Chapter 3
Politics, religion, and drama
Exploring the metapragmatics of hypocrisy
This chapter explores the metapragmatics of hypocrisy by taking a corpus-based approach to analysis.
Specifically, the paper focuses on examining which social actors are labelled as hypocrites, what situations
accusations of hypocrisy tend to occur in, and how language is used to construct people’s understanding of what
hypocrisy is. To achieve this, instances of the lemma hypocrisy are examined within the Times Online
2000s corpus. Collocation analysis is used to explore the discourses in which the lemma is found, and as
a result six broad categories are identified: social actors; religion and morality; society, social issues and
justice; class system; drama; and metaphors. Exploration of these collocates and their respective concordance lines
helps to further the understanding of this complex phenomenon, and it goes some way towards bridging the gap between
traditional deception theory stemming from social psychology, and more recent empirical work within pragmatics.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1Theoretical outlook
- 2.2Hypocrisy and word-deed misalignment
- 2.3Research questions
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Corpus-based methods
- 3.2Data
- 4.Results and analysis
- 4.1Social actors
- 4.2Religion and morality
- 4.3Society, social issues, and justice
- 4.4Class system
- 4.5Drama
- 4.6Metaphors
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
-
Appendix