Remarks on suspended clauses

Cited by 13 other publications

No author info given

2016.  In Intonation Units Revisited [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 29],

Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap

2015. Evidentiality in interaction. Studies in Language 39:1 ► pp. 46 ff.

Evans, Nicholas & Honoré Watanabe

2016.  In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115], ► pp. 1 ff.

Gras, Pedro

2016.  In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115], ► pp. 113 ff.

Haugh, Michael

2008. Utterance-final conjunctive particles and implicature in Japanese conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 18:3 ► pp. 425 ff.

Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck & Tania Kuteva

2016.  In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115], ► pp. 39 ff.

Higashiizumi, Yuko

2015.  In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166], ► pp. 135 ff.

Izutsu, Katsunobu & Mitsuko Narita Izutsu

2016.  In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 336], ► pp. 377 ff.

Laury, Ritva

2012. Syntactically Non-Integrated FinnishJos‘If’-Conditional Clauses as Directives. Discourse Processes 49:3-4 ► pp. 213 ff.

Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo

2016.  In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115], ► pp. 145 ff.

Narrog, Heiko

2016.  In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115], ► pp. 247 ff.

Sarvasy, Hannah

2015. Breaking the clause chains. Studies in Language 39:3 ► pp. 664 ff.

Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina

2005. “There is more here than meets the eye!”: the use of final ou in two sequential positions in Mandarin Chinese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 37:7 ► pp. 967 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.