Cover not available
Part of
The Pragmatics of Hypocrisy
Edited by Sandrine Sorlin and Tuija Virtanen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 343] 2024
► pp. 74–95

Chapter 4
“Ding ding ding we have a hypocrite!”

The metapragmatics of verbal hypocrisy in discussion forum interaction

| University of Helsinki
This study approaches verbal hypocrisy from a metapragmatic perspective, arguing that our understanding of hypocrisy as a pragmatic phenomenon benefits from an analysis of how language users negotiate hypocrisy in actual interaction. The goal is to uncover what kinds of statements participants in online discussions perceive as verbal hypocrisy, how they react to it and how they discuss it. Participants’ claims of hypocrisy are regarded as evaluative metapragmatic acts, with which they make visible their assessment of language use as hypocritical. The analysis of the claims in their context reveals that claims are made in situations of perceived double standards or misalignment. Reactions to claims of hypocrisy range from resistance and negotiation to silence. Furthermore, the negotiation of hypocrisy involves considerations of intention and accountability.
Keywords: claim of hypocrisy, metapragmatic evaluation, online interaction, intention, accountability
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Hypocrisy
  • 3.Metapragmatics
  • 4.Material and methods
  • 5.Claims of hypocrisy in the discussions on TSR forums
    • 5.1Self-condemnation
    • 5.2Other-directed claims
      • 5.2.1Detection and denial
      • 5.2.2Detection and acknowledgement
      • 5.2.3Detection and disregard
  • 6.From double standards to the moral high ground: Causes of claims of hypocrisy
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 March 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.343.04tan
References (36)
References
Alicke, Mark, Ellen Gordon, and David Rose. 2013. “Hypocrisy: What Counts?” Philosophical Psychology 26 (5): 673–701. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Batson, C. Daniel, Diane Kobrynowicz, Jessica L. Dinnerstein, Hannah C. Kampf, and Angela D. Wilson. 1997. “In a Very Different Voice: Unmasking Moral Hypocrisy.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72(6): 1335–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, and Ben Rampton. 2011. “Language and Superdiversity.” Diversities 13(2): 1–22. [URL]Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia. 2021. “Evaluation, Conflict and Prescriptive Metapragmatic Comments: (Re)constructing Transmedia Stories.” In Analyzing Digital Discourses: Between Convergence and Controversy, ed. by Marjut Johansson, Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, and Jan Chovanec, 189–217. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2014. “Conflict Management in Massive Polylogues: A Case Study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics 73: 19–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Steven Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram. 2015. “Introducing Quoting as a Ubiquitous Meta-communicative Act.” In The Pragmatics of Quoting Then and Now, ed. by Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz, and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 1–26. Berlin etc.: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caffi, Claudia. 1998. “Metapragmatics.” In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, ed. by Jacob L. Mey, 581–586. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Michael Haugh. 2014. Pragmatics and the English Language. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dayter, Daria. 2018. “Self-praise Online and Offline: The Hallmark Speech Act of Social Media?” Internet Pragmatics 1(1): 184–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta, and Fabio Poppi. 2019. “Risum Teneatis, Amici? The Socio-pragmatics of RoastMe Humour.” Journal of Pragmatics 139: 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Effron, Daniel A., Kieran O’Connor, Hannes Leroy, and Brian J. Lucas. 2018. “From Inconsistency to Hypocrisy: When Does “saying one thing but doing another” Invite Condemnation?” Research in Organizational Behavior 38: 61–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ephratt, Michal. 2022. Silence as Language: Verbal Silence as a Means of Expression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franzke, Aline Shakti, Anja Bechmann, Michael Zimmer, Charles Ess, and The Association of Internet Researchers. 2020. Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. [URL] [Accessed 30 Oct 2023].Google Scholar
Fukushima, Saeko, and Michael Haugh. 2014. “The Role of Emic Understandings in Theorizing Im/politeness: The Metapragmatics of Attentiveness, Empathy and Anticipatory Inference in Japanese and Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics 74: 165–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gauducheau, Nadia, and Michel Marcoccia. 2021. Aggressiveness on a French Discussion Forum for Youth: Analyzing the Participants’ Point of View. In Analyzing Digital Discourses: Between Convergence and Controversy, ed. by Marjut Johansson, Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, and Jan Chovanec, 275–305. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2003. “Computer-Mediated Communication.” In Handbook of Pragmatics Online, ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2008. “Intention in Pragmatics.” Intercultural Pragmatics (8): 99–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Corpus-based Metapragmatics.” In Methods in Pragmatics, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, Klaus P. Schneider, and Wolfram Bublitz, 619–644. Berlin etc.: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt. 2012. “Speaker Intentions and Intentionality.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Keith Allan, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 87–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, John P., and Randall Stokes. 1975. “Disclaimers.” American Sociological Review 40(1): 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hübler, Axel, and Wolfram Bublitz. 2007. “Introducing Metapragmatics in Use.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz, and Axel Hübler, 1–26. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jordan, Jillian J., Roseanna Sommers, Paul Bloom, and David G. Rand. 2017. ”Why Do We Hate Hypocrites? Evidence for a Theory of False Signaling.” Psychological Science 28(3): 356–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleinke, Sonja, and Birte Bös. 2015. “Intergroup Rudeness and the Metapragmatics of Its Negotiation in Online Discussion Fora.” In Relational Work in CMC, ed. by Miriam Locher, Brook Bolander, and Nicole Höhn. Special issue of Pragmatics 25(1): 47–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Ping, and Huiying Liu. 2021. “Salience Adjusting: Metapragmatic Expressions in Complaint Responses.” Journal of Pragmatics 176: 150–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann, and George Yule. 2001. “Formulaic Disclaimers.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 45–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1968. “Sequencing in Conversational Openings.” American Anthropologist 70: 1075–1095. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinkeviciute, Valeria. 2019. “Juggling Identities in Interviews: The Metapragmatics of ‘Doing Humour’”. Journal of Pragmatics 152: 216–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szabados, Béla. 1979. “Hypocrisy.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9(2): 195–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa. 2007. “Metapragmatic Utterances in Computer-mediated Interaction.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz, and Axel Hübler, 87–106. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Identity and Metapragmatic Acts in a Student Forum Discussion Thread.” In The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline, ed. by Birte Bös, Sonja Kleinke, Sandra Mollin, and Nuria Hernández, 133–152. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “’Stop Arguing’: Interventions as Metapragmatic Acts in Discussion Forum Interaction.” In Analyzing Digital Discourses: Between Convergence and Controversy, ed. by Marjut Johansson, Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, and Jan Chovanec, 219–244. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valdesolo, Piercarlo, and David DeSteno. 2007. “Moral Hypocrisy: Social Groups and the Flexibility of Virtue.” Psychological Science 18(8): 689–690. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 2000. “Notes on the Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language Use.” Pragmatics 10 (4): 439–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar