Cover not available
Part of
The Pragmatics of Adaptability
Edited by Daniel N. Silva and Jacob L. Mey
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 319] 2021
► pp. 101–116

Chapter 5
Ad-appting children’s stories

| University of Southern Denmark
This chapter studies the multimedia adaptation of a classic children’s story, Dr Seuss’ The Cat in the Hat. Mixing story-telling with instructional instrumentality and lacking an interactive relationship with the story-teller, the story loses the ‘enchantment’ which, Bettelheim has argued, makes story-telling fundamental in the child’s development.
Keywords: adaptation, enchantment, multimedia, orality, story-telling
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Enchantment
  • 3.Instruction
  • 4. The Cat in the Hat
  • 5. The adaptation
    • Sound
    • Voice
    • Music
    • Camera movement
    • Reading the story
    • Interactivity
    • Parental control
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 17 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.319.05van
References (18)
References
Berenstain, Stan, and Jan Berenstain. 1967. The Bear Scouts. New York: Random HouseGoogle Scholar
Bettelheim, Bruno. 1978. The Uses of Enchantment. London: Peregrine.Google Scholar
Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen Rosa, and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2003. “Teddy Bear Stories.” Social Semiotics 13 (1): 5–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Djonov, Emilia, and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2014. “Bullet Points, New Writing and the Marketization of Public Discourse: A Critical Multimodal Perspective.” In Critical Multimodal Studies of Popular Discourse, ed. by Emilia Djonov and Sumin Zhao, 232–250. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 2003. Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kvåle, Gunhild. 2016. “Software as ideology: A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis of Microsoft Word and SmartArt.” Journal of Language and Politics 15 (3): 259–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Julia, and Karen James. 2016. “Handwriting Generates Variable Visual Output to Facilitate Symbol Recognition.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145 (3): 298–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longcamp, Marieke, Marie-Therese Zerbato-Poudou, and Jean-Luc Velag. 2005. “The Influence of Writing Practice on Letter Recognition in Preschool Children: A Comparison between Handwriting and Typing.” Acta Psychologica 119 (1): 67–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Machin, David, and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2007. Global Media Discourse – A critical introduction. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mak, Geert. 1999. De eeuw van mijn vader [The Century of My Father]. Amsterdam: Atlas.Google Scholar
Mead, Margaret, and Martha Wolfenstein, eds. 1951. Childhood in Contemporary Cultures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mukarovsky, Jan. 1964 [1932]. “Standard Language and Poetic Language.” In A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structure and Style, ed. by Paul L. Garvin. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. 2002. Orality and Literacy – The Technologizing of the Word (2nd edition). London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Richardson, John. 1997. “The Wild Bears.” In The Hutchinson Treasury of Teddy Bear Tales, ed. by Suzanne Gretz, 34–44. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Riesman, David. 1951. “‘Tootler’: A Modern Cautionary Tale.” In Childhood in Contemporary Cultures, ed. by Margaret Mead and Martha Wolfenstein. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 2006. The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint: Pitching Out Corrupts Within. Cheshire, Conn.: Graphics Press LLC.Google Scholar
Wolfenstein, Martha. 1951. “Fun Morality: An Analysis of Recent American Child-Training Literature.” In Childhood in Contemporary Cultures, ed. by Margaret Mead, and Martha Wolfenstein, 168–178. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zhao, Sumin, Emilia Djonov, and Theo Van Leeuwen. 2014. “Semiotic Technology and Practice: A Multimodal Social Semiotic Approach to Powerpoint.” Text & Talk 34 (3): 349–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar