute Thesis Presentations: Engaging the Audience Through Multimodal Resources. In Digital Scientific Communication,  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Freddi, Maria
Lorés, Rosa & Giuliana Diani
2021. Disseminating knowledge: the effects of digitalised academic discourse on language, genre and identity. European Journal of English Studies 25:3  pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Tereszkiewicz, Anna
2023. Engagement strategies on medical YouTube channels. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 140:2  pp. 139 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.