Part of
Language Change in the 20th Century: Exploring micro-diachronic evolutions in Romance languages
Edited by Salvador Pons Bordería and Shima Salameh Jiménez
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 340] 2024
► pp. 120157
References (87)
References
Agustín, José. 2001. La Contracultura en México. México: Grijalbo Mondadori.Google Scholar
. 2004. “La Onda que Nunca Existió.” Revista de Crítica Literaria Latinoamericana 30(59): 9–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen. 2004. “A model and a methodology for the study of pragmatic markers: the semantic field of expectation.” Journal of Pragmatics 36(10): 1781–1805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate. 2023. “Sociopragmatic variation, sort of and genre in English and French.” In Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic and Romance Languages – Semantics and pragmatics on the move, ed. by Wiltrud Mihatsch, Lieselotte Brems, Kristin Davidse, Inga Hennecke, Alena Kolyaseva, and Anna Kisiel, 695–721. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bittencourt, Vanda de Oliveira. 2000. “Tipo (assim) como delimitador de unidades de informação.” Estudos Lingüísticos, 29: 264–269.Google Scholar
Bregant, Lucía. 2019. “Marcadores de Reformulación en Adolescentes Bonaerenses.” In Estudios SAEL 2019, ed. by Dora Riestra, and Nora Múgica, 9–22. Bahía Blanca: Ediuns y SAEL.Google Scholar
Camacho, José. 2003. The coarse structure of the center periphery [Unpublished manuscript]. Rutgers University. Retrieved March 3, 2023 from [URL]Google Scholar
Cano Aguilar, Rafael. 1995. Sintaxis histórica de la comparación en español: La historia de “como”. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.Google Scholar
Cantilo, Miguel. 2000. ¡Chau Loco! Los Hippies en la Argentina de los Setenta. Buenos Aires: Galerna.Google Scholar
CDH = Instituto de Investigación Rafael Lapesa de la Real Academia Española. 2013. Corpus del Nuevo Diccionario Histórico del Español (CDH). Real Academia Española. Retrieved March 3, 2023 from [URL]
COLA = Jørgensen, Annette Myre and Esperanza Eguía Padilla. 2018. Corpus Oral de Lenguaje Adolescente (COLA). Retrieved March 3, 2023 from [URL]
C-ORAL-ROM = Cresti, Emanuela and Massimo Moneglia. 2005. C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated reference corpora for spoken Romance languages. CD-ROM. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
CORPES = Real Academia Española. 2021. Banco de datos (CORPES) Corpus del Español del Siglo XXI. Retrieved March 3, 2023 from [URL]
Chevalier, Gisèle. 2001. “Comment comme fonctionne d’une génération à l’autre.” Revue québécoise de linguistique 30(2): 13–40. DOI logo.Google Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandera. 2017. Discourse-pragmatic Variation in Context: Eight Hundred Years of Like. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalzell, Tom, and Terry Victor. 2015. The Concise New Partridge Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DAMER = Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. 2010. Diccionario De Americanismos. Retrieved March 3, 2023 from [URL]
DLE = Real Academia Española. 2014. Diccionario de la lengua española. Retrieved January 01, 2020 from [URL]
Eckert, Penelope. 1997. “Age as a Sociolinguistic Variable.” In Handbook of Sociolinguistics, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 151–167. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fernández, Julieta. 2017. “The Language Functions of tipo in Argentine Vernacular.” Journal of Pragmatics 114: 87–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne, and Marina Yaguello. 2004. “Discourse markers across languages? Evidence from English and French.” In Discourse across languages and cultures, ed. by Carol Lynn Moder, and Aida Martinovic-Zic, 129–147. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Fridell, Staffan. 1993. “Nya typtyper.” Språkvård 1: 25–26.Google Scholar
García Marcos, Francisco Joaquín, and Antonio J. Manjón-Cabeza Cruz. 1993. “Teoría sintáctica y cambio sociolingüístico (a propósito de los nuevos usos de “como” en español).” Docencia e Investigación: revista de la Escuela Universitaria de Magisterio de Toledo 18(3): 35–59.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2003. “The Geometry of Grammatical Meaning: Semantic Maps and Cross-linguistic Comparison.” In The New Psychology of Language, vol. 2, ed. by Michael Tomasello, 211–242. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hasund, Ingrid Kristine, Toril Opsahl and Jan Svennevig. 2012. “By three means. The pragmatic functions of three Norwegian quotatives.” In Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 15], ed. by Isabelle Buchstaller, and Ingrid van Alphen, 37–68. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hennecke, Inga. 2014. Pragmatic markers in Manitoban French: a corpuslinguistic and psycholinguistic investigation of language change [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ruhr-Universität Bochum. Retrieved March 3, 2023 from [URL]Google Scholar
Holmvik, Lise. 2011. Como usado como marcador del discurso en el lenguaje juvenil de Madrid [Master’s thesis, The University of Bergen]. Bergen Open Research Archive.Google Scholar
Huseby, Stine. 2010. Las funciones de tipo como marcador del discurso en el lenguaje juvenil de Buenos Aires: Un estudio descriptivo. [Master’s thesis, The University of Bergen]. Bergen Open Research Archive.Google Scholar
Isambert, Paul. 2016. “Genre: une mode récente mais qui vient de loin.” Journal of French Language Studies 26: 85–96. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Janebová, Markéta, Michaela Martinkova and Volker Gast. 2023. “Czech type nouns: Evidence from corpora.” In Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic and Romance Languages – Semantics and pragmatics on the move, ed. by Wiltrud Mihatsch, Lieselotte Brems, Kristin Davidse, Inga Hennecke, Alena Kolyaseva, and Anna Kisiel, 571–617. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, Annette Myre, and Anna-Brita Stenström. 2009. “Dos marcadores pragmáticos contrastados en el lenguaje juvenil: el inglés like y el español como.” Español Actual 92: 103–122.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Annette Myre. 2009. “En plan used as a hedge in Spanish teenage language.” In Youngspeak in a multilingual perspective, ed. by Anna-Brita Stenström, and Annette Myre Jørgensen, 95–115. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kern, Joseph. 2014. “Como in commute: The travels of a discourse marker across languages.” Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 7(2): 275–297. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Kisiel, Anna, and Alena Kolyaseva. 2023. “Towards a comprehensive typology of type noun constructions in Slavic languages, with a special focus on Polish and Russian.” In Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic and Romance Languages – Semantics and pragmatics on the move, ed. by Wiltrud Mihatsch, Lieselotte Brems, Kristin Davidse, Inga Hennecke, Alena Kolyaseva, and Anna Kisiel, 501–544. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolyaseva, Alena, and Kristin Davidse. 2018. “A typology of lexical and grammaticalized uses of Russian tip, tipa, po tipu.” Russian linguistics 42 (2): 191–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kornfeld, Laura. 2013. “Atenuadores en la Lengua Coloquial Argentina.” Lingüística 29(2): 17–49.Google Scholar
Kraushaar, Wolfgang. 2018. Die 68er-Bewegung International. Eine Illustrierte Chronik 1960–1969, vol. 1–4. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors, Vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lapteva, Olga. 1983. “Tipa ili vrode? [Tipa or vrode?]. Voprosy jazykoznanija.” Topics in the Study of Language 1:39–51.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2014. “Growth and Decline: How Grammar has Been Changing in Recent English.” In Major Trends in Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, ed. by Nikolaos Lavidas, Thomaï Alexiou, and Areti Sougari, 47–66. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lima Hernandes, Maria Célia. 2005. A interface sociolingüística/gramaticalização: estratificação de usos de tipo, feito, igual e como – sincronia e diacronia [Doctoral dissertation, Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem da Universidade Estadual de Campinas]. Unicamp.Google Scholar
Maddeaux, Ruth, and Aaron Dinkin. 2017. “Is like like like?: Evaluating the same variant across multiple variables.” Linguistics Vanguard 3(1): 20150032. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marques, Maria Aldina. 2023. “Pragmatic functions and contexts of use of tipo in European Portuguese.” In Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic, and Romance Languages – Semantics and pragmatics on the move, ed. by Wiltrud Mihatsch, Lieselotte Brems, Kristin Davidse, Inga Hennecke, Alena Kolyaseva, and Anna Kisiel, 393–414. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mihatsch, Wiltrud. 2010a. Wird man von Hustensaft wie so ne art bekifft?“ Approximationsmarker in romanischen Sprachen. Frankfurt am Main: KlostermannGoogle Scholar
. 2020b. “Los orígenes discursivos de los atenuadores procedimentalizados tipo, onda, corte y rollo: Una exploración microdiacrónica.” Revista Signos 53(104): 686–717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010b. “The diachrony of rounders and adaptors: Approximation and unidirectional change.” In New approaches to Hedging, ed. by Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch, and Stefan Schneider, 93–122. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Sincronía y diacronía del aproximador como.” Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana (RILI) 16: 175–201.Google Scholar
. 2018. “De la escritura científica a la conversación coloquial adolescente. El caso de tipo.” Spanish in Context 15(2): 281–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “From ad hoc category to ad hoc categorization: The proceduralization of Argentinian Spanish tipo.” Folia Linguistica 52(s39-s1): 147–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020a. “A Semantic-map Approach to Pragmatic Markers: the Complex Approximation / Mitigation / Quotation / Focus Marking. (Peninsular Spanish (tipo, así, como) and European Portuguese (tipo, assim, como) Based on a Corpus Analysis of C-ORAL-ROM).” In O Português como Referência Contrastiva, ed. by Isabel M. Oliveira Duarte and Rogelio Ponce de Léon Romeo, 137–162. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2021. “French type-noun constructions based on genre: From the creation of ad hoc categories to ad hoc categorization.” In Building categories in interaction: linguistic resources at work, ed. by Caterina Mauri, Ilaria Fiorentini and Eugenio Goria, 373–414. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023a. “A panoramic overview of the extended uses of taxonomic nouns.” In Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic and Romance Languages – Semantics and pragmatics on the move, ed. by Wiltrud Mihatsch, Lieselotte Brems, Kristin Davidse, Inga Hennecke, Alena Kolyaseva, and Anna Kisiel, 1–52. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2023b. “General introduction: Taxonomic nouns and their derived functions in Germanic, Romance and Slavic languages.” In Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic and Romance Languages – Semantics and pragmatics on the move, ed. by Wiltrud Mihatsch, Lieselotte Brems, Kristin Davidse, Inga Hennecke, Alena Kolyaseva, and Anna Kisiel, 245–310. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mihatsch, Wiltrud and Ana Vazeilles. In press. “Culturas juveniles como catalizador de la pragmaticalización de los marcadores tipo y onda en Argentina y México. Un estudio basado en comentarios metalingüísticos.” Spanish in Context.
Miller, Jim and Regina Weinert. 1995. “The function of like in dialogue.” Journal of Pragmatics 23: 365–393. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Mondaca Becerra, Lissette. 2019. “Aproximadores y atenuadores en el español de Chile: el caso de como y como que.” Textos en Proceso, 5(1): 29-52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “Aproximación al Estudio de las Funciones Pragmáticas y a la Atenuación en la Partícula onda en el Español de Chile.” Revista Signos 53: 718–743. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montes, José Joaquín. 1980–1981. “Sobre el como de atenuación.” Boletín de Filología de la Universidad de Chile 31: 667–675.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy A. and Dennis R. Preston. 2003. Folk Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
NURC = Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Faculdade de Letras (n.d.). NURC RJ (Projeto da Norma Urbana Oral Culta do Rio de Janeiro). Retrieved March 3, 2023 from [URL]
Odden, Oda Røste. 2019. North Scandinavian type noun constructions: Patterns with slags, SORTs and TYP(E). [Doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo].Google Scholar
OED = Oxford English Dictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved March 3, 2023 from [URL]
Palacios, Patricia. 2020. Clase, Similitud y Vaguedad en ‚tipo‘ y ‚como‘. Outline of PhD-thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro.Google Scholar
Panussis-Lyon, Constanza, and Abelardo San Martín-Núñez. 2017. “Como (que) y sus funciones discursivas en el habla santiaguina: análisis pragmático sociolingüístico.” Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada 55 (2): 39–61. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. 2004. “Inevitable reanalysis. From local adpositions to approximative adnumerals, in German and wherever.” Studies in Language 28(1): 165–201. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador and Ana Llopis Cardona. 2020. “Some reflections on semantic-pragmatic cycles.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21 (2): 315–346. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador. 2014. “El Siglo XX como Diacronía: Intuición y Comprobación en el Caso de o sea.” RILCE 30(3): 985–1016. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Popescu, Cecilia-Mihaela and Alice Ionescu. 2019. “Étude comparative des marqueurs métadiscursifs gen du roumain et genre du français. Distribution et valeurs pragmatiques.” Studii de lingvistică 9(2): 93–112.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1996. “Whaddayaknow: The Modes of Folk Linguistic Awareness.” Language Awareness 5(1): 40–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rojas Inostroza, Cristian, Alejandra Rubio Núñez, Abelardo San Martín Núñez and Silvana Guerrero González. 2012. “Análisis Pragmático y Sociolingüístico de los Marcadores Discursivos de Reformulación en el Habla de Santiago de Chile.” Lenguas Modernas 40: 103–123.Google Scholar
Rosenkvist, Henrik and Sanna Skärlund. 2013. Grammaticalization in the present: The changes of modern Swedish typ. In Synchrony and diachrony: A dynamic interface, ed. by Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri, and Piera Molinelli, 313–338. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. . DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roszak, Theodore. 1973. El Nacimiento de una Contracultura: Reflexiones Sobre la Sociedad Tecnocrática y su Oposición Juvenil. Barcelona: Kairós.Google Scholar
Said-Mohand, Aixa. 2008. “Aproximación sociolingüística al uso del marcador del discurso como.” Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 6(2): 71–93.Google Scholar
San Martín Núñez, Abelardo. 2017. “Análisis Sociolingüístico de los Reformuladores de Explicación en el Español Hablado de Santiago de Chile.” Revista Signos 50: 124–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 2006. “Age: Apparent Time and Real Time.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. by K. Brown, 110–116. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scharloth, Joachim. 2008. “Kommunikationsguerilla 1968. Strategien der Subversion symbolischer Ordnung in der Studentenbewegung.” In Musikulturen in der Revolte, ed. by Beate Kutschke, 187–196. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
. 2011. 1968. Eine Kommunikationsgeschichte. Paderborn: Fink. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schumann, Kathleen. 2021. Der Fokusmarker‚ so‘. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Silva Teixeira, Cristiana Filipa, Elisabete Pinto Ribeiro, and Sara Raquel da Silva Salgado. 2016. “Marcadores discursivos na oralidade.” Revista eletrónica de Linguística dos estudantes da Universidade do Porto 5.Google Scholar
Terian, Simina-Maria. 2018. “(Inter)subiectificare şi gramaticalizare: gen în limba română contemporană.” Transilvania review 11–12: 129–134.Google Scholar
Velando Casanova, Mónica. 2005. Las estructuras comparativas con como en la crónica medieval: De Alfonso X a López de Ayala. Castelló de la Plana: Universitat Jaume I..Google Scholar
Voghera, Miriam. 2023. “The network of specie, genere, sorta, tipo constructions: From lexical features to discursive functions.” In Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic and Romance Languages – Semantics and pragmatics on the move, ed. by Wiltrud Mihatsch, Lieselotte Brems, Kristin Davidse, Inga Hennecke, Alena Kolyaseva, and Anna Kisiel, 351–392. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiese, Heike. 2011. “So as a focus marker in German.” Linguistics 49(5): 991–1039. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zafiu, Rodica. 2001. “Tip şi gen.” România literară 12. Retrieved March 3, 2023 from [URL]Google Scholar
Zolov, Eric. 1999. Refried Elvis: The Rise of the Mexican Counterculture. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold. 2007. “The Word: Recency Illusion.” New Scientist 196(2630): 60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Mihatsch, Wiltrud & Ana Vazeilles

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.