Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries
Edited by Daniël Van Olmen and Jolanta Šinkūnienė
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 325] 2021
► pp. 77–110

Chapter 3
Presentation followed by negotiation

Final pragmatic particle sequencing in Ainu

ORCID logo | Hokkaido University of Education,
ORCID logo | Fuji Women’s University,
This study explores the sequential pattern of sentence- or utterance-final pragmatic particles in Ainu, an indigenous language of Japan, and demonstrates that the particle sequences largely exhibit an ordering summarized as presentation followed by negotiation: a particle concerning the “presentation” of a speech act is followed by another particle representing the “negotiation” with the addressee for a speech act. These “presenting” and “negotiating” functions are further analyzed with respect to the speech event conception that underlies those functions.
Keywords: final particle, pragmatic particle, order, attitude, stance
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A grammatical overview of Ainu
  • 3.Discourse-pragmatic analysis of final particles in Ainu
    • 3.1Final particles and speech act types
    • 3.2Stance marking with directive-type final particles
    • 3.3Stance marking with reactive-type final particles
    • 3.4Stance orientation and speech act management
  • 4.Final particles in sequence and their functions
    • 4.1Particle sequence yan un
    • 4.2Particle sequence na hani
    • 4.3Particle sequence yan hani
  • 5.Motivations for final particle sequence order
    • 5.1Presentation followed by negotiation
    • 5.2Cross-linguistic similarity and possible motivations
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.325.03izu
References (54)
References
Batchelor, John. 1887. “A Grammar of the Ainu Language.” In The Language, Mythology, and Geographical Nomenclature of Japan Viewed in the Light of Aino Studies; Including “An Ainu Grammar” by John Batchelor, and a Catalogue of Books Relating to Yezos and the Ainos, ed. by Basil Hall Chamberlain, 77–136. Tokyo: Imperial University.Google Scholar
. 1889. An Ainu-English-Japanese Dictionary and Grammar. Hakodate: Hokkaidocho.Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth. 1975. “Peer Relations and the Acquisition of Language.” In Friendship and Peer Relations, ed. by Michael Lewis, and Leonard A. Rosenblum, 259–292. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
. 1979. The Emergence of Symbols: Cognition and Communication in Infancy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan. 1989. “Styles of Stance in English: Lexical and Grammatical Marking of Evidentiality and Affect.” Text 9 (1): 93–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni, and Andrzej Zuczkowski. 2018. “Epistemic Stance Negotiation: Some Examples from Italian Conversations.” Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 135: 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caselli, Maria Cristina. 1990. “Communicative Gestures and First Words.” In From Gesture to Language in Hearing and Deaf Children, ed. by Virginia Volterra, and Carol. J. Erting, 56–67. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chiri, Mashiho. 1973 [1942]. “Ainu Goho Kenkyu: Karafuto Hogen o Chushin toshite [A study of Ainu grammar: With a special reference to the Sakhalin Dialect].” In Chiri Mashiho Chosakushu 3: Seikatsushi Minzokugaku hen [Collected works of Mashiho Chiri 3: Volume of ethnography and ethnology], 455–586. Tokyo: Heibonsha.Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, and Benjamin Fagard. 2011. “ Alors between Discourse and Grammar: The Role of Syntactic Position.” Functions of Language 18 (1): 29–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortescue, Michael, Marianne Mithun, and Nicholas Evans (eds). 2017. The Oxford Handbook of Polysynthesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 2011. “The Sequencing of Contrastive Discourse Markers in English.” Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature, and Culture 1: 29–35.Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander. 2019. “Discourse Marker Sequences: Insights into the Serial Order of Communicative Tasks in Real-time Turn Production.” Journal of Pragmatics 146: 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Institute of Language Teaching [Gogaku Kyoiku Kenkyujo] (ed.). 1984–1989. Ainugo Onsei Shiryo [Ainu language phonetic materials] vols.1–6. Tokyo: Waseda University.Google Scholar
Izutsu, Katsunobu, and Mitsuko Narita Izutsu. 2020. “Dichotomous or Continuous?: Final Particles and a Dualistic Conception of Grammar.” In Grammar and Cognition: Dualistic Models of Language Structure and Language Processing, ed. by Alexander Haselow, and Gunther Kaltenböck, 159–190. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita, and Katsunobu Izutsu. 2015. “Cancelation, Confirmation, and Establishment: Three Facets of Grounding Marked by Japanese Final Particles.” Paper presented at the 14th International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp, July.
. forthc. “ Very Simple, Though, Isn’t it?: Pragmatic Marker Sequencing at Right Periphery.” Journal of Pragmatics.
Jin, Gang. 2009. “Mongorugo no Shujoshi no Shosetsu nitsuite: Kopasu ni Motozuku Kijutsuteki Kenkyu [On the sequential ordering of Mongolian final particles: A corpus-based descriptive study].” In Kopasu o Mochiita Gengo Kenkyu no Kanosei [Potentials of corpus-based studies], ed. by Nobuo Tomimori, Makoto Minegishi, and Yuji Kawaguchi, 129–147. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Kazama, Shinjiro. 2003. “Arutai Shogengo no 3 Gurupu (Churuku, Mongoru, Tsungusu), oyobi Chosengo, Nihongo no Bunpo wa Hontoni Niteirunoka: Taisho Bunpo no Kokoromi [Do the three groups of the “Altaic” languages (Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic), as well as Korean, really resemble Japanese grammatical structure?: An attempt at a contrastive grammar analysis].” In Nihongo Keitoron no Genzai [Perspectives on the origins of the Japanese language], ed. by Alexander Vovin, and Toshiki Osada, 249–340. Kyoto: International Research Center for Japanese StudiesGoogle Scholar
Kindaichi, Kyosuke. 1931. Ainu Jojishi Yukara no Kenkyu 2 [A study of Ainu epic Yukar 2]. Tokyo: Toyo Bunko.Google Scholar
Kindaichi, Kyosuke, and Mashiho Chiri. 1936. Ainu Goho Gaisetsu [An overview of Ainu grammar]. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
Koops, Christian, and Arne Lohmann. 2013. “Discourse Marker Sequencing and Grammaticalization.” In Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by Marc Ettlinger, Nicholas Fleisher, and Mischa Park-Doob, 108–122. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “A Quantitative Approach to the Grammaticalization of Discourse Markers: Evidence from their Sequencing Behavior.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20 (2): 232–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubodera, Itsuhiko. 1977. Ainu Jojishi Shinyo Seiden no Kenkyu [A study of Ainu god tales and holy tradition]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2015 [1995]. Thoughts on Grammaticalization, 3rd edition. Berlin: Language Sciences Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, Arne, and Christian Koops. 2016. “Aspects of Discourse Marker Sequencing: Empirical Challenges and Theoretical Implications.” In Outside the Clause: Form and Function of Extra-clausal Constituents, ed. by Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer, and Arne Lohmann, 417–445. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael. 1994. “Metalanguaging and Discourse Markers in Bilingual Conversation.” Language in Society 23 (3): 325–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minami, Fujio. 1993. Gendai Nihongo Bunpo no Rinkaku [An outline of present-day Japanese]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
Mueller, Edward, and Thomas Lucas. 1975. “A Developmental Analysis of Peer Interaction among Toddlers.” In Friendship and Peer Relations, ed. by Michael Lewis, and Leonard A. Rosenblum, 223–257. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Nagata, Hosei. 1883. Hokkai Shobunten [A short grammar of Hokkai]. Hakodate: Hakodate Prefecture.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1996. “Linguistic Resources for Socializing Humanity.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. by John J. Gumperz, and Stephen C. Levinson, 407–437. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Okuda, Osami. 1997. “Ainugo Shizunai Hogen no Fukujoshi to Shujoshi [Adverbial particles and sentence final particles in the Shizunai dialect of Ainu].” Bulletin of the Hokkaido Ainu Culture Research Center 3: 195–214.Google Scholar
Paik, Pong Ja. 2007. Wegugeo roseo eui Hangugeo Munbeob Sajeon [Korean grammar as a foreign language]. Seoul: Hau.Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud. 2014. “Why Particles are not Particular: Sentence-final Particles in Chinese as Heads of a Split CP.” Studia Linguistica 68 (1): 77–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfizmaier, August. 1996 [1851]. “Untersuchungen über den Bau der Aino-Sprache. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie zu Wien.” In Early European Writings on the Ainu Language, vol. 8, ed. by Kirsten Refsing, 382–490. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Piłsudski, Bronisław. 1998 [1912]. “Materials for the Study of the Ainu Language and Folklore.” In The Collected Works of Bronisław Piłsudski, vol.2: Ainu Language and Folklore Materials, ed. by Alfred F. Majewicz, 1–272. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador. 2018. “The Combination of Discourse Markers in Spontaneous Conversations: Keys to Untying a Gordian Knot.” Revue Romane 53 (1): 121–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saji, Keizo. 1957. “Shujoshi no Kino [Functions of final particles].” Kokugo Kokubun 26 (7): 23–31.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Nihongo Kyoiku to Bunpo Gakusetsu [Japanese language teaching and theories of grammar].” Nihongogaku 20: 6–10.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1990. The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shinzato, Rumiko. 2007. “(Inter)subjectification, Japanese Syntax and Syntactic Scope Increase.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8 (2): 171–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Andrew. 2014. “Sentence-final Particles.” In The Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, ed. by C.-T. James Huang, Y.-H. Audrey Li, and Andrew Simpson, 156–179. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Hideo. 1976. “Gendai Nihongo niokeru Shujoshi no Hataraki to Sono Sogo Shosetsu nitsuite [On the function and sequencing of sentence-final particles in present-day Japanese].” Kokugo to Kokubungaku 53 (11): 58–70.Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint, and Boya Li. 2007. “The Dissection and Structural Mapping of Cantonese Sentence Final Particles.” Lingua 117 (10): 1739–1787. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tamura [Fukuda], Suzuko. 1961. “Ainugo Saru Hogen no Fukujoshi to Shujoshi: Ainugo no Joshi nitsuite no Hokoku Sono 2 [A study of the particles of the Saru dialect of Ainu (II): Adverbial particles and final particles].” Gengo Kenkyu 39: 21–38.Google Scholar
Tamura, Suzuko. 2001 [1977]. “Ainugo Saru Hogen no Meirei Hyogen [Imperative expressions in the Saru dialect of Ainu].” In Ainugoko 5: Bunpo 2 [Ainu language study anthology 5: Grammar 2], ed. by Yumani Shobo Henshubu, 22–141. Tokyo: Yumani Shobo.Google Scholar
. 1997 [1988]. “Ainugo.” In Gengogaku Daijiten Serekushon [An encyclopedia of linguistics: Selection], ed. by Takashi Kamei, Rokuro Kono, and Eiichi Chino, 1–88. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
. 1996. Ainugo Saru Hogen Jiten [An Ainu language dictionary of the Saru dialect]. Tokyo: Sofukan.Google Scholar
Uehara, Kumajiro, and Chozaburo Abe. 1804. Moshiogusa [Leaves scraped together]. Unknown: unknown.Google Scholar
Vicher, Anne, and David Sankoff. 1989. “The Emergent Syntax of Pre-sentential Turn Openings.” Journal of Pragmatics 13 (1): 81–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Minoru. 1974. Kokugo Bunporon [A grammatical theory of Japanese]. Tokyo: Kasamashoin.Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2010. Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “The Dialogic Principles Revisited: Speech Acts and Mental States.” In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture, and Society, ed. by Alessandro Capone, and Jacob L. Mey, 209–232. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Izutsu, Katsunobu & Mitsuko Narita Izutsu
2023. Chapter 11. Highlighting beginning, end, or transition in-between. In Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 227], ► pp. 295 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.