Cover not available
Part of
The Pragmatics of Hypocrisy
Edited by Sandrine Sorlin and Tuija Virtanen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 343] 2024
► pp. 44–73

Chapter 3
Politics, religion, and drama

Exploring the metapragmatics of hypocrisy

| Vienna University of Economics and Business

This chapter explores the metapragmatics of hypocrisy by taking a corpus-based approach to analysis. Specifically, the paper focuses on examining which social actors are labelled as hypocrites, what situations accusations of hypocrisy tend to occur in, and how language is used to construct people’s understanding of what hypocrisy is. To achieve this, instances of the lemma hypocrisy are examined within the Times Online 2000s corpus. Collocation analysis is used to explore the discourses in which the lemma is found, and as a result six broad categories are identified: social actors; religion and morality; society, social issues and justice; class system; drama; and metaphors. Exploration of these collocates and their respective concordance lines helps to further the understanding of this complex phenomenon, and it goes some way towards bridging the gap between traditional deception theory stemming from social psychology, and more recent empirical work within pragmatics.

Keywords: hypocrisy, metapragmatics, deception, corpus-based discourse analysis, concordance analysis, collocation analysis, metaphor, politics, religion, drama
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Theoretical outlook
    • 2.2Hypocrisy and word-deed misalignment
    • 2.3Research questions
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Corpus-based methods
    • 3.2Data
  • 4.Results and analysis
    • 4.1Social actors
    • 4.2Religion and morality
    • 4.3Society, social issues, and justice
    • 4.4Class system
    • 4.5Drama
    • 4.6Metaphors
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 1 March 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.343.03gil
References
Archer, Dawn, and Mathew Gillings
2020 “Depictions of Deception: A Corpus-based Analysis of Five Shakespearean Characters.” Language and Literature 29 (3): 246–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul
2006 Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michal Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, and Tony McEnery
2013 Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, Andrew Hardie, and Tony McEnery
2006 A Glossary of Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balfour, James
2019 “ ‘The Mythological Marauding Violent Schizophrenic’: Using the Word Sketch Tool to Examine Representations of Schizophrenic People as Violent in the British Press.” Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies 3: 40–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Rochelle Lieber, and Ingo Plag
2013 The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika, and Helen Caple
2017 The Discourse of News Values: How News Organizations Create Newsworthiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buller, David, and Judee K. Burgoon
1996 “Interpersonal Deception Theory.” Communication Theory 6 (3): 203–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgers, Christian, Margot van Mulken, and Peter J. Schellens
2011 “Finding Irony: An Introduction of the Verbal Irony Procedure (VIP).” Metaphor & Symbol 26 (3): 186–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2009 “The Metalanguage of IMPOLITENESS: Using Sketch Engine to Explore the Oxford English Corpus.” In Contemporary Corpus Linguistics, ed. by Paul Baker, 64–86. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Michael Haugh
2021 “The Metalinguistics of Offence in (British) English: A Corpus-based Metapragmatic Approach.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9 (2): 185–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DePaulo, Bella, M.
1992 “Nonverbal Behavior and Self-presentation.” Psychological Bulletin 111 (2): 203–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DePaulo, Bella M., James J. Lindsay, Brian E. Malone, Laura Muhlenbruck, Kelly Charlton, and Harris Cooper
2003 “Cues to Deception.” Psychological Bulletin 129 (1): 74–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Effron, Daniel A., Kieran O’Connor, Hannes Leroy, and Brian J. Lucas
2018 “From Inconsistency to Hypocrisy: When Does “Saying One Thing but Doing Another” Invite Condemnation?” Research in Organizational Behavior 38: 61–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekman, Paul, and Wallace V. Friesen
1969 “Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception.” Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes 32 (1): 88–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Leonard
2002 Hypocrisy: Don’t Leave Home Without It. Colorado: Pilgrims’ Process.Google Scholar
Firth, John R.
1957 “A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory, 1930–1955.” In Studies in Linguistic Analysis, ed. by John R. Firth, 1–32. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fried, Carrie B., and Elliot Aronson
1995 “Hypocrisy, Misattribution, and Dissonance Reduction.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21 (9): 925–933. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, Howard, Justine Coupland, and Nikolas Coupland
1991 Contexts of Accommodation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gillings, Mathew
2021 A Corpus-based Investigation into Verbal Cues to Deception and Their Sociolinguistic Distribution. Unpublished PhD Thesis: Lancaster University.
2022 “How to Use Corpus Linguistics in Forensic Linguistics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, 2nd edn, ed. by Anne O’Keeffe and Mike McCarthy, 589–301. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2024 Corpus Linguistic Approaches to Deception Detection. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gillings, Mathew, and Carmen Dayrell
2023 “Climate change in the UK Press: Examining Discourse Fluctuation over Time.” Applied Linguistics. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gillings, Mathew, and Gerlinde Mautner
2023 “Concordancing for CADS: Practical Challenges and Theoretical Implications.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gillings, Mathew, Gerlinde Mautner, and Paul Baker
2023 Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1959 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Hancock, Jeffrey T., Michael T. Woodworth, and Stephen Porter
2013 “Hungry Like the Wolf: A Word-pattern Analysis of the Language of Psychopaths.” Legal and Criminological Psychology 18 (1): 102–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardie, Andrew
2012 “CQPweb – Combining Power, Flexibility and Usability in a Corpus Analysis Tool.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17 (3): 380–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Log Ratio – An Informal Introduction.” [URL] [Accessed 2 Nov 2023].
Haugh, Michael
2018 “Corpus-based Metapragmatics.” In Methods in Pragmatics, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, Klaus P. Schneider, and Wolfram Bublitz, 619–643. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lauriano, Lucas A., Juliane Reinecke, and Michael Etter
2021 “When Aspirational Talk Backfires: The Role of Moral Judgements in Employees’ Hypocrisy Interpretation.” Journal of Business Ethics 181: 827–845. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louw, Bill
1993 “Irony in the Text or Insincerity in the Writer? The Diagnostic Potential of Semantic Prosodies.” In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair. ed. by Mona Baker, Gill Francis and Elena Tognini-Bonelli, 157–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masip, Jaume, Eugenio Garrido, and Carmen Herrero
2004 “Defining Deception.” Anales de Psicologia 20 (1): 147–171.Google Scholar
Newman, Matthew L., James W. Pennebaker, Diane S. Berry, and Jane M. Richards
2003 “Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29 (5): 665–675. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Runciman, David
2006 The Politics of Good Intentions: History, Fear and Hypocrisy in the New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Political Hypocrisy: The Mask of Power from Hobbes to Orwell and Beyond. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael
2001 Words and Phrases. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charlotte
2017 “The Relationship between Irony and Sarcasm: Insights from a First-order Metalanguage Investigation.” Journal of Politeness Research 2 (1): 209–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena
2001 Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vrij, Aldert
2008 Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich
1992 “Introduction.” In Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, ed. by Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich, 1–17. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wieting, Stephen G.
2015 The Sociology of Hypocrisy: An Analysis of Sport and Religion. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2020 The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-right Discourse, 2nd edn. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar