Chapter 5
Social consequences of common ground in the
act of bonding
A sociocognitive analysis of
intercultural encounters
This chapter is concerned
with the act of “bonding” in intercultural
encounters. Drawing on a sociocognitive theory
of context, I analyze interactions taken from my
fieldwork in the United States and research
interviews in New Zealand. Against the dominant
trend of antimentalism in linguistic anthropology,
I focus on common ground (CG) as a cognitive
context in interaction. Analytically, I attend to
face strategies and relationship implicative
actions. My point is argue that the notion of CG
needs to be refined and extended by taking into
account ideological components. For further
empirical studies, I suggest that we should
specify what kinds of ideologies are integrated
into components of common ground and explore how
we can create bonding between participants with
conflicting ideologies across national boundaries.
Implications for linguistic anthropology are also
discussed from an evolutionary perspective.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Research questions and background
theoretical concerns
- 3.Conceptual framework
- 3.1An overview of the sociocognitive
theory
- 3.2Common ground (CG)
- 3.3Two face strategies: Involvement and independence
- 3.4Relationship implicative actions
- 4.Background to data
- 5.Data analysis
- 5.1(Un)bonding in the discourse of war
- 5.2Bonding in narrating about
“whaling”
- 6.Discussion and implications
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
-
Appendix