Part of
Approaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and practice
Edited by Chaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus and Hartmut Haberland
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 318] 2021
► pp. 4774
References
Alexander, Jeffrey C., and Bernhard Giesen
1987 “Introduction.” In The Micro-Macro Link, Jeffrey C. Alexander, et al. (eds.), 1–42. Berkeley, Cal.: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John L.
1975How to do Things with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Gregory
1972Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Chandler Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1992Understanding Utterances: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blom, Jonas Nygaard, and Hansen, Kenneth Reinecke
2015 “Click Bait: Forward-Reference as Lure in Online News Headlines.” Journal of Pragmatics 76: 87–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garces-Conejos Blitvich
2018 “Relational Work in Multimodal Networked Interactions on Facebook.” Internet Pragmatics 1(1): 134–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandom, Robert B.
1994Making it Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cappelen, Herman, and Ernie Lepore
2005Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Thomas B. Carlson
1982 “Hearers and Speech Acts.” Language 58(2): 332–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2006 “ ‘Minister, We Will See How The Public Judges You’: Media References in Political Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 38(2): 180–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “Reformulation and Common Grounds.” In Lexical Markers of Common Grounds, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Kerstin Fischer, 157–179. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2011 “ ‘Here Is the Difference, Here Is the Passion, Here Is the Chance to Be Part of a Great Change’: Strategic Context Importation in Political Discourse.” In Context and Contexts: Parts Meet Whole?, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Etsuko Oishi, 115–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Contexts in Interaction: Relating Pragmatic Wastebaskets.” In What is a Context? Linguistic Approaches and Challenges, ed. by Rita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer, and Petra Schumacher, 105–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “The Dynamics of Discourse: Quantity Meets Quality.” In Implicitness: From Lexis to Discourse, ed. by Piotr Cap, and Marta Dynel, 235–257. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Discourse Pragmatics: Communicative Action Meets Discourse Analysis.” In Pragmatics and its Interfaces, ed. by Cornelia Ilie, and Neal Norrick, 33–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 “ ‘And I Quote’: Forms and Functions of Quotations in Prime Minister’s Questions.” Journal of Pragmatics 157: 89–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, and Varol Akman
2002 “Contexts of Social Action: Guest Editors’ Introduction.” Language and Communication 22(4): 391–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1994Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra, and Tereza Spilioti
2016 “Introduction.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgakopoulou, and Tereza Spilioti, 1–15. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2005Context as Other Minds. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3, Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1992 “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1996 “The Linguistic and Cultural Relativity of Inference.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. by John J. Gumperz, and Stephen C. Levinson, 374–406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2003 “Response Essay.” In Language and Interaction: Discussions with John J. Gumperz, ed. by Susan L. Eerdmans, Carlo L. Prevignano, and Paul J. Thibault, 105–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haberland, Hartmut, and Janus Mortensen
2016 “Transcription as Second-Order Entextualization: The Challenge of Heteroglossia.” In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. by Alessandro Capone, and Jacob L. Mey, 581–600. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra
2009 “Entextualization, Mediatization and Authentication: Orthographic Choice in Media Transcripts.” Text & Talk 29(5): 571–594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan
2014Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther R.
2010Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L.
2002 “Travels in Hypermodality.” Visual Communication 1(3): 299–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1988 “Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Concepts of Participation.” In Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew, and Andrew Wootton, 161–227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2003 “Contextualizing Contextualization Cues.” In Language and Interaction: Discussions with John J. Gumperz, ed. by Susan L. Eerdmans, Carlo L. Prevignano, and Paul J. Thibault, 31–40, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewinski, Marcin, and Mark Aakhus
2014 “Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry.” Argumentation 28: 161–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mirović, Ivana, Vesna Bogdanović, and Vesna Bulatović
2019 “The Role of Genre Hybridity and Hypermodality in Digital Knowledge Dissemination: The Case of the IEEE Spectrum.” In Science Communication on the Internet: Old Genres Meet New Genres, ed. by María-José Luzón, and Carmen Pérez-Llantada, 153–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oishi, Etsuko, and Anita Fetzer
2016 “Expositives in Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 96: 49–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul, and Mary Bucholtz
2009 “Introduction: Public Transcripts: Entextualization and Linguistic Representation in Institutional Contexts.” Text & Talk 29:485–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penco, Carlo
1999 “Objective and Cognitive Context.” In Modeling and Using Context: Second International and Interdisciplinary Conference,CONTEXT’99 Trento, Italy, September 9–11, 1999 Proceedings, ed. by Paolo Bouquet, Luciano Serafini, Patrick Brézillon, Massimo Benerecetti, and Francesca Castellani, 270–283. Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina
2002 “Cognition and Narrativity in Speech Act Sequences.” In Rethinking Sequentiality: Linguistics Meets Conversational Interaction, ed. by Anita Fetzer, and Christiane Meierkord, 71–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Kate
2015 “The Pragmatics of Hashtags: Inference and Conversational Style on Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics 81: 8–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John
2010Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
1999Context and Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibault, Paul J.
2003 “Contextualization and Social Meaning-Making Practices.” In Language and Interaction: Discussions with John J. Gumperz, ed. by Susan L. Eerdmans, Carlo L. Prevignano, and Paul J. Thibault, 41–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael, and Malinda Carpenter
2007 “Shared Intentionality.” Developmental Science 10(1): 121–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, David
2011Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now that the Facts aren’t the Facts, Experts are Everywhere, and the Smartest person in the Room is the Room. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda, and Anita Fetzer
Wilson, Deidre
2012 “Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication.” In Meaning and Relevance, ed. by Deidre Wilson, and Dan Sperber, 230–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Eslami, Zohreh R., Tatiana Viktorovna Larina & Roya Pashmforoosh
2023. Identity, politeness and discursive practices in a changing world. Russian Journal of Linguistics 27:1  pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Fetzer, Anita
2022. Doing things with discourse in the mediated political arena. Pragmatics and Society 13:5  pp. 769 ff. DOI logo
Olajimbiti, Ezekiel Opeyemi
2023. ‘Pregnancy no bi disease’: Contextual beliefs in antenatal classes in selected Nigerian hospitals. Discourse Studies 25:6  pp. 755 ff. DOI logo
Rhee, Seongha
2023. Politeness and impoliteness in social network service communication in Korea. Russian Journal of Linguistics 27:1  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.