References (52)
References
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Asai, Yuichi. 2017. Girei no semiotikusu: Meranesia, Fiji ni okeru shinwa/shitei tekusuto no gengojinruigakuteki kenkyu [Semiotics of Rituals: Linguistic Anthropological Inquiry into Myths/Poetic Texts in Melanesian Fiji]. Tokyo: Sangensha.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981[1935]. The Dialogic Imagination: Four essays M. M. Bakhtin, ed. by M. Holquist, trans. by C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Alton L. 1995. Beyond Translation: Essays Toward a Modern Philology. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2001. “Investigating Narrative Inequality: African Asylum Seekers’ Stories in Belgium.” Discourse and Society 12 (4): 413–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power (John B. Thompson, ed.; translated by Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Charles. L. 1996. Disorderly Discourse: Narrative, Conflict, and Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2000. Language Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Reflections on Impoliteness, Relational Work and Power.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 17–44. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann. 2003. “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 545–579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2014. “Towards a Dialogic Syntax.” Cognitive Linguistics 25 (3): 359–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 1994. From Grammar to Politics: Linguistic Anthropology in a Western Samoan Village. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara. 1988. Discourse Structure and Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2001. Arguing about the Future: On Indirect Disagreements in Conversations. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1881–1900. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, Howard, Justine Coupland, and Nikolas Coupland. 1991. “Accommodation Theory: Communication, Context, and Consequence.” In Contexts of Accommodation, ed. by Howard Giles, Justine Coupland, and Nikolas Coupland, 1–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Allen. 1990. Conflict Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F. 1993. “Metalanguage and Pragmatics of Deixis.” In Reflexive language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. by John A. Lucy, 127–157. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Jane H. 2008. The Everyday Language of White Racism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishigakishi Kikakuseisakubu. 2017. Toukei Ishigaki [Statistics of Ishigaki] 39. Ishigaki City Municipal Office.Google Scholar
Iwata, Yuko. 2015. “Storytelling as Social and Cultural Practice: Self-Disclosure in English and Japanese First-Encounter Conversations.” Presented at the 15th International Pragmatics Conference at the University of Antwerp.
Jakobson, Roman. 1981 [66]. “Grammatical Parallelism and its Russian Facet.” Language 42 (2): 399–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara ed. 1994. Repetition in Discourse: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Kakavá, Christina. 1993. Negotiation of Disagreement by Greeks in Conversations and Classroom Discourse. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Linguistics, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Kádár, Daniel. 2017. Politeness, Impoliteness, and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Elinor Ochs. 1977. “Making it Last: Repetition in Children’s Discourse.” In Child Discourse, ed. by Susan Ervin-Tripp, and Claudia Mitchell-Kernan, 125–138. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kulick, Don. 1993. “Speaking as a Woman: Structure and Gender in Domestic Arguments in a New Guinea Village.” Cultural Anthropology 8 (4): 510–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lempert, Michael. 2012. Discipline and Debate: The Language of Violence in a Tibetan Buddhist Monastery. Oakland: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Limberg, Holger. 2009. “Impoliteness and Threat Responses.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 376–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. (ed). 1993. Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob. L. 2001 [1993]. Pragmatics: An Introduction, 2nd Edition. Oxford and Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Miki, Takeshi. 2010. Yaeyama Gasshuukoku no Keifu [The Genealogy of “the Yaeyama United States”]. Ishigaki: Nanzansha.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anna. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures in Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John M. Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Celia, et al. 1992. Language and Discrimination. London: Longman Publishing.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1987. “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organization, ed. by G. Button, and J. R. E. Lee, 54–69. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1985. “Everyday argument: The organization of diversity in talk.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, volume 3. Discourse and Dialogue, ed. by T. A. van Dijk, 35–46. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sifianou, Maria. 2012. “Disagreements, Face and Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1554–1564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1981. “The limits of awareness.” Sociolinguistic Working Paper, #84. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
. 1993. “Metapragmatic Discourse and Metapragmatic Function.” In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. by John A. Lucy, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1995 (1908). “Conflict.” In Conflict and the Web of Group affiliation, ed. and trans. by Kurt Wolff, 11–123. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Takanashi, Hiroko. 2011. “Complementary Stylistic Resonance in Japanese Play Framing.” Pragmatics 22 (2): 231–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takekuro, Makiko (ed). 2018. Sougokoui ni okeru disukodansu [Discordance in Interaction]. Tokyo: Hitsuji Publishers.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1987. “Repetition in Conversation: Towards a Poetics of Talk.” Language 63 (3): 574–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. The Argument Culture: Moving from Battle to Dialogue. New York: Ballentine Books.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Maria. 2008. “Toward a Unified Theory of Politeness, Impoliteness, and Rudeness.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and M. A. Locher, 45–74. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vološinov, Valentin N. 1973 [1929]. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilce, James M. 2008. “Scientizing Bangladeshi Psychiatry: Parallelism, Enregisterment, and the Cure for a Magic Complex.” Language in Society 37 (1): 91–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar