Cover not available
Part of
Bonding through Context: Language and interactional alignment in Japanese situated discourse
Edited by Risako Ide and Kaori Hata
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 314] 2020
► pp. 61–82

Chapter 3
The discursive construction of husband and wife bonding

Analyzing benefactives in childrearing narratives

| University of Tsukuba
| Japan Women's University
In this chapter, we analyze Japanese women’s narratives about their child-rearing experiences to reveal the meta-level of positioning of their husbands’ involvement through examining the use and non-use of benefactive verb forms. We pose the grammatical form of benefactive, especially the -te kureru form, as a center of meaning making wherein the ideologies of husband and wife bonding are negotiated and enacted in the situated context of interviews. Analyzing the narratives of women in three different groups (i.e., housewives, dual-income working women, and farmer women) in Japan, we demonstrate how the use and the non-use of -te kureru benefactive differently indexes husband and wife bonding in childrearing, while reflecting and reproducing contrasting ideologies regarding gender relations within the family.
Keywords: interview narratives, benefactives, -te kureru , -te morau , gender ideology, indexicality
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical backgrounds
    • 2.1Grammatical usage of benefit expressions
    • 2.2The ideological usage of -te kureru
    • 2.3The changing Japanese family and gender norms
  • 3.Data and results
  • 4.Analysis: Husband and wife bonding in childrearing narratives
    • 4.1The use of -te kureru among the housewife group
    • 4.2The non-usage of -te kureru and use of -te morau among the dual-income group
    • 4.3The non-usage of -te kureru among the farmer group
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 3 December 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.314.03ide
References (39)
References
Bauman, Richard, and Charles Briggs. 1990. “Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology Vol. 19: 59–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Befu, Harumi. 1968. “Gift-Giving in a Modernizing Japan,” Monumenta Nipponica Vol. 23, No.3/4: 445–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2001. “Language, Gender, and Power: An Anthropological Review.” In Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, ed. by A. Duranti, Malden, 420–430. MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Harada, Tomi. 2007. “Nihongo kaiwa ni okeru ‘juju hyougen’ no shiyo jittai to poraitonesu sutorategii [Actual use of donatory verbs in Japanese conversations and politeness strategies].” Gengo to Bunka [Language and Culture] 11: 117–138.Google Scholar
Hata, Kaori, Takako Okamoto, and Risako Ide. 2017. Shussan Kosodate no Narrative Bunseki [Narrative Analysis of Childbirth and Child-rearing]. Osaka: Osaka University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane. 1995. “The Voices of Don Gabriel: Responsibility and Self in a Modern Mexicano Narrative.” In The Dialogic Emergence of Culture, ed. by Dennis Tedlock and Bruce Mannheim, 97–147. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Finding Culture in Narrative.” In Finding Culture in Talk: A Collection of Methods, ed. by N. Quinn, 157–202. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holstein, A. James and Jaber, F. Guburium. 1995. The Active Interview. London: Sage Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ide, Risako and Yong-chol, Yim. (2001). “Hito to hito to o tsunagu Mono: naze nihongo ni juju doushi ga ooinoka [What connects people to people: The reason why Japanese has many give and receive verbs].” Gengo [Language] 30(5): 42–45.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko. 2006. Wakimae no Goyoron [The Pragmatics of Wakimae]. Tokyo: Taishuukan.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jolivet, Muriel. 1997. Japan: The Childless Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge and London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lebra, S. Takie and William, P. Lebra eds. 1986. Japanese Culture and Behavior. Revised edition. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Makino, Seiichi. 1996. Uchi to Soto no Gengo Bunkagaku [Language and Cultural Studies on Uchi and Soto]. Tokyo: ALC.Google Scholar
Masuoka, Takashi. 2001. “Nihongo ni okeru juju doushi to onkeisei [On the Japanese give and take verbs and its indebtedness].” Gengo [Language] 30(5): 26–32.Google Scholar
Maynard, K. Senko. 2009. Teiuka, Yappari, Nihongo Dayone [Well, It’s Japanese Afterall]. Tokyo: Taishuukan Shoten.Google Scholar
Nakatani, Ayumi. 2006. “The Emergence of ‘Nurturing Fathers’: Discourses and Practices of Fatherhood in Contemporary Japan.” In The Changing Japanese Family, eds. by R. Marcus and A. Takenaka, 94–108. Oxon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ochiai, Emiko. 1996. The Japanese Family System in Transition: A Sociological Analysis of Family Change in Postwar Japan. Tokyo: LTCB International Library Foundation.Google Scholar
OECD. 2017. “The Pursuit of Gender Equality: An Uphill Battle.” [URL] (Feb. 28, 2019) DOI logo
Okamoto, Takako. 2008. “An Investigation of the Supportive Giving/Receiving Verbs (SGR Verbs) tekureru/temorau in the Narratives of Japanese Women who Experienced Childbirth and Childcare.” Studies in English and American Literature 43: 79–101, Japan Women’s University.Google Scholar
. 2017. “Amarazu tarazu kosannin: Tochigi kenoubu nouson deno choosa kara [Three children are just right: An investigation of a farming community in middle Tochigi].” In Shussan Kosodate no Narrative Bunseki. [Narrative Analysis of Childbirth and Child-rearing], by Kaori Hata, Takako Okamoto, and Risako Ide, 39–116. Osaka: Osaka University Press.Google Scholar
Okutsu, Keiichirou. 1983. “Juju hyougen no taishoo kenkyuu [Comparative analysis of give and take expressions].” Nihongogaku [Japanese Studies] April: 2–4.Google Scholar
Ooe, Saburo. 1975. Nichieigo no Hikaku Kenkyu [Comparative Studies of Japanese and English]. Tokyo: Nanundo.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1986. “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimating Claims.” Human Studies 9: 219–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasagawa, Ayumi. 2006. “Mother-rearing: The social world of mothers in a Japanese suburb.” In The Changing Japanese Family, eds. by R. Marcus and A. Takenaka, 129–146. Oxon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sherzer, Joel. 1987. “A Discourse-Centered Approach to Language and Culture.” American Anthropologist 89(2): 2965–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael and Greg Urban, eds. 1996. Natural History of Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tessa, Carroll. 2006. “Changing Language, Gender and Family Relations in Japan.” In The Changing Japanese Family, eds. by R. Marcus and A. Takenaka, 119–126. Oxon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tsutui, Junya. 2016a. Kekkon to Kazoku no Korekara [The Future of Marriage and Family]. Tokyo: Kobunsha.Google Scholar
Tsutsui, Junya. 2016b. “Female Labor Participation and the Sexual Division of Labor: A Consideration on the Persistent Male-Breadwinner Model.” Japan Labor Review 13(3): 80–100.Google Scholar
Urban, Greg. 1991. A Discourse-Centered Approach to Culture: Native South American Myths and Rituals. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wetzel, Patricia. 1994. “A Movable Self: The Linguistic Indexing of uchi and soto .” In Situated Meaning: Inside and Outside in Japanese Self, Society and Language eds. by J. Bachnick and C. Quinn, 73–88. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, Masataka. 2007. “Finding Metaculture in Narrative: The Case of Diasporic Japanese in the United States.” SITES: A Journal of Social Anthropology and Cultural Studies 4(1): 122–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Discovering Shared Understanding in Discourse: Prototypes and Stereotypes.” In Approaches to Language, Culture and Cognition: The Intersection of Cognitive Linguistics and Linguistic Anthropology, eds. by M. Yamaguchi, D. Tay, and B. Blout, 217–233, New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Yim, Yong-chol and Risako Ide. 2004. Hashi to Chokkarak [Japanese Chopsticks, Korean Chopsticks] Tokyo: Taishuukan Shoten.Google Scholar
Yu, Wei-Hsin, and Janet Chen-Lan Kuo. 2018. “Does Parenthood Foster Traditionalism?: Childrearing and Alterations in Gender and Family Attitudes in Japan.” Social Forces 97(1) 221–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Chen, Junyuan
2023. Narratives to identities: Japanese graduate teaching assistants as language teachers. Journal of Language and Cultural Education 11:2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.