Cover not available
Part of
The Pragmatics of Hypocrisy
Edited by Sandrine Sorlin and Tuija Virtanen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 343] 2024
► pp. 15–42

Chapter 2
A pragmatic model of hypocrisy

| University Paul-Valéry – Montpellier 3
| Åbo Akademi University

Based on the general definition of hypocrisy given in the introductory chapter, this chapter shows how pragmatics can deepen and add to the understanding of hypocrisy. It first guides the reader to think differently about this traditionally morally-laden and negatively-evaluated notion. It then sets out to establish the pragmatic space of verbal hypocrisy by confronting it with the notions of face, tact, flattery, politeness, irony, deception, and lying. To be identified as such, hypocrisy appears to require a reveal by or through a third party, but it can be left unexposed in contexts where people jointly play along with it, and occasionally even be disclosed by the hypocrite. As a first attempt to date, we devise a pragmatic model of verbal hypocrisy. The chapter concludes with a comment on the need for a renewed philosophy of language.

Keywords: verbal hypocrisy, model, pretence, (im)politeness, civil hypocrisy, sincerity, (dis)simulation, face, impression management
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Thinking differently about hypocrisy
  • 3.A pragmatic analysis
  • 4.Proximity to established pragmatic notions
    • 4.1Face
    • 4.2Tact
    • 4.3Flattery
    • 4.4Politeness
    • 4.5Irony
    • 4.6Deception
    • 4.7Lying
  • 5.A pragmatic model of hypocrisy
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 March 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.343.02sor
References
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1978 “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena." In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, ed. by Esther N. Goody, 56-310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capraro, Valerio, Matjaz Perc, and Daniele Vilone
2020 “Lying on Networks: The Role of Structure and Topology in Promoting Honesty.” Physical Review E 101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chan, Elaine, and Jaideep Sengupta
2010 “Insincere Flattery Actually Works: A Dual Attitudes Perspective.” Journal of Marketing Research 47 (1): 122–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerrig
1984 “On the Pretense Theory of Irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113 (1): 121–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, Herbert, and Jennifer O’Brien
2000 “Contrast and Pragmatics in Figurative Language: Anything Understatement Can Do, Irony Can Do Better.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1557–1583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conway, Erik, and Naomi Oreskes
2015 Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. Bloomsbury Press. Reprint edition.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh, and Valeria Sinkeviciute
2017 The Palgrave Handbook of (Im)politeness. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Vittorio Tantucci
2021 “The Principle of (Im)politeness Reciprocity.” Journal of Pragmatics 175: 146–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danziger, Roni
2020 The Pragmatics of Flattery: The Strategic Use of Solidarity-oriented Actions.” Journal of Pragmatics 170: 413–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2023 Positive Social Acts: A Metapragmatic Exploration of the Brighter and Darker Sides of Sociability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Jenny
2004 Hypocrisy and the Politics of Politeness: Manners and Morals from Locke to Austen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Louis
2005 “Manipulation and Cognitive Pragmatics: Preliminary Hypotheses.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind, ed. by Louis de Saussure, and Peter Schulz, 113–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dews, Shelly, Joan Kaplan, and Ellen Winner
2007 “Why not Say it Directly? The Social Functions of Irony.” In Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader, ed. by Raymond W. Gibbs, and Herbert L. Colston, 297–317. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon
2005 “L’usage stratégique de l’argumentation.” Négociations 2 (4): 59–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eylon, Yuval, and David Heyd
2008 “Flattery.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (3): 685–704. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fein, Ellen, and Sherrie Schneiber
1995 All the Rules: Time-tested Secrets for Capturing the Heart of Mr. Right. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Leonard
2002 Hypocrisy: Don’t Leave Home Without It. Greeley: Pilgrims’ Process.Google Scholar
Fielding, Henry
1967 [1742] The History of the Adventures of Joseph Andrews and of his Friend Mr Abraham Adams and An Apology for the Life of Mrs Shamela Andrews. Edited by Douglas Brooks-Davies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry
2005 On Bullshit. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fu, Genyue, Angela D. Evans, Lingfeng Wang, and Kang Lee
2008 “Lying in the Name of the Collective Good: A Developmental Study.” Developmental Science 11: 495–503. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1967 “On Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” In Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior, 5–45. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–48. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christian L., Jelisa M. Jones, John A. Terrizzi, and Drew A. Curtis
2019 “Development of the Lying in Everyday Situations Scale.” The American Journal of Psychology 132 (3): 343–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Bruce Hardy
2012 “What is Civil Engaged Argument and Why Does Aspiring to It Matter?” PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (3): 412–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jobert, Manuel, and Sorlin, Sandrine
2018 “Introduction: The Intricacies of Irony and Banter.” In The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter, ed. by Manuel Jobert, and Sandrine Sorlin, 3–21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jordan, Jillian J., Roseanna Sommers, Paul Bloom, and David G. Rand
2017 “Why Do We Hate Hypocrites? Evidence for a Theory of False Signaling.” Psychological Science 28 (3): 356–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Irma Taavitsainen
2000 “Diachronic Speech Act Analysis: Insults from Flyting to Flaming.” Journal of Historial Pragmatics 1 (1): 67–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kapust, Daniel J.
2018 Flattery and the History of Political Thought: That Glib and Oily Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder
1982 “On Hypocrisy.” Metaphilosophy 13 (3–4): 277–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Laurence E.
1989 “Liberty, Manners, and Politeness in Early Eighteenth-century England.” The Historical Journal 32 (3): 583–605. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, Roger, Debra Long, and Mary Church
1991 “On Being Ironic: Pragmatic and Mnemonic Implications.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 6: 149–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2014 The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maillat, Didier
2013 “Constraining Context Selection: On the Pragmatic Inevitability of Manipulation.” Journal of Pragmatics 59: 190–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, Christine
1991 “Hypocrisy, with a Note on Integrity.” American Philosophical Quarterly 28 (4): 321–330. [URL]Google Scholar
Mills, Sara
2017 English Politeness and Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Driscoll, Jim
2020 Offensive Language: Taboo, Offence and Social Control. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola, and Jef Verschueren
(founding eds) 1995 Handbook of Pragmatics. Available online since 2003. International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) Research Center. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paternoster, Annick, and Susan Fitzmaurice
(eds) 2019 Politeness in Nineteenth-century Europe. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Samuel
2013[1740] Pamela or Virtue Rewarded. London: Oxford World’s Classics.Google Scholar
Riley, Denise
2005 Impersonal Passion: Language as Affect. Durham & London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, David
(ed) 1998 Lord Chesterfield’s Letters (1737–68). London: Oxford World’s Classics.Google Scholar
Rockwell, Patricia Ann
2006 Sarcasm and Other Mixed Messages: The Ambiguous Ways People Use Language. Lewinston: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Runciman, David
2008 Political Hypocrisy: The Mask of Power from Hobbes to Orwell and Beyond. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith
1984 Ordinary Vices. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sifianou, Maria
2023 “Dangerous Politeness? Understandings of Politeness in the Covid-19 Era and Beyond.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Paul
2011 “ ‘That’s not Ironic, that’s just Stupid:’ Towards an Eclectic Account of the Discourse of Irony.” In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, ed. by Marta Dynel, 33–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorlin, Sandrine
2013 “The Power of Impoliteness: A Historical Perspective.” In Aspects of Linguistic Impoliteness, ed. by Denis Jamet, and Manuel Jobert, 45–58. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
2016 Language and Manipulation in House of Cards: A Pragma-Stylistic Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “The Pragmatics of Manipulation: Exploiting Im/politeness Theories.” Journal of Pragmatics 121: 132–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
2005 “(Im)Politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpackaging their Bases and Interrelationships.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1 (1): 95–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
2015 “Review of the Pragmatics of Politeness.” Language 91 (4): 957–960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2014 A Natural History of Human Thinking. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toplak, Mary, and Albert Katz
2000 “On the Uses of Sarcastic Irony.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1467–1488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
2022 Complicity in Discourse and Practice. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija
2013 “Performativity in Computer-Mediated Communication.” In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. by Susan C. Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 269–290. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J.
2002 “From Polite to Educated Language: The Re-emergence of an Ideology.” In Alternatives Histories of English, ed. by Richard J. Watts, and Peter Trudgill, 155–172. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2003 Politeness: Key Topics in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wieting, Stephen G.
2015 The Sociology of Hypocrisy: An Analysis of Sport and Religion. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2020 The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-Right Discourses. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Jonathan Culpeper, and Elena Semino
2021 “Shameless Normalisation of Impoliteness: Berlusconi’s and Trump’s press conferences.” Discourse & Society 32 (3): 369–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar