Part of
Intersubjectivity in Action: Studies in language and social interaction
Edited by Jan Lindström, Ritva Laury, Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 326] 2021
► pp. 429
Bickel, Balthasar, Bernard Comrie, and Martin Haspelmath
2008 “The Leipzig Glossing Rules: Conventions for Interlinear Morpheme-by-Morpheme Glosses.” Department of Linguistics, Max Plack Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology; Department of Linguistics, University of Leipzig Accessed 13 March 2021 Available at: [URL]Google Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa, and Galina B. Bolden
2013 “The Conversation Analytic Approach to Transcription.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 57–76. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, LorenzA.
2019 “Conventions for Transcribing Multimodality” Accessed 13 March 2021 Available at:  [URL]Google Scholar
Selting, Margret
, et al. 2009 “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2).” Gesprächforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 10: 353–402.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2015Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building responsive actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar