Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatics and Translation
Edited by Miriam A. Locher, Daria Dayter and Thomas C. Messerli
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 337] 2023
► pp. 250–280

Chapter 11
From the sensing body to language, and back

Tasting and expressing taste

| University of Basel
Tasting sessions are an exemplary setting to investigate how participants choose descriptors for expressing sensorial judgments, based upon their own sensorial experience, as well as on existing available terminologies in different languages. On the basis of video-recorded tasting sessions of amateurs and professionals, the study shows how participants navigate between different types of descriptions – vocalizations, lexical descriptors, and clausal descriptions – in different languages, within ordinary vs specialized professional repertoires. Based on multimodal conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, the study reveals how they establish the interactional semantics of the descriptors in both a situated and a standardized/standardizing way, and they establish the (un)translatability of these descriptors. Different conceptions of translation and translatability are discussed, contributing to a pragmatic of translation sensu latu.
Keywords: Social interaction, conversation analysis, multimodality, embodiment, language, sensoriality, materiality, sensory lexicon, tasting, describing
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The sensory lexicon across languages and activities
  • 3.Data and method
  • 4.Associating a sensory feature and a descriptor
  • 5.The mediation of semiotic tools
  • 6.From language to sensations, and back
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Transcription conventions
  • References
Published online: 19 September 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.337.11mon
References (40)
References
Bilmes, Jack. 2011. “Occasioned Semantics: A Systematic Approach to Meaning in Talk.” Human Studies 34(2): 129–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Callon, Michael. 1984. “Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” The Sociological Review 32:196–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cassin, Barbara, ed. 2004. Dictionnaire des intraduisibles. Vocabulaire européen des philosophies. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Croijmans, Ilja, and Asifa Majid. 2016. “Not All Flavor Expertise is Equal: the Language of Wine and Coffee Experts.” PLoS ONE 11(6): e0155845. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2011. “The Study of Formulations as a Key to an Interactional Semantics.” Human Studies 34(2): 115–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “Interaktionale Semantik.” In. Semantiktheorien II. Analysen von Wort- und Satzbedeutungen im Vergleich, ed. by Jörg Hagemann and Sven Staffeldt, 235–278. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Fele, Giolo. 2019. “Olfactory Objects: Recognizing, Describing and Assessing Smells during Professional Tasting Sessions.” In Objects, Bodies and Work Practice, ed. by Dennis Day and Johannes Wagner, 250–284. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1978. “Response Cries.” Language 54(4): 787–815. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hennion, Antoine. 2007. “Those Things that Hold us Together: Taste and Sociology.” Cultural Sociology 1(1): 97–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, Dan. 2014. The Language of Food. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2004. “How to Talk about the Body? The Normative Dimension of Science Studies.” Body and Society 10(2–3): 205–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Law, John, and Marianne Elisabeth Lien. 2013. “Slippery: Field Notes in Empirical Ontology.” Social Studies of Science 43(3): 363–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Harry T. 1984. “Flavor Description of White Wine by ‘Expert’ and Nonexpert Wine Consumers.” Journal of Food Science 49: 120–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Lydia J. R., and Gail V. Civille. 2013. “Developing Lexicons.” Journal of Sensory Studies 28(2013): 270–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne. (1975). “Talking about Wine.” Language 51(4), 901–923. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009[1983]. Wine and Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C., and Asifa Majid. 2014. “Differential Ineffability and the Senses.” Mind & Language 29(4): 407–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Kenneth. 2013. “The Phenomenology of Coffee Tasting.” In More Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by Kenneth Liberman, 215–266. New York: SUNY. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Objectivation Practices.” Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality 1(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa. 2015. “Cultural Factors Shape Olfactory Language.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(11): 629–630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa., and Niclas Burenhult. 2014. “Odors Are Expressible in Language, as Long as You Speak the Right Language.” Cognition 130: 266–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Niclas Burenhult, Marcus Stensmyr, Josje de Valk, and Bill S. Hansson. 2018. “Olfactory Language and Abstraction across Cultures.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences 373(1752), 20170139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2018. “The Multimodal Interactional Organization of Tasting: Practices of Tasting Cheese in Gourmet Shops.” Discourse Studies 20(6): 743–769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “Rethinking Bodies and Objects in Social Interaction: a Multimodal and Multisensorial Approach to Tasting.” In Discussing New Materialism, ed. by Ulrike Tikvah Kissmann and Joost van Loon, 109–134. Wiesbaden: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “Audible Sniffs: Smelling-in-Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 53(1): 140–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021a. Sensing in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021b. “Language and the Sensing Body: How Sensoriality Permeates Syntax in Interaction” Frontiers in Communication 6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021c. “Orchestrating Multi-Sensoriality in Tasting Sessions: Sensing Bodies, Normativity, and Language.” Symbolic Interaction 44(1): 63–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. in press. “Sensory Semantics in Social Interaction.” Interactional Linguistics.
Mondada, Lorenza, and Giolo Fele. 2020. “Descrittori visivi per l’assaggio professionale: lessico, sensorialità e standardizzazione.” Rivista Italiana di Linguistica Applicata 49(3): 651–681.Google Scholar
Muniesa, Fabian, and Anne-Sophie Trébuchet-Breitwiller. 2010. “Becoming a Measuring Instrument.” Journal of Cultural Economy 3(3): 321–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 1970. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 2012. “The Sciences of Subjectivity.” Social Studies of Science 42(2): 170–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2006. “Old Wine, New Ethnographic Lexicography.” Annual Review of Anthropology 35(1): 481–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spackman, Christy. 2018. “Perfumer, Chemist, Machine: Gas Chromatography and the Industrial Search to ‘Improve’ Flavor.” The Senses and Society 13(1): 41–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teil, Geneviève. 1998. “Devenir expert aromaticien: Y a-t-il une place pour le goût dans les goûts alimentaires?” Sociologie du Travail 40(4): 503–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, Sally. 2002. “Talking with Your Mouth Full: Gustatory Mmms and the Embodiment of Pleasure.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 35(3): 311–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woolgar, Steve, and Javier Lezaun. 2013. “A Turn to Ontology in Science and Technology Studies?” Social Studies of Science 45(3): 321–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar