Cover not available
Part of
The Pragmatics of Adaptability
Edited by Daniel N. Silva and Jacob L. Mey
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 319] 2021
► pp. 55–74

Chapter 3
Adapting to changing concepts of time

From life to fiction

| University of Graz
Time concepts have been developed throughout human history and different academic disciplines have theorized time. What is more, people’s time regimes have changed through adapting to the introduction of new techniques of production. After discussing changing conceptions of time in the life of human beings the article focuses on a science fiction account of a different view of time represented by aliens in the short story “Story of Your Life” by Ted Chiang (2002). The story features interactions of a linguist (and physicists) with aliens. The paper looks at how the main protagonist slowly adapts to the mode of simultaneous time reflected in the alien’s grammar (which means the simultaneity of past, present and future) when learning their language and analyses how this is represented linguistically in the story.
Keywords: time concepts, (new) technology, space-time, time travel, science-fiction
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theories about time
    • 2.1Time in the natural sciences
    • 2.2A social theory of time
  • 3.Adaptability and the temporal nature of experience
    • 3.1Culture and concepts of time
    • 3.2Time in language
      • Changes in patterns and experiences of time in history
  • 4.Time and the introduction of new technology
  • 5.Multitasking – moving towards simultaneous time and P-time?
  • 6.Simultaneous consciousness and time: The science fiction short story “Story of Your Life” by Ted Chiang (2002)
    • 6.1The conception of time in “Story of Your Life”
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 17 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.319.03pen
References (36)
References
Arrival. 2016. Dir. Denis Villeneuve. USA: Lava Bear Films.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Baron, Naomi S. 2008. Always on. Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baym, Nancy, Yan Bing Zhang, and Mei-Chen Lin. 2004. “Social Interactions across Media: Interpersonal Communication on the Internet, Face-to-Face, and the Telephone.” New Media & Society 6: 299–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera. 2000. “Metaphoric Structuring: Understanding Time through Spatial Metaphors.” Cognition 75: 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Does Language Shape Thought?: Mandarin and English Speakers’ Conception of Time.” Cognitive Psychology 43: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “How Languages Construct Time.” In Space, Time and Number in the Brain: Searching for the Foundations of Mathematical Thought, ed. by Stanislas Dehaene and Elizabeth Brannon, 333–341. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chiang, Ted. 2002. “Story of Your Life.” In Stories of Your Life and Others, Ted Chiang, 91–145. Easthampton, Mass.: Small Beer Press.Google Scholar
Crook, Charles, and David Barrowcliff. 2001. “Ubiquitous Computing on Campus: Patterns of Engagement by University Students.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 13: 245–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1984. Über die Zeit. Arbeiten zur Wissenssoziologie II. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Feynman, Richard. 1999. The Meaning of It All. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Fuhrman, Orly, Kelly McCormick, Eva Chen, Heidi Jiang, Dingfang Shu, Shuaimei Mao, and Lera Boroditsky. 2011. “How Linguistic and Cultural Forces Shape Conceptions of Time: English and Mandarin Time in 3D.” Cognitive Science 35: 1305–1328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gu, Yuego. 2012. “Discourse Geography.” In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by James Paul Gee and Michael Handford, 541–557. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hall, Edward T. 1959. The Silent Language. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Co.Google Scholar
1983. The Dance of Life. The Other Dimension of Time. New York & Toronto: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 1990. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Inquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford & Cambridge, Mass.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawking, Stephen. 1996. A Brief History of Time. From the Big Bang to Black Holes. London: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Hewlett-Packard. 2005. “‘Abuse of Technology Can Reduce UK Workers’ Intelligence.” Small & Medium Business Press release, April 22.Google Scholar
Junco, Reynold, and Shelia R. Cotton. 2012. “No A 4 U: The relationship between Multitasking and Academic Performance.” Computers and Education 59: 505–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kern, Stephen. 2003 [1983]. The Culture of Time and Space, 1880–1918. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kirschner, Paul A., and Aryn C. Karpinski. 2010. Computers in Human Behavior 26: 1237–1245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Heejin, and Edgar A. Whitley. 2002. “Time and Information Technology: Temporal Impacts on Individuals, Organizations, and Society.” The Information Society 18: 235–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2000. When Voices Clash. A Study in Literary Pragmatics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis. 2009. “Uneven Accelerations.” New Media & Society 11 (1–2): 299–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ong, Walter J. 1982. Orality and Literacy. The Technologizing of the Word. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reading, Anna 2012. “Globital Time: Time in the Digital Globalised Age.” In Time, Media and Modernity, ed. by Emily Kneightly, 143–162. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rosa, Hartmut. 2014. Beschleunigung. Die Veränderung der Zeitstrukturen in der Moderne. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Schwarzenegger, Christian. 2012. “Exploring Digital Yesterdays – Reflections on New Media and the Future of Communication History.” Historical Social Research 37 (4): 118–133Google Scholar
Stanzel, Franz K. 1971. Narrative Situations in the Novel. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Tenbrink, Thora. 2007. Space, Time and the Use of Language. An Investigation of Relationships. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thompson, Edward P. 1967. “Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism.” Past & Present 38: 56–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1956. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, ed. by John B. Carroll, 134–159. New York & London: MIT Press.Google Scholar