Cover not available
Part of
How Emotions Are Made in Talk
Edited by Jessica S. Robles and Ann Weatherall
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 321] 2021
► pp. 101–128

Chapter 2.1
Using objects and technologies in the immediate environment as resources for managing affect displays in troubles talk

ORCID logo | Loughborough University
ORCID logo | West Chester University
ORCID logo | West Chester University

This chapter shows how the communicative affordances of material objects in the local environments, including mobile phones and laptops, provide resources for participants to manage displays of affect during troubles talk, including potentially enacting or resisting affiliative recipiency. Specifically, we highlight embodied practices through which speakers employ such devices as an interactional resource to keep emotional displays off-record in order to preserve the ongoing action trajectory while participants negotiate affiliative work.

Keywords: multitasking, multiactivity, mobile technology, new communication technology, embodiment, affect, storytelling, troubles talk, affiliation, alignment
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Troubles talk, affiliation, and emotion
    • 2.1Multiactivity, embodiment, and objects in interaction
  • 3.Methods
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Providing for affect in recipiency
    • 4.2Managing disagreement
    • 4.3Pursuing more affiliation
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 12 May 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.321.04rob
References (70)
Aaltonen, Tarya, Illka Arminen, and Sanna Raudaskoski
2014 “Photo Sharing as A Joint Activity Between an Aphasic Speaker and Others.” In Interacting with Objects: Language, materiality, and social activity, ed. by Maurice Nevile Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann and Mirka Rauniomaa, 125–144. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aakhus, Mark, and Stephen M. DiDomenico
2016 “Language and Interaction in New-Media Environments.” In Handbook of Verbal Communication, ed. by Louis De Saussure, and Andrea Rocci, 375–394. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beach, Wayne A., and Curtis D. LeBaron
2002 “Body disclosures: Attending to Personal Problems and Reported Sexual Abuse During a Medical Encounter.” Journal of Communication 52: 617–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Besnier, Niko
1990 “Language and Affect.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 419–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Barry, Moira McGregor, and Donald McMillan
2014 “100 days of iPhone Use: Understanding the Details of Mobile Device Use.” In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services, pp. 223–232. ACM. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Barry, Moira McGregor, and Eric Laurier
2013 “iPhone in Vivo: Video Analysis of Mobile Device Use.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, pp. 1031–1040. ACM. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2012 “Exploring Affiliation in the Reception of Conversational Complaint Stories” Ed. by Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen Emotions in interaction, 113–146. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf
2014 “Multimodal Participation in Simultaneous Joint Projects.” In Multiactivity in Social interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. by Pentii Haddington, Tiina Heinemann, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Neville, 247–281. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DiDomenico, Stephen M., and Jeffrey Boase
2013 “Bringing Mobiles into the Conversation: Applying a Conversation Analytic Approach to the Study of Mobile Phones in Co-Present Interaction.” In Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media, ed. by Deborah Tannen, and Ann Trester, 119–132. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
DiDomenico, Stephen M., Raclaw, Joshua, and Robles, Jessica S.
2020 “Attending to the Mo- bile Text Summons: Managing Multiple Communicative Activities Across Co-Present And Technologically-Mediated Interpersonal Interactions.” Communication Research, 47(5), 669–700.. 0093650218803537. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
1998 “Complaints About Transgressions and Misconduct.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31: 295–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Tracy, Walker
2009 “Going Too Far: Complaining, Escalating and Disaffiliation.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 2400–2414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Derek
2007 “Managing Subjectivity in Talk.” In Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction, ed. by Alexa Hepburn, and Sally Wiggins, 31–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freese, Jeremy, and Douglas W. Maynard, Douglas
1998 “Prosodic Features of Bad News and Good News in Conversation.” Language in Society 27: 195–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1963) Behavior in public places. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-face Behavior. Thousand Oaks: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving.
1978 “Response cries”. Language, 787–815. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, James
1977 “The Theory of Affordances.” In Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, ed. by Robert E. Shaw, and John Bransford, 67–82. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
2007 “ Participation, Stance, And Affect in the Organization of Activities.” Discourse & Society, 18: 53–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Cekaite, Asta
2018 Embodied Family Choreography: Practices of Control, Care, and Mundane Creativity. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Charles Goodwin
2000 “Emotion Within Situated Activity.” In Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 239–57. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haddington, Pentti
2006 “The Organization of Gaze and Assessments as Resources for Stance Taking.” Text & Talk 26: 281–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haddington, Pentti, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile
2014 “Towards Multiactivity as a Social and Interactional Phenomenon.” In Multiactivity in Social interaction: Beyond Multitasking, ed. by Pentii Haddington, Tiina Heinemann, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Neville, 3–32. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Christian
2002 “Demonstrative Suffering: The Gestural (Re) Embodiment of Symptoms.” Journal of Communication 52: 597–616. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa
2004 “Crying: Notes on Description, Transcription, and Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37: 251–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984 Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2011 “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John and Geoff Raymond
2005 “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-In-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 15–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian
2001 “Technologies, Texts and Affordances.” Sociology 35: 441–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1984 “Notes on A Systematic Deployment of the Acknowledgement Tokens “Yeah”; and ‘Mm hm’” ed. by J. M. Atkinson and John Heritage Structures of Social Action, 197–216. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
1988 “On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-Talk in Ordinary Conversation.” Social Problems 35: 418–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with n Introduction.” Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 125: 13–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Laura and Alexa Hepburn
2015 “Children’s Sensations as Interactional Phenomena: A Conversation Analysis of Children’s Expressions of Pain and Discomfort.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 12: 472–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaukomaa, Timo, Anssi Peräkylä, and Johanna Ruusuvuori
2013 “Turn-opening Smiles.” Journal of Pragmatics 55: 21–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Foreshadowing a Problem: Turn-Opening Frowns in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 71:132–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “How Listeners Use Facial Expression to Shift the Emotional Stance of The Speaker’s Utterance.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 48: 319–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Seung-Hee and Hiroko Tanaka
2016 “Affiliation and Alignment in Responding Actions.” Journal of Pragmatics, 100: 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene
2004 “Collaborative Turn Sequences.” In: Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene Lerner, 225–256. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Licoppe, Christian, and Julien Figeac
2018 “Gaze Patterns and the Temporal Organization of Multiple Activities in Mobile Smartphone Uses.” Human-Computer Interaction 33: 311–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ling, Rich, and Leslie Haddon
2003 “Mobile Telephony, Mobility, and the Coordination of Everyday Life.” In Machines That Become Us: The Social Context of Personal Communication Technology, ed. by James Katz, 245–265. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
Lindström, Anna, and Sorjonen, Marja-Leena
2013 “Affiliation in Interaction.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 350–369. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Madianou, Mirca
2014 “Smartphones as Polymedia.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19: 667–680. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, Jenny
1991 “Conversational Non-Cooperation: An Exploration of Disattended Complaints.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 25(1–4): 97–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Storytelling in Conversation.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 492–508. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W.
1988 “Language, Interaction, and Social Problems.” Social Problems, 35: 311–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Defensive Mechanisms: I-Mean-Prefaced Utterances in Complaint and Other Conversational Sequences.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, 198–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W. and Pamela L. Hudak
2008 “Small Talk, High Stakes: Interactional Disattentiveness in the Context of Prosocial Doctor-Patient Interaction.” Language in Society 37: 661–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2014 “The Local Constitution of Multimodal Resources for Social Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 65: 137–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 “Rethinking Bodies and Objects in Social Interaction: A Multimodal and Multisensorial Approach to Tasting.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, 109–134. Springer VS, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Ogiermann, Eva
2015 “Direct Off-record Requests? – ‘Hinting’ in Family Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 86: 31–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raclaw, Joshua, Stephen M. DiDomenico, and Jessica S. Robles
2018, November. “Doing Recipiency or “Phubbing”? A Look at Demonstrable Orientations Towards Mobile Phones In Conversation.” Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Communication Association in Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Raclaw, Joshua, Jessica S. Robles, and Stephen M. DiDomenico
2016 “Providing Epistemic Support for Assessments Through Mobile-Supported Sharing Activities.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49: 362–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey, and John Heritage
2006 “The Epistemics of Social Relations: Owning Grandchildren.” Language in Society 35: 677–705. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D.
2003 “An Interactional Structure of Medical Activities During Acute Visits and its Implications for Patients’ Participation.” Health Communication, 15: 27–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robles, Jessica S., Stephen M. DiDomenico, and Joshua Raclaw
2018 “Doing Being an Ordinary Technology and Social Media User.” Language and Communication 60: 150–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruusuvuori, Johanna
2005 “’Empathy’ And ‘Sympathy’ in Action: Attending to Patients’ Troubles in Finnish Homeopathic and General Practice Consultations.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 204–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Emotion, Affect and Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 330–349. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992 Lectures on Conversation, ed. by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret
1994 “Emphatic Speech Style – With Special Focus on The Prosodic Signalling f Heightened Emotive Involvement in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 22: 375–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Affectivity in Conversational Storytelling.” Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 20: 229–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “The Display and Management of Affectivity in Climaxes of Amusing Stories.” Journal of Pragmatics 111: 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1995 “Discourse as an Interactional Achievement III: The Omnirelevance of Action.” Research on language and social interaction, 28(3): 185–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1982 “Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences.” In: D. Tannen ed., Analyzing discourse: Text and talk, 71–93. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Chloe, & Alexa Hepburn
2013 “Managing the moral implications of advice in informal interaction”. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(4), 344–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
2005 “On Complainability.” Social Problems 52: 449–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä
2012 “Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45: 297–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2008 “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41: 31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Karen
1997 “Interactional Trouble in Emergency Service Requests: A Problem of Frames.” Research on Language and Social interaction, 30: 315–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by 1 other publications

Muntigl, Peter, Lynda Chubak & Lynne Angus
2023. Responding to In-the-Moment Distress in Emotion-Focused Therapy. Research on Language and Social Interaction 56:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.