Cover not available
Part of
Approaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and practice
Edited by Chaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus and Hartmut Haberland
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 318] 2021
► pp. 47–74

Chapter 2
Computer-mediated discourse in context

Pluralism of communicative action and discourse common ground

| University of Augsburg, Germany
This paper examines the particularisation of the pragmatic universals of contextualisation, indexicality of communicative action and implicature in computer-mediated discourse. It adopts a discourse-pragmatic perspective to account for the interdependencies between the contextual constraints and requirements of the medium on the one hand, and the multilayeredness and hypertextuality of computer-mediated discourse on the other. Particular attention is given to the importation of context and provision of background information, and to their contribution to the co-construction of discourse common ground. Utilising data, metadata and metarepresentations from the coverage of a former refugee taking up a Lord Mayor post, the paper shows how the pragmatic universals undergo medium-specific particularisation and count as multiply contextual communicative actions with multilayered production and reception formats.
Keywords: context, contextualisation, discourse common ground, implicature, participation format, pluralism of communicative action, pragmatic universal
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Context, contextualisation and indexicality of communicative action
    • 2.1Context and contexts, and types and tokens
    • 2.2Contextualisation cues and contextualisation
    • 2.3Indexicality of communicative action
  • 3.Pluralism of communicative action
    • 3.1Multilayered participation
    • 3.2Discourse common ground
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.318.02fet
References (49)
References
Alexander, Jeffrey C., and Bernhard Giesen. 1987. “Introduction.” In The Micro-Macro Link, Jeffrey C. Alexander, et al. (eds.), 1–42. Berkeley, Cal.: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1975. How to do Things with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Chandler Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1992. Understanding Utterances: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blom, Jonas Nygaard, and Hansen, Kenneth Reinecke. 2015. “Click Bait: Forward-Reference as Lure in Online News Headlines.” Journal of Pragmatics 76: 87–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garces-Conejos Blitvich. 2018. “Relational Work in Multimodal Networked Interactions on Facebook.” Internet Pragmatics 1(1): 134–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandom, Robert B. 1994. Making it Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cappelen, Herman, and Ernie Lepore. 2005. Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Thomas B. Carlson. 1982. “Hearers and Speech Acts.” Language 58(2): 332–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2004. Recontextualizing Context: Grammaticality meets Appropriateness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “‘Minister, We Will See How The Public Judges You’: Media References in Political Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 38(2): 180–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Reformulation and Common Grounds.” In Lexical Markers of Common Grounds, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Kerstin Fischer, 157–179. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
. 2011. “‘Here Is the Difference, Here Is the Passion, Here Is the Chance to Be Part of a Great Change’: Strategic Context Importation in Political Discourse.” In Context and Contexts: Parts Meet Whole?, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Etsuko Oishi, 115–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Contexts in Interaction: Relating Pragmatic Wastebaskets.” In What is a Context? Linguistic Approaches and Challenges, ed. by Rita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer, and Petra Schumacher, 105–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “The Dynamics of Discourse: Quantity Meets Quality.” In Implicitness: From Lexis to Discourse, ed. by Piotr Cap, and Marta Dynel, 235–257. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Discourse Pragmatics: Communicative Action Meets Discourse Analysis.” In Pragmatics and its Interfaces, ed. by Cornelia Ilie, and Neal Norrick, 33–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “‘And I Quote’: Forms and Functions of Quotations in Prime Minister’s Questions.” Journal of Pragmatics 157: 89–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, and Varol Akman. 2002. “Contexts of Social Action: Guest Editors’ Introduction.” Language and Communication 22(4): 391–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1994. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra, and Tereza Spilioti. 2016. “Introduction.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 1–15. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 2005. Context as Other Minds. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3, Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1992. “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1996. “The Linguistic and Cultural Relativity of Inference.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. by John J. Gumperz, and Stephen C. Levinson, 374–406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2003. “Response Essay.” In Language and Interaction: Discussions with John J. Gumperz, ed. by Susan L. Eerdmans, Carlo L. Prevignano, and Paul J. Thibault, 105–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haberland, Hartmut, and Janus Mortensen. 2016. “Transcription as Second-Order Entextualization: The Challenge of Heteroglossia.” In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. by Alessandro Capone, and Jacob L. Mey, 581–600. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2009. “Entextualization, Mediatization and Authentication: Orthographic Choice in Media Transcripts.” Text & Talk 29(5): 571–594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. 2014. Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther R. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. 2002. “Travels in Hypermodality.” Visual Communication 1(3): 299–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1988. “Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Concepts of Participation.” In Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew, and Andrew Wootton, 161–227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. “Contextualizing Contextualization Cues.” In Language and Interaction: Discussions with John J. Gumperz, ed. by Susan L. Eerdmans, Carlo L. Prevignano, and Paul J. Thibault, 31–40, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewinski, Marcin, and Mark Aakhus. 2014. “Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry.” Argumentation 28: 161–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mirović, Ivana, Vesna Bogdanović, and Vesna Bulatović. 2019. “The Role of Genre Hybridity and Hypermodality in Digital Knowledge Dissemination: The Case of the IEEE Spectrum.” In Science Communication on the Internet: Old Genres Meet New Genres, ed. by María-José Luzón, and Carmen Pérez-Llantada, 153–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oishi, Etsuko, and Anita Fetzer. 2016. “Expositives in Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 96: 49–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul, and Mary Bucholtz. 2009. “Introduction: Public Transcripts: Entextualization and Linguistic Representation in Institutional Contexts.” Text & Talk 29:485–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penco, Carlo. 1999. “Objective and Cognitive Context.” In Modeling and Using Context: Second International and Interdisciplinary Conference,CONTEXT’99 Trento, Italy, September 9–11, 1999 Proceedings, ed. by Paolo Bouquet, Luciano Serafini, Patrick Brézillon, Massimo Benerecetti, and Francesca Castellani, 270–283. Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 2002. “Cognition and Narrativity in Speech Act Sequences.” In Rethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics Meets Conversational Interaction, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Christiane Meierkord, 71–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Kate. 2015. “The Pragmatics of Hashtags: Inference and Conversational Style on Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics 81: 8–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 2010. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1999. Context and Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibault, Paul J. 2003. “Contextualization and Social Meaning-Making Practices.” In Language and Interaction: Discussions with John J. Gumperz, ed. by Susan L. Eerdmans, Carlo L. Prevignano, and Paul J. Thibault, 41–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael, and Malinda Carpenter. 2007. “Shared Intentionality.” Developmental Science 10(1): 121–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, David. 2011. Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now that the Facts aren’t the Facts, Experts are Everywhere, and the Smartest person in the Room is the Room. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda, and Anita Fetzer (eds.). 2015. Follow-Ups in Political Discourse: Explorations across Contexts Discourse Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deidre. 2012. “Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication.” In Meaning and Relevance, ed. by Deidre Wilson, and Dan Sperber, 230–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2011. Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Eslami, Zohreh R., Tatiana Viktorovna Larina & Roya Pashmforoosh
2023. Identity, politeness and discursive practices in a changing world. Russian Journal of Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Olajimbiti, Ezekiel Opeyemi
2023. ‘Pregnancy no bi disease’: Contextual beliefs in antenatal classes in selected Nigerian hospitals. Discourse Studies 25:6 ► pp. 755 ff. DOI logo
Rhee, Seongha
2023. Politeness and impoliteness in social network service communication in Korea. Russian Journal of Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2022. Doing things with discourse in the mediated political arena. Pragmatics and Society 13:5 ► pp. 769 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.