Cover not available
Part of
Manners, Norms and Transgressions in the History of English: Literary and linguistic approaches
Edited by Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 312] 2020
► pp. 247–269

“Collect a thousand loyalty points and you get a free coffin”

Creative impoliteness in the TV comedy drama Doc Martin

| University of Cagliari

The British comedy drama Doc Martin is set in the fictional fishing village of Portwenn in Cornwall, where the community’s only medical practitioner, Dr Martin Ellingham, is known to be brilliant as regards the clinical aspects of his profession but totally devoid of even the most basic interpersonal skills. He is habitually gruff, ill-tempered and extremely rude to patients, and indeed to the entire population of Portwenn.

This paper draws upon Brown and Levinson’s (1987) pioneering study of face-threatening acts and politeness, but also Spencer-Oatey’s more recent work (2007, 2008) on quality face, social identity face and relational face. The concept of creative impoliteness owes much to Culpeper’s view (1996, 2005, 2011) of impoliteness as a phenomenon related to situated behaviours that conflict with interlocutors’ expectations, wishes and notions of what ought to be said or done during interaction. The aim is to demonstrate how Dr Ellingham’s rudeness does not consist of unoriginal insults or standard terms of offence – if it did, viewers would quickly switch off – but involves highly creative use of language and thus serves as the main source of humour in the TV series. In Doc Martin imaginative script writers and a skilled actor create a character who in real life would be insupportable, but on the TV screen is a comic monster.

Keywords: entertaining impoliteness, implicational impoliteness, asymmetrical power relationships, intentionality, quality face, social identity face, relational face, conversational implicature
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Asymmetrical power relationships in doctor-patient interaction
  • 3.Towards an understanding of impoliteness and its comic potential
  • 4.Analysis of extracts from Series 1 to 7
    • 4.1Series 1 (2004): Starting off on the wrong foot
    • 4.2Series 2 (2005): People coming back
    • 4.3Series 3 (2007): The course of true love never did run smooth
    • 4.4Series 4 (2009): Blood’s no problem
    • 4.5Series 5 (2011): Leaving Portwenn, or maybe not
    • 4.6Series 7 (2015): Anglo-American relations
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Note
  • Data
  • References
Published online: 11 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.312.11buc
References (18)

Data

Doc Martin Series 1–8
DVD Box Set 2017 Acorn Media UK, ASIN: B075J4G6T9.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Patrick S., and Barrie E. L. Long
1976 Doctors Talking to Patients: A Study of the Verbal Behaviour of General Practitioners Consulting in Their Surgeries. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show The Weakest Link .” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1: 35–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Impoliteness: Questions and Answers.” In Aspects of Linguistic Impoliteness, ed. by Denis Jamet, and Manuel Jobert, 2–15. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
2001 Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Harvey, Kevin, and Nelya Koteyko
2013 Exploring Health Communication: Language in Action. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hughes, Geoffrey
1998 Swearing: A Social History of Foul Language, Oaths and Profanity in English. London: Penguin Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Jobert, Manuel
2013 “Domestic and Professional Impoliteness in Fawlty Towers: Impoliteness as a Dramatic Device.” In Aspects of Linguistic Impoliteness, ed. by Denis Jamet, and Manuel Jobert, 75–93. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N.
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pillière, Linda
2013 “Dr. House and the Language of Offence.” In Aspects of Linguistic Impoliteness, ed. by Denis Jamet, and Manuel Jobert, 60–74. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. M.
2000 “Rapport Management: A Framework for Analysis.” In Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures, ed. by Spencer-Oatey, 11–46. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2002 “Managing Rapport in Talk: Using Rapport Sensitive Incidents to Explore the Motivational Concerns Underlying the Management of Relations.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (5): 529–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (4): 639–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2008 Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charlotte
2016 “Mock Politeness and Culture: Perceptions and Practice in UK and Italian Data.” Intercultural Pragmatics 13 (4): 463–98.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by 1 other publications

Li, Ying & Wari Wongwaropakorn
2024. Analyzing politeness and refusal speech acts in popular Chinese television drama series. Cogent Arts & Humanities 11:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.